Regional Economics: Theory and Practice

Abstracting and Indexing

Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
LCCN Permalink
Google Scholar

Online available



Cyberleninka (24 month OA embargo)

Evaluation of regional ecological and socio-economic well-being of the Krasnoyarsk Krai: a new approach

Vol. 13, Iss. 34, SEPTEMBER 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 27 April 2015

Received in revised form: 28 May 2015

Accepted: 9 June 2015

Available online: 30 September 2015


JEL Classification: 

Pages: 30-40

Pyzhev A.I. Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation

Pyzheva Y.I. Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation

Importance The article deals with the problems of complex measurement of the well-being of inhabitants of countries and their regions. The paper considers the indicators relating to growth of national income, as well as the social and environmental conditions of human life.
     Objectives The aim of the paper is to develop an integrated assessment tool for socio-ecological and economic well-being of the people of the Krasnoyarsk Krai.
     Methods We used a methodology applied in the calculation of the true measure of progress to assess 17 out of 26 indicators, in accordance with the specifics of the Russian statistics data sets.
     Results We have identified a gap in the dynamics of the GRP and the true measure of progress of the Krasnoyarsk Krai, which is 30-35%. We prove that the population of the region is substantially damaged by environmental violations, and this cannot be offset by economic growth. The social factors have less impact on the level of a true measure of progress. We note that the estimation of the true measure of progress may be overstated because of the lack of basic data for calculation.
     Conclusions and Relevance We point out that the results of this research are intermediate, so that the justification of the method needs to be continued. We provide certain proposals for improving the system of State statistics for more reliable baseline data and evaluating the true measure of progress as an important and promising instrument for economic, social and environmental policies at the regional level.

Keywords: ecological, social, economic, well-being, Genuine Progress Indicator, Gross Regional Product, public welfare


  1. Costanza R., Erickson J., Fligger K., Adams A., Adams C., Altschuler B., Balter S., Fisher B., Hike J., Kelly J., Kerr T., McCauley M., Montone K., Rauch M., Schmiedeskamp K., Saxton D., Sparacino L., Tusinski W., Williams L. Estimates of the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) for Vermont, Chittenden County and Burlington, from 1950 to 2000. Ecological Economics, 2004, vol. 51, no. 1-2, pp. 139–155.
  2. Costanza R., Kubiszewski I., Giovannini E., Lovins H., McGlade J., Pickett K.E., Vala K.R., Roberts D., De Vogli R., Wilkinson R. Development: time to leave GDP behind. Nature, 2014, no. 505, pp. 283–285. doi: 10.1038/505283a
  3. Bobylev S.N., Solov'eva S.V., Sitkina K.S. Indikatory ustoichivogo razvitiya Ural'skogo regiona [Sustainable development indicators of the Ural region]. Ekonomika regiona = The Region’s Economy, 2013, no. 2, pp. 10–17.
  4. Glazyrina I.P., Zabelina I.A., Klevakina E.A. Uroven' ekonomicheskogo razvitiya i raspredelenie ekologicheskoi nagruzki mezhdu regionami RF [Economic development and the environmental impact disparities among Russia's regions]. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = The Journal of the New Economic Association, 2010, no. 7, pp. 70–88.
  5. Zabelina I.A., Klevakina E.A. Otsenka ekologicheskikh zatrat v proizvedennom valovom regional'nom produkte [Assessing the share of environmental costs in GRP]. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya = Region: Economics and Sociology, 2011, no. 2, pp. 223–232.
  6. Zabelina I.A., Klevakina E.A. Otsenka i sravnitel'nyi analiz pokazatelei kachestva ekonomicheskogo rosta v razreze ekologicheskikh tem [Quality of growth indicators in the context of environmental themes: estimation and comparative analysis]. Vestnik Zabaikal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Transbaikal State University, 2014, no. 8, pp. 103–115.
  7. Klevakina E.A., Zabelina I.A. Mezhregional'noe neravenstvo v Rossii: ekologicheskii aspekt [Regional disparities in Russia: an ecological aspect]. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya = Region: Economics and Sociology, 2012, no. 3, pp. 203–213.
  8. Guriev S., Plekhanov A., Sonin K. Ekonomicheskii mekhanizm syr'evoi modeli razvitiya [Economics of development based on commodity revenues]. Voprosy Economiki, 2010, no. 3, pp. 4–23.
  9. Druckman A., Bradley P., Papathanasopoulou E., Jackson T. Measuring progress towards carbon reduction in the UK. Ecological Economics, 2008, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 594–604.
  10. Lawn Ph., Clarke M. Comparing Victoria’s genuine progress indicator with that of the Rest-of-Australia. Journal of Economic and Social Policy, 2006, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–23.
  11. Posner S.M., Costanza R. A summary of ISEW and GPI studies at multiple scales and new estimates for Baltimore City, Baltimore County, and the State of Maryland. Ecological Economics, 2011, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 1972–1980. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.004
  12. Kubiszewski I., Costanza R., Franco C., Lawn P., Talberth J., Jackson T., Aylmer C. Beyond GDP: measuring and achieving global genuine progress. Ecological Economics, 2013, no. 93, pp. 57–68.
  13. Hamilton C. The genuine progress indicator methodological developments and results from Australia. Ecological Economics, 1999, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 13–28. doi: 10.1016 / S0921-8009 (98) 00099-8
  14. Bagstad K.J., Shammin M.R. Can the genuine progress indicator better inform sustainable regional progress? A case study for Northeast Ohio. Ecological Indicators, 2012, no. 18, pp. 330–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.11.026
  15. Danilishin B.M., Veklich O.A. Genuine progress indicator as an adequate macroeconomic indicator of public welfare. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2010, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 644–650.
  16. Aganbegyan A.G. Skol'ko stoit zhizn' cheloveka? [What is the value of a human life?]. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy, 2014, no. 1, pp. 54–66.
  17. Ryumina E.V. Ekonomicheskii analiz ushcherba ot ekologicheskikh narushenii: monografiya [An economic analysis of the damage from ecological violations: a monograph]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2009, 331 p.
  18. Gil'mundinov V.M., Kazantseva L.K., Tagaeva T.O. Problemy okhrany vodnykh i atmosfernykh resursov Rossii: monografiya [Problems of protection of water and atmospheric resources of Russia: a monograph]. Novosibirsk, Institute of Economy and Organization of Industrial Production of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2011, 166 p.
  19. Gilmundinov V.M., Kazantseva L.K., Tagaeva T.O. Pollution and its influence on health of population in Russia. Regional Research of Russia, 2014, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–9.
  20. Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B. et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, no. 387, pp. 253–260.
  21. Talberth J., Bohara A. Economic openness and green GDP. Ecological Economics, 2006, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 743–758.

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-8733 (Online)
ISSN 2073-1477 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 18, Iss. 6
June 2020