+7 495 989 9610, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Regional Economics: Theory and Practice
 

Abstracting and Indexing

РИНЦ
Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
Worldcat
LCCN Permalink
Google Scholar

Online available

EBSCOhost
Eastview
Elibrary
Biblioclub

Archiving

Cyberleninka (24 month OA embargo)

An empirical analysis of town-forming enterprises' corporate social responsibility: Evidence from the Volga Federal District

Vol. 18, Iss. 10, OCTOBER 2020

Received: 13 August 2020

Received in revised form: 2 September 2020

Accepted: 12 September 2020

Available online: 15 October 2020

Subject Heading: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONS

JEL Classification: L20, L21, L53, M14

Pages: 1894–1909

https://doi.org/10.24891/re.18.10.1894

Badykova I.R. Kazan National Research Technological University (KNRTU), Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation
Idelya.nizamova@gmail.com

ORCID id: not available

Subject. This article explores the determinants of social responsibility of backbone enterprises.
Objectives. The article aims to investigate the relationships between the socio-economic situation of the monotown where the backbone company operates, and corporate social responsibility (CSR).
Methods. For the study, I used a regression analysis and univariate analysis of spatial data. The rating estimates calculated using an original methodology are used as a CSR proxy (dependent variable).
Results. Presenting information about the current situation of backbone enterprises and monotowns in Russia, the article reveals the existence of relationships between the backbone enterprise's affiliation to a monotown with a certain socio-economic situation and the level of corporate social responsibility.
Conclusions. The situation of the backbone companies is likely to deteriorate. Increasing the level of social responsibility during a crisis seems unlikely.

Keywords: corporate social responsibility, systemic company, single-industry town, stakeholders, empirical analysis

References:

  1. Kryukova O.G., Arsenova E.A. [Global financial crisis impact on single-industry towns' economy]. Strategicheskie resheniya i risk-menedzhment = Strategic Decisions and Risk Management, 2010, no. 1, pp. 80–87. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  2. Alpatov G.Е., Iakushkina A.A. [The impact of the state of city-forming enterprises on single-industry towns stability]. Nauchnyi zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya: Ekonomika i ekologicheskii menedzhment, 2017, no. 2, pp. 8–17. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  3. Ackerman R.W. How Companies Respond to Social Demands. Harvard Business Review, 1973, vol. 51, iss. 4, pp. 88–98.
  4. Post J.E., Preston L.E., Sachs S. Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. Stanford, Stanford University Press Publ., 2002, 376 p.
  5. Bowen H.R. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New-York, Harper & Brothers, 1953, 276 p.
  6. McGuire J. Business and Society. New-York, McGraw-Hill, 1963, 312 p.
  7. Frederick W.C. From CSR1 to CSR2: The Maturing of Business-and-Society Thought. Business and Society, 1994, vol. 33, iss. 2, pp. 150–164. URL: Link
  8. Frederick W.C. Moving to CSR: What to Pack for the Trip. Business and Society, 1998, vol. 37, iss. 1, pp. 40–59. URL: Link
  9. Frederick W.C. Toward CSR3: Why Ethical Analysis is Indispensable and Unavoidable in Corporate Affairs. California Management Review, 1986, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 126–141. URL: Link
  10. Sethi S.P. Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework . California Management Review, 1975, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 58–64. URL: Link
  11. Votaw D. Genius Becomes Rare: A Comment on the Doctrine of Social Responsibility Pt. II. California Management Review, 1973, vol. 15, iss. 3, pp. 5–19. URL: Link
  12. Freeman R.E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, Pitman, 1984, 276 p.
  13. Freeman R.E. Response: Divergent Stakeholder Theory. The Academy of Management Review, 1999, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 233–236. URL: Link
  14. Freeman R.E., Harrison J.S., Wicks A.C. Managing for Stakeholders: Survival, Reputation, and Success. New Haven, Yale University Press, 2007, 200 p.
  15. Friedman A.L., Miles S. Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006, 330 p.
  16. Fassin Y. Stakeholder Management, Reciprocity and Stakeholder Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 2012, vol. 109, iss. 1, pp. 83–96. URL: Link
  17. Belyaeva I.Yu., Bataeva B.S., Danilova O.V. et al. Razvitie korporativnykh strategii i tekhnologii v rossiiskikh kompaniyakh: monografiya [The development of corporate strategies and technologies in Russian companies: a monograph]. Tver, Financial University under Government of Russian Federation Publ., 2019, 387 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8733 (Online)
ISSN 2073-1477 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 18, Iss. 10
October 2020

Archive