+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Gig economy: Formalization and analysis of key elements using a tuple model

ISSUE 2, FEBRUARY 2025

Received: 29 August 2024

Accepted: 2 October 2024

Available online: 14 February 2025

Subject Heading: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY

JEL Classification: С01, J01

Pages: 77-90

https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.21.2.77

Dmitrii M. NAZAROV Ural State University of Economics (USUE), Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
slup2005@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5847-9718

Subject. The article addresses the gig economy as a modern form of labor organization and the use of digital platforms.
Objectives. The study aims to define the essence of the gig economy, analyze interrelations of its elements, assess the degree of its impact on the labor market.
Methods. The study employs mathematical methods of research.
Results. I developed a methodological approach based on the use of a tuple model. It enables to structure and formalize various aspects of the gig economy: types of employment, the role of digital platforms, social implications. The paper presents my own definition of the gig economy, defines the role of digital platforms in managing supply and demand in the labor market.
Conclusions. The use of the tuple model can contribute to the development of programs to improve working conditions.

Keywords: gig economy, digital platform, temporary employment, tuple model, labor relations

References:

  1. Bent P.H. Historical Perspectives on Precarious Work: The Cases of Egypt and India under British Imperialism. Global Labour Journal, 2017, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 3–16. URL: Link
  2. Bosch G. Towards a New Standard Employment Relationship in Western Europe. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 2004, vol. 42, iss. 4, pp. 617–636. URL: Link
  3. Kaine S., Josserand E. The Organisation and Experience of Work in the Gig Economy. Journal of Industrial Relations, 2019, vol. 61, iss. 4, pp. 479–501. URL: Link
  4. Braverman H. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York, Monthly Review Press, 1998, 338 p.
  5. Ahsan M. Entrepreneurship and Ethics in the Sharing Economy: A Critical Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 2020, vol. 161, iss. 1, pp. 19–33. URL: Link
  6. McGaughey E. Taylorooism: When Network Technology Meets Corporate Power. Industrial Relations Journal, 2018, vol. 49, iss. 5-6, pp. 459–472. URL: Link
  7. Sutherland W., Jarrahi M.H., Dunn M., Nelson S.B. Work Precarity and Gig Literacies in Online Freelancing. Work, Employment and Society, 2020, vol. 34, iss. 3, pp. 457–475. URL: Link
  8. Digilina O.B., Teslenko I.B. [Transformation of the labor market in the context of digitalization]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo = RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Economics. Management. Law, 2019, vol. 4, part 2, pp. 166–180. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  9. Gandini A. Labour Process Theory and the Gig Economy. Human Relations, 2019, vol. 72, iss. 6, pp. 1039–1056. URL: Link
  10. Ashford S.J., Caza B.B., Reid E.M. From Surviving to Thriving in the Gig Economy: A Research Agenda for Individuals in the New World of Work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2018, vol. 38, pp. 23–41. URL: Link
  11. Brawley A.M. The Big, Gig Picture: We Can’t Assume the Same Constructs Matter. Industrial and Organisational Psychology, 2017, vol. 10, iss. 4, pp. 687–696. URL: Link
  12. Duggan J., Sherman U., Carbery R., McDonnell A. Algorithmic Management and App-Work in the Gig Economy: A Research Agenda for Employment Relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 2020, vol. 30, iss. 1, pp. 114–132. URL: Link
  13. Wood A.J., Graham M., Lehdonvirta V., Hjorth I. Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy. Work, Employment and Society, 2019, vol. 33, iss. 1, pp. 56–75. URL: Link
  14. Wu Q., Zhang H., Li Z., Liu K. Labor Control in the Gig Economy: Evidence from Uber in China. Journal of Industrial Relations, 2019, vol. 61, iss. 4, pp. 574–596. URL: Link
  15. Bobkov V.N., Chernykh E.A. Platform Employment – the Scale and Evidence of Instability. Mir novoi ekonomiki = The World of New Economy, 2020, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 6–15. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  16. Gramano E. Digitalisation and Work: Challenges from the Platform-Economy. Contemporary Social Science, 2020, vol. 15, iss. 4, pp. 476–488. URL: Link
  17. Healy J., Nicholson D., Pekarek A. Should We Take the Gig Economy Seriously? Labour and Industry, 2017, vol. 27, iss. 3, pp. 232–248. URL: Link
  18. Friedman G.C. Workers without Employers: Shadow Corporations and the Rise of the Gig Economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2014, vol. 2, iss. 2, pp. 171–188. URL: Link
  19. Banik N., Padalkar М. [The spread of gig economy: Trends and effects]. Forsait = Foresight and STI Governance, 2021, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 19–29. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  20. Romanets I.I., Verbovskii G.D. [Gig-economy as a new form of market relations]. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika: perspektivy razvitiya i sovershenstvovaniya = Innovative Economy: Prospects for Development and Improvement, 2021, no. 1, pp. 186–192. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  21. Lapidus L.V., Polyakova Yu.M. [Hygonomics as a new socio-economic model: The development of freelancing and crowdsourcing]. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiiskoi akademii nauk = Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2018, no. 6, pp. 73–89. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  22. Nazarov D.M. Metodologiya nechetko-mnozhestvennoi otsenki vliyaniya implitsitnykh faktorov: monografiya [Methodology for fuzzy-multiple assessment of the influence of implicit factors: a monograph]. Saarbrücken, LAP LAMBERT, 2016, 237 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

ISSUE 7
JULY 2026

Archive

Видите ошибку в отчестве? Отключите перевод, это английская версия сайта!