+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Regional Economics: Theory and Practice
 

Foreign experience in the implementation of structural policies

Vol. 14, Iss. 2, FEBRUARY 2016

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 1 October 2015

Received in revised form: 21 October 2015

Accepted: 18 November 2015

Available online: 12 February 2016

Subject Heading: SCHOLAR DISPUTE

JEL Classification: I25, J21, O38, O43

Pages: 181-196

Krinichanskii K.V. South Ural State University (National Research University), Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
kkrin@ya.ru

Lavrent'ev A.S. South Ural State University (National Research University), Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
allavr@yandex.ru

Importance The article studies the problem of realization of structural reforms in foreign countries.
Objectives The paper aims to identify the best foreign practices to implement structural policies.
Methods For the study, we used a comparative analysis.
Results We identified factors and conditions for successful implementation of structural reform.
Conclusions and Relevance We conclude that it is advisable to use the program approach for successful implementation of structural policies. We recommend to structure reform packages in the areas of labor market, human capital development, resources relocation, governance, as well as use tax (indirect) encouragement of small and medium-sized enterprises.

Keywords: economic development, structural reform, education, labor productivity, technological change

References:

  1. Polterovich V.M. Elementy teorii reform [Elements of the theory of reform]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2007, 447 p.
  2. Mau V. Ekonomika i politika v 2011: global'nyi krizis i poisk novoi modeli rosta [Economy and Policy in 2011: Global Crisis and Search for a New Model of Growth]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2012, no. 2, pp. 4–26.
  3. Guriev S., Plekhanov A., Sonin K. Ekonomicheskii mekhanizm syr'evoi modeli razvitiya [Economics of Development Based on Commodity Revenues]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2010, no. 3, pp. 4–23.
  4. Kudrin A., Sergienko O. Posledstviya krizisa i perspektivy sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii [Consequences of the Crisis and Prospects of Russia's Social and Economic Development]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2011, no. 3, pp. 4–19.
  5. Gurvich E. Dolgosrochnye perspektivy rossiiskoi ekonomiki [Long-Term Development Prospects for Russia's Economy]. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy, 2013, no. 3, pp. 7–32.
  6. Agnello L., Castro V., Jalles J., Sousa R. What Determines the Likelihood of Structural Reforms? European Journal of Political Economy, 2015, vol. 37, pp. 129–145. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.10.007
  7. Drazen A., Grilli V. The Benefit of Crises for Economic Reforms. American Economic Review, 1993, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 598–607.
  8. Christiansen L., Schindler M., Tressel T. Growth and Structural Reforms: A New Assessment. Journal of International Economics, 2013, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 347–356. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.07.008
  9. Bouis R., Duval R. Raising Potential Growth after the Crisis: A Quantitative Assessment of the Potential Gains from Various Structural Reforms. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 2011, no. 835. doi: 10.1787/5kgk9qj18s8n-en
  10. Bouis R., Causa O., Demmou L., Duval R. How Quickly Does Structural Reform Pay Off? An Empirical Analysis of the Short-Term Effects of Unemployment Benefit Reform. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 2012, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1−12. doi: 10.1186/2193-9004-1-12
  11. Berger H., Danninger S. The Employment Effects of Labor and Product Market Deregulation and Their Implications for Structural Reform. IMF Staff Papers, 2007, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 591−619.
  12. Bourlès R., Cette G., Lopez J., Mairesse J., Nicoletti G. The Impact on Growth of Easing Regulations. CESifo DICE Report, 2010, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 8−12.
  13. Cacciatore M. International Trade and Macroeconomic Dynamics with Labor Market Frictions. Journal of International Economics, 2014, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 17−30. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.01.008
  14. Bassanini A. Training, Wages and Employment Security: An Empirical Analysis on European Data. Applied Economics Letters, 2006, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 523−527.
  15. Bassanini A., Duval R. Unemployment, Institutions, and Reform Complementarities: Re-Assessing the Aggregate Evidence for OECD Countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2009, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 40−59. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grp004
  16. Everaert L., Schule W. Structural Reforms in the Euro Area: Economic Impact and Role of Synchronization across Markets and Countries. IMF Working Paper, 2006, no. 06/137.
  17. Berger T., Everaert G. Is the Impact of Labor Taxes on Unemployment Asymmetric? Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2013, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 143−154. doi: 10.1017/S136510051100006X
  18. Bayoumi T., Laxton D., Pesenti P. Benefits and Spillovers of Greater Competition in Europe: A Macroeconomic Assessment. NBER Working Paper, 2004, no. 10416.
  19. Gomes S., Jacquinot P., Mohr M., Pisani M. Structural Reforms and Macroeconomic Performance in the Euro Area Countries: A Model-Based Assessment. International Finance, 2013, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 23−44. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2362.2013.12025.x
  20. Anderson D., Khant B., Snadden S. Fiskal'naya konsolidatsiya v evrozone: kak strukturnye reformy mogut oblegchit' posledstviya [Fiscal Consolidation in the Euro Area: How Much Can Structural Reforms Ease the Pain?]. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii: obrazovanie, nauka, novaya ekonomika = International Organizations Research Journal, 2014, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 19–47.
  21. Eggertsson G., Ferrero A., Raffo A. Can Structural Reforms Help Europe? Journal of Monetary Economics, 2014, vol. 61, no. C, pp. 2–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2013.11.006
  22. Kelly E., McGuinness S. Impact of the Great Recession on Unemployed and NEET Individuals' Labor Market Transitions in Ireland. Economic Systems, 2015, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 59–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2014.06.004
  23. Polidano C., Tabasso D. Making It Real: The Benefits of Workplace Learning in Upper-Secondary Vocational Education and Training Courses. Economics of Education Review, 2014, vol. 42, no. C, pp. 130–146. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.06.003
  24. Bassanini A., Brunello G. Barriers to Entry, Deregulation and Workplace Training: A Theoretical Model with Evidence from Europe. European Economic Review, 2011, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1152−1176. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2011.05.004
  25. Bassanini A., Nunziata L., Venn D. Job Protection Legislation and Productivity Growth in OECD Countries. Economic Policy, 2009, vol. 24, pp. 349−402.
  26. Bassanini A., Venn D. The Impact of Labour Market Policies on Productivity in OECD Countries. International Productivity Monitor, 2008, vol. 17, pp. 3−15.
  27. Castellacci F., Lie C. Do the Effects of R&D Tax Credits Vary across Industries? A Meta-Regression Analysis. Research Policy, 2015, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 819–832. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.010
  28. Oslund A. Pochemu mogut snizit'sya tempy rosta v stranakh s razvivayushcheisya rynochnoi ekonomikoi? [Why Growth in Emerging Economies Is Likely to Fall?]. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy, 2014, no. 1, pp. 7–34.
  29. Acemoglu D. The Form of Property Rights: Oligarchic vs Democratic Societies. NBER Working Paper. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2003, no. 10037. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.457724
  30. Montmartin B., Herrera M. Internal and External Effects of R&D Subsidies and Fiscal Incentives: Empirical Evidence Using Spatial Dynamic Panel Models. Research Policy, 2015, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1065–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.013

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8733 (Online)
ISSN 2073-1477 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 22, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive