+7 495 989 9610, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Regional Economics: Theory and Practice
 

Cultural ecosystem services: The essence and author-developed classification

Vol. 19, Iss. 11, NOVEMBER 2021

Received: 12 August 2021

Received in revised form: 25 September 2021

Accepted: 7 October 2021

Available online: 15 November 2021

Subject Heading: ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS

JEL Classification: B29, Q57

Pages: 2174–2197

https://doi.org/10.24891/re.19.11.2174

Vera V. YURAK Ural State Mining University (URSMU), Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
vera_yurak@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1529-3865

Yuliya P. BORISOVA Ural State Mining University (URSMU), Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
parus_cyanus@mail.ru

ORCID id: not available

Subject. This article considers the content of the Cultural Ecosystem Services notion.
Objectives. The article aims to develop an original classification of cultural ecosystem services.
Methods. For the study, we used the methods of analysis, synthesis, analogy, comparison, and the dialectical, historical, and abstract-logical approaches.
Results. Based on the analysis of key fundamental projects related to the development of cultural ecosystem services, and the experience of building their classifications in order to avoid duplication of functions, the article proposes an author-developed classification of cultural ecosystem services, which excludes functional duplication and takes into account the experience gained in this area.

Keywords: classification, culture, cultural ecosystem services, theory of ecosystem services, total economic value concept

References:

  1. Costanza R., d’Arge R., de Groot R. et al. The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Ecological Economics, 1998, vol. 25, iss. 1, pp. 3–15. URL: Link00020-2
  2. Daily G.C. (Ed.). Nature's Services. Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, Island Press, 1997, 392 p.
  3. Norgaard R.B. Ecosystem Services: From Eye-opening Metaphor to Complexity Blinder. Ecological Economics, 2010, vol. 69, iss. 6, pp. 1219–1227. URL: Link
  4. Yurak V.V. [Ecosystem services in regional development: approaches to economic assessment]. Ekonomika prirodopol'zovaniya = Nature Management Economics, 2016, no. 2, pp. 19–39. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  5. De Groot R.S., Wilson M.A., Boumans R.M.J. A Typology for the Classification, Description and Valuation of Ecosystem Functions, Goods and Services. Ecological Economics, 2002, vol. 41, iss. 3, pp. 393–408. URL: Link00089-7
  6. Dushin A.V., Yurak V.V. Authors’ Approach to the Total Economic Value: Essentials, Structure, Evolution. Eurasian Mining, 2018, no. 1, pp. 11–15. URL: Link
  7. Ignatyeva M., Yurak V., Logvinenko O. A New Look at the Natural Capital Concept: Approaches, Structure, and Evaluation Procedure. Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, iss. 21, pp. 1–21. URL: Link
  8. Yurak V.V., Dushin A.V., Mochalova L.A. [Vs sustainable development: scenarios for the future]. Zapiski Gornogo instituta = Journal of Mining Institute, 2020, vol. 242, pp. 242–247. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  9. Bobylev S.N., Goryacheva A.A. Identification and Assessment of Ecosystem Services: The International Context. International Organisations Research Journal, 2019, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 225–236. URL: Link
  10. Dushin A.V., Ignatyeva M.N., Yurak V.V., Ivanov A.N. Economic Evaluation of Environmental Impact of Mining: Ecosystem Approach. Eurasian Mining, 2020, no. 1, pp. 30–36. URL: Link
  11. Terêncio D.P.S., Varandas S.G.P., Fonseca A.R. et al. Integrating Ecosystem Services into Sustainable Landscape Management: A Collaborative Approach. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, vol. 794, 148538. URL: Link
  12. De Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L. et al. Challenges in Integrating the Concept of Ecosystem Services and Values in Landscape Planning, Management and Decision Making. Ecological Complexity, 2010, vol. 7, iss. 3, pp. 260–272. URL: Link
  13. Ash N., Blanco H., Brown C. et al. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Manual for Assessment Practitioners. Washington, Island Press, 2010, 288 p.
  14. Tishkov А.А. [Biosphere functions and ecosystem services of landscapes within the steppe zone of Russia]. Aridnye ekosistemy = Arid Ecosystems, 2010, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 5–15. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  15. Kandziora M., Burkhard B., Müller F. Interactions of Ecosystem Properties, Ecosystem Integrity and Ecosystem Service Indicators – A Theoretical Matrix Exercise. Ecological Indicators, 2013, vol. 28, pp. 54–78. URL: Link
  16. Bobylev S.N., Bukvareva E.N., Grabovskii V.I. et al. Ekosistemnye uslugi Rossii: prototip natsional'nogo doklada. T. 1. Uslugi nazemnykh ekosistem: monografiya [Ecosystem services of Russia: prototype of the national report. Services of the terrestrial ecosystems: a monograph]. Moscow, Tsentr okhrany dikoi prirody Publ., 2016, 148 p.
  17. Díaz S., Pascual U., Stenseke M. et al. Assessing Nature's Contributions to People. Science, 2018, vol. 359, iss. 6373, pp. 270–272. URL: Link
  18. Zherdeva Yu.A. [Sense of place as a concept of social memory]. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal issledovanii kul'tury = International Journal of Cultural Research, 2015, no. 2, pp. 5–11. URL: Link (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8733 (Online)
ISSN 2073-1477 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 19, Iss. 11
November 2021

Archive