+7 495 989 9610, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Regional Economics: Theory and Practice
 

Prioritizing structural reform areas: Methodological aspects

Vol. 19, Iss. 5, MAY 2021

Received: 24 December 2020

Received in revised form: 16 March 2021

Accepted: 9 April 2021

Available online: 14 May 2021

Subject Heading: THEORY OF REGIONAL ECONOMY

JEL Classification: R11, R19, R58

Pages: 802–827

https://doi.org/10.24891/re.19.5.802

Konstantin V. KRINICHANSKII Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
kkrin@ya.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1225-7263

Aleksei S. LAVRENT'EV South Ural State University (National Research University) (SUSU (NRU), Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
allavr@yandex.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8843-9234

Subject. This article examines the theoretical basis for prioritizing structural reforms in countries and regions.
Objectives. The article aims to develop a methodology that helps identify and rank the areas of structural policy and structural reforms by their priority.
Methods. For the study, we used a regression analysis, gap analysis, benchmarking, cross-country and regional comparison, and graphical presentation of data.
Results. The article proposes a methodology of quantitative assessment and ordered estimate of the priorities of structural reforms. It shows maps of the priorities of the target region, namely the Chelyabinsk Oblast, and the group of regions that have a development pattern similar to the model region, or competitor regions.
Conclusions. The problem of increasing the rates of economic growth and well-being standard in the regions can be tackled through structural policies based on prioritizing the economy areas and concentrating resources in the selected ones.

Keywords: socio-economic development, structural policy, priorities, reform, benchmarking, Russian regions

References:

  1. Blanchard O., Giavazzi F. Macroeconomic Effects of Regulation and Deregulation in Goods and Labor Markets. NBER Working Paper Series, 2001, no. 8120. URL: Link
  2. Ebell M., Haefke C. Product Market Deregulation and the U.S. Employment Miracle. Review of Economic Dynamics, 2009, vol. 12, iss. 3, pp. 479–504. URL: Link
  3. Fang L., Rogerson R. Product Market Regulation and Market Work: A Benchmark Analysis. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2011, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 163–188. URL: Link
  4. Felbermayr G., Prat J. Product Market Regulation, Firm Selection, and Unemployment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2011, vol. 9, iss. 2, pp. 278–317. URL: Link
  5. Bouis R., Duval R., Eugster J. How Fast Does Product Market Reform Pay Off? New Evidence from Non-Manufacturing Industry Deregulation in Advanced Economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2020, vol. 48, iss. 1, pp. 198–217. URL: Link
  6. Cacciatore M., Fiori G. The Macroeconomic Effects of Goods and Labor Markets Deregulation. Review of Economic Dynamics, 2016, vol. 20, pp. 1–24. URL: Link
  7. Gerber T.P. Structural Change and Post-Socialist Stratification: Labor Market Transitions in Contemporary Russia. American Sociological Review, 2002, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 629–659. URL: Link
  8. Gimpelson V., Kapeliushnikov R. Polarization or Upgrading? Evolution of Employment in Transitional Russia. Russian Journal of Economics, 2016, vol. 2, iss. 2, pp. 192–218. URL: Link
  9. Scarpetta S. Assessing the Role of Labour Market Policies and Institutional Settings on Unemployment: A Cross-Country Study. OECD Economic Studies, 1996, vol. 26, pp. 43–98. URL: Link
  10. Dabla-Norris E., Ho G., Kyobe A. Structural Reforms and Productivity Growth in Emerging Market and Developing Economies. IMF Working Paper, 2016, no. 15. URL: Link
  11. Gouveia A.F., Santos S., Gonçalves I. The Impact of Structural Reforms on Productivity. The Role of the Distance to the Technological Frontier. OECD Productivity Working Papers, 2017, no. 8. URL: Link
  12. Lavrent'ev A.S., Krinichanskii K.V. [Methods of evaluation of the impact of structural policies on the macroeconomic parameters: Regression models and a partial equilibrium model]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2016, vol. 14, iss. 11, pp. 183–196. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  13. Lavrent'ev A.S., Krinichanskii K.V. [Methods of evaluation of the impact of structural policy on macroeconomic parameters: General equilibrium models]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2016, vol. 14, iss. 9, pp. 98–112. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  14. Brenton P., Saborowski C., Staritz C., von Uexkull E. Assessing the Adjustment Implications of Trade Policy Changes Using TRIST (Tariff Reform Impact Simulation Tool). Policy Research Working Paper, 2009, no. 5045. URL: Link
  15. Makarov V.L., Bakhtizin A.R., Sulakshin S.S. Primenenie vychislimykh modelei v gosudarstvennom upravlenii [Applying computational models in public administration]. Moscow, Nauchnyi ekspert Publ., 2007, 304 p.
  16. Benzell S.G., Goryunov E., Kazakova M. et al. Simulating Russia's and Other Large Economies' Challenging and Interconnected Transitions. NBER Working Paper Series, 2015, no. 21269. URL: Link
  17. Zubarev A.V., Kazakova M.V., Nesterova K.V. Mul'tiregional'naya vychislimaya model' obshchego ravnovesiya s perekryvayushchimisya pokoleniyami dlya rossiiskoi ekonomiki i ostal'nogo mira: monografiya [Multiregional computational general equilibrium-overlapping generations model for the Russian economy and the world: a monograph]. Moscow, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy Publ., 2018, 80 p.
  18. Fagiolo G., Roventini A. Macroeconomic Policy in DSGE and Agent-Based Models Redux: New Developments and Challenges Ahead. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2017, vol. 20, iss. 1. URL: Link
  19. Varga J., Veld J. The Potential Growth Impact of Structural Reforms in the EU. A Benchmarking Exercise. European Economy. Economic Papers, 2014, no. 541. URL: Link
  20. Murgasova Z., Ilahi N., Miniane J. et al. The Western Balkans: 15 Years of Economic Transition. IMF Working Paper, 2015, no. 172. URL: Link
  21. Kutsenko E.S., Eferin Ya.Yu. [“Whirlpools” and “Safe Harbors” in the dynamics of industrial specialization in Russian regions]. Forsait = Foresight and STI Governance, 2019, vol. 13, no 3, pp. 24–40. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  22. Krinichanskii K.V., Lavrent'ev A.S. [A comparative assessment of the economic development of regions: Methodological issues]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2017, vol. 15, iss. 10, pp. 1794–1817. (In Russ.) URL: Link

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8733 (Online)
ISSN 2073-1477 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 19, Iss. 6
June 2021

Archive