Subject. This article discusses the effectiveness of customs authorities in ensuring the economic security of the Russian Federation. Objectives. The article aims to develop a scientific methodology for assessing the effectiveness of customs authorities, providing information support for management decisions to counter foreign economic threats. Methods. For the study, we used a systems analysis, methods of intelligent modeling, data analysis and visualization tools, as well as risk-oriented management customs concepts. Results. The article analyzes the customs authorities activities , combining the precision of computer modeling, fuzzy logic flexibility, and transparency of explainable artificial intelligence. Conclusions. The substantiated assessment methodology can allow identifying bottlenecks in the regulatory measures applied and formulating well-founded managerial decisions to minimize threats and strengthen economic security. The practical significance of the research lies in the mathematical support and modeling of the dynamic evaluation of the customs authorities performance.
Mergel I., Edelmann N., Haug N. Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 2019, vol. 36, iss. 4. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Coglianese С. The limits of performance-based regulation. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2017, no. 50U. DOI: 10.36646/mjlr.50.3.limits
Wirz C.D., Demuth J.L., Bostrom A. et al. (Re)Conceptualizing trustworthy AI: A foundation for change. Artificial Intelligence, 2025, vol. 342, iss. 8. DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2025.104309
Calzarossa M.C., Giudici P., Zieni R. An assessment framework for explainable AI with applications to cybersecurity. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2025, vol. 58, iss. 5. DOI: 10.1007/s10462-025-11141-w
Dang L.M., Wang H.X., Li Y.F. et al. Explainable artificial intelligence: A comprehensive review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2021, vol. 55, iss. 1, pp. 3503–3568. DOI: 10.1007/s10462-021-10088-y
Davydov R.V. [Assessment of the customs administration efficiency as a tool for the development of the EAEU]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya, 2021, no. 4, pp. 7–35. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17323/1999-5431-2021-0-4-7-35 EDN: BPCLKV
Bobrova A.V., Garipov R.I.I. Universal system of indicators for assessing the activities of customs authorities. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 2018, vol. 9, iss. 6, pp. 1910–1923. DOI: 10.14505/jarle.v9.6(36).05 EDN: AXASRA
Oğuz S. The impact of customs procedures on global competitiveness: An investigation with structural equation modelling. Fiscaoeconomia, 2024, vol. 8, iss. 3, pp. 1264–1278. DOI: 10.25295/fsecon.1458266 EDN: BSUFNW
Koshkodan A.V. [Assessment of the effectiveness of customs authorities in the Russian Federation: Problems and prospects]. Aktual'nye issledovaniya, 2024, no. 26-2, pp. 56–60. (In Russ.) EDN: FJWZAU
Knyshov A.V. [Problematic issues and recommendations for improvement of assessment of efficiency of activity of customs bodies of Russia]. Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal, 2017, no. 2. EDN: XXILDB
Migel A.A., Shereshov A.V., Baranova Yu.S. et al. [Modern threats to the economic security of Russia: Comprehensive assessments and new tasks for the customs authorities]. Russian Economic Bulletin, 2023, vol. 6, iss. 4, pp. 370–376. (In Russ.) EDN: MNDOOG
Goremykina G.I., Gupanova Yu.E. [Intellectual measurement and evaluation of the results of customs authorities' activities]. Upravlenie, vol. 11, iss. 1, pp. 16–28. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.26425/2309-3633-2023-11-1-16-28 EDN: GUVOSH
Gupanova Yu.E., Goremykina G.I. [Managerial analysis and assessment of customs authorities' performance]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika, 2020, vol. 19, iss. 11, pp. 2068–2092. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24891/ea.19.11.2068 EDN: CEKMLP
Pavlova N.S., Shastitko A.E. [Microfoundations of dominance of fundamentalism in economic policy: Is there an antidote?]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2024, no. 1, pp. 94–114. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2024-1-94-114 EDN: FODHLS
Jones P.E., Roelofsma P.H.M.P. The potential for social contextual and group biases in team decisionmaking: Biases, conditions and psychological mechanisms. Ergonomics, 2000, vol. 43, iss. 8, pp. 1129–1152. DOI: 10.1080/00140130050084914
Mamdani E.H., Assilian S. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1975, vol. 7, iss. 1, pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2
Piegat A. Fuzzy Modeling and Control. Heidelberg, Physica Heidelberg Publ., 2011, 798 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7908-1824-6
Post E.L. Formal reductions of the general combinatorial decision problem. American Journal of Mathematics, 1943, vol. 65, iss. 2, pp. 197–215. DOI: 10.2307/2371809
Nitezhuk M.S., Arshinskii L.V. [Nonclassical logics in rule-based system verification problem]. Informatsionnye i matematicheskie tekhnologii v nauke i upravlenii, 2020, no. 2, pp. 36–51. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.38028/ESI.2020.18.2.003 EDN: FWBYJZ
Dolinina O.N., Kushnikov V.A. [Methods and technologies for quality assurance of intelligent decision-making systems]. Programmnaya inzheneriya, 2021, vol. 12, iss. 4, pp. 189–199. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17587/prin.12.189-199 EDN: BEQQUS
Schoeffer J., Jakubik J., Vössing M. et al. AI Reliance and decision quality: Fundamentals, interdependence, and the effects of interventions. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2025, no. 82, pp. 471–501. DOI: 10.1613/jair.1.15873
