+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Regional Economics: Theory and Practice
 

Development of an approach to evaluating the effectiveness of regional government bodies in Russia

Vol. 14, Iss. 8, AUGUST 2016

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 18 March 2016

Received in revised form: 2 April 2016

Accepted: 13 April 2016

Available online: 16 August 2016

Subject Heading: SOCIOECONOMIC POLICY

JEL Classification: C67, D61, R15, R58

Pages: 33-50

Krinichanskii K.V. South Ural State University (National Research University), Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
kkrin@ya.ru

Subject The article studies and develops the methodology of Data Envelopment Analysis, or DEA, to analyze the effectiveness of decision-makers.
Objectives The purpose of article is to develop the foundations of DEA methodology, identify its strengths and weaknesses, develop alternative approaches to evaluate the activities of decision-makers, and use these approaches to develop a system for evaluating the performance of the executive authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation.
Results Pointing out certain disadvantages of the DEA methodology, I offer using some other metrics featured in the work, as indicators of the effectiveness, that can be applied successfully for the comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of decision-makers. In addition, I have developed and here present an approach to assess the dynamics of the effectiveness of such entities.
Relevance The proposed methodology is recommended to improve the adopted valuation methodologies of governance in the regions, both in general and in specific areas of management. The developed approaches can be applicable in the corporate sector, as well.

Keywords: input-output model, regional government, public sector, performance indicators

References:

  1. Farrell M.J. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1957, vol. 120, pp. 253–281. doi: 10.2307/2343100
  2. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision-Making Units. European Journal of Operation Research, 1978, vol. 2, iss. 6, pp. 429–444. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  3. Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W. Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 1984, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1078–1092.
  4. Afonso A., Schuknecht L., Tanzi V. Public Sector Efficiency: An international comparison. Public Choice, 2005, vol. 123, pp. 321–347. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  5. Musgrave R.A., Musgrave P.B. Public Finance in Theory and Practice, 5th ed. NY, McGraw-Hill, 1989, 664 p.
  6. Akhremenko A.S., Turovsky R.F., Reisinger W.M., Remington T.F., Colton T.J. Russia's Regions and Comparative Subnational Politics. L., NY, Routledge USA, 2013.
  7. Akhremenko A.S. Izmerenie sotsial'noi effektivnosti gosudarstva v regionakh Rossii: metodicheskie novatsii i empiricheskie otsenki (2008–2012 gg.) [Measuring the social effectiveness of the State in the regions of Russia: methodological innovation and empirical evaluation, 2008–2012]. Moscow, HSE Publ., 2014, 44 p.
  8. Deprins D., Simar L., Tulkens H. Measuring Labor-Efficiency in Post Offices. In: Marchand M., Pestieau P., Tulkens H. (eds) The Performance of Public Enterprises: Concepts and Measurement. Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1984, pp. 243–268.
  9. Vanden Eeckhaut P., Tulkens H., Jamar M.-A. Cost-Efficiency in Belgian Municipalities. In: Fried H., Lovell C., Schmidt S. (eds) The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, 1993, pp. 300–334.
  10. Fakin B., de Crombrugghe A. Fiscal Adjustment in Transition Economies: Social Transfers and the Efficiency of Public Spending: A comparison with OECD countries. Policy Research Working Paper 1803, Washington, DC, World Bank, 1997, 33 p.
  11. Evans D.B., Tandon A., Murray C.J.L., Lauer J.A. Comparative Efficiency of National Health Systems: Cross national econometric analysis. British Medical Journal, 2001, vol. 323, pp. 307–310.
  12. Lovell C.A.K., Schmidt P. A Comparison of Alternative Approaches to the Measurement of Productive Efficiency. In: Dogramaci A., Färe R. (eds) Applications of Modern Production Theory: Efficiency and Productivity. Boston, Kluwer, 1988, pp. 3–32.
  13. Seiford L.M., Thrall R.M. Recent Developments in DEA: The Mathematical Programming Approach to Frontier Analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 1990, vol. 4, pp. 7–38.
  14. Emrouznejad A., Parker B.R., Tavares G. Evaluation of Research in Efficiency and Productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2008, vol. 42, iss. 3, pp. 151–157. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2007.07.002
  15. Gattoufi S., Oral M., Reisman A. Data Envelopment Analysis Literature: A bibliography update (1951–2001). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2004, vol. 38, pp. 159–229. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0121(03)00023-5
  16. Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M., Tone K. Data Envelopment Analysis: A comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. Luxemburg, Springer Science & Business Media, LLC, 2007, 492 p.
  17. Fried H.O., Knox Lovell C.A., Schmidt S.S. (eds). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. NY, Oxford University Press, 2008, 656 p.
  18. Ray S. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory and Techniques for Economics and Operations Research. NY, Cambridge University Press, 2012, 366 p.
  19. Mantri J.K. (ed.) Research Methodology on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Universal-Publishers Boca Raton, 2008, 380 p.
  20. Murillo-Zamorano L.R. Economic Efficiency and Frontier Techniques. Journal of Economic Surveys, vol. 18, iss. 1, pp. 33–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2004.00215.x
  21. Aigner D.J., Lovell C.A.K., Schmidt P. Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Functions. Journal of Econometrics, 1977, vol. 6, pp. 21–37. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
  22. Meeusen W., van den Broeck J. Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error International. Economic Review, 1977, vol. 18, iss. 2, pp. 435–444. doi: 10.2307/2525757
  23. Greene W.H. The Econometric Approach to Efficiency Analysis. In: Fried H.O., Knox Lovell C.A., Schmidt P. (eds) The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth. NY, Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 68–119.
  24. Park B.U., Simar L., Zelenyuk V. Categorical Data in Local Maximum Likelihood: Theory and Applications to Productivity Analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2015, vol. 43, pp. 199–214. doi: 10.1007/s11123-014-0394-y
  25. Akhremenko A.S. Sotsial'naya effektivnost' gosudarstva v regionakh Rossii [The State's social efficiency in the regions of Russia]. Moscow, HSE Publ., 2013, 64 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8733 (Online)
ISSN 2073-1477 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 22, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive