+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

A comparative analysis of the corporate culture of foreign and Russian military-industrial complex enterprises

Vol. 17, Iss. 1, JANUARY 2021

Received: 22 October 2020

Received in revised form: 10 November 2020

Accepted: 30 November 2020

Available online: 14 January 2021

Subject Heading: Foreign experience

JEL Classification: G38, L12, L60, M05, M14

Pages: 184–204

https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.17.1.184

Sergei B. ZAINULLIN Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russian Federation
law_union@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9818-4706

Ol'ga A. ZAINULLINA Moscow University for Industry and Finance Synergy (Synergy University), Moscow, Russian Federation
korotkova.oa@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0701-6913

Subject. The military-industrial complex is a fundamental industry of the Russian economy. On the one hand, it ensures the national security, and, on the other hand, makes the military-industrial enterprises implement the culture, which is loyal to the State and society, being driven by sanctions and internal factors.
Objectives. We herein conduct the comparative analysis of the corporate culture practices in Russia and leading countries exporting weapons in order to identify applications and concepts that exist in Russia.
Methods. The study relies upon such methods as dialectical, structural analysis, traditional techniques for economic analysis and synthesis, and the modeling method.
Results. We conducted the comparative analysis of the way the corporate culture of military enterprises evolves in Russia. We review global practices of using the model in the largest military corporations, discovered their similarities and differences of the applicable directions and concepts.
Conclusions and Relevance. The human rights protection policy, corruption counteraction policy, discrimination counteraction, protection of information and assets, insider risk counteraction are implemented in a common and versatile manner. These approaches are used by major corporations in the USA, EU, United Kingdom and Russia. In the mean time, the Russian companies do not focus on special rights of minorities and inclusivity, which are so popular in the USA, EU, and the Commonwealth of States.

Keywords: corporate security, corporate culture, corruption counteraction, conflict of interests, corporate ethics, social policy

References:

  1. Deal T., Kennedy A.A. Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1982.
  2. Schein E. Organizatsionnaya kul'tura i liderstvo [Organizational Culture and Leadership]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2002, 336 p.
  3. Kotter J.P., Heskett J.L. Corporate Culture and Performance. New York, Free Press, 1992, 214 p.
  4. Schwartz H., Davis S. Matching Corporate Culture and Business Strategy. Organizational Dynamics, 1981, vol. 10, iss. 1, pp. 30–48. URL: Link90010-3
  5. Jaques E. The Changing Culture of a Factory. New York, Dryden Press, 1952, 251 р.
  6. Kvachko A.V. [Value of corporate culture in group of companies]. Elektronnyi nauchno-prakticheskii zhurnal “Ekonomika i menedzhment innovatsionnykh tekhnologii”, 2014, no. 3, part 2. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  7. Sonnenfeld J.A. Corporate Views of the Public Interest. Boston, Auburn House, 1981.
  8. Handy N.C. Understanding Organizations. Penguin Adult, 1993, 445 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive