+7 495 989 9610, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Corporate culture as a driver of the corporate security of foreign military-industrial enterprises

Vol. 16, Iss. 12, DECEMBER 2020

Received: 22 October 2020

Received in revised form: 10 November 2020

Accepted: 25 November 2020

Available online: 15 December 2020

Subject Heading: Foreign experience

JEL Classification: G38, M05, M14, L12, L60

Pages: 2363–2380

https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.16.12.2363

Zainullin S.B. Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russian Federation
law_union@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9818-4706

Zainullina O.A. Moscow University for Industry and Finance Synergy (Synergy University), Moscow, Russian Federation
korotkova.oa@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0701-6913

Subject. The military-industrial complex is one of the core industries in any economy. It ensures both the economic and global security of the State. However, the economic security of MIC enterprises strongly depends on the State and other stakeholders.
Objectives. We examine key factors of corporate culture in terms of theoretical and practical aspects. The article identifies the best implementation of corporate culture that has a positive effect on the corporate security in the MIC of the USA, the United Kingdom, the European Union, Japan ans China.
Methods. The study employs dialectical method of research, combines the historical and logic unity, structural analysis, traditional techniques of economic analysis and synthesis.
Results. We performed the comparative analysis of corporate culture models and examined how they are used by the MIC corporations with respect to international distinctions.
Conclusions and Relevance. The State is the main stakeholder of the MIC corporations, since it acts as the core customer represented by the military department. It regulates and controls operations. The State is often a major shareholder of such corporations. Employees are also important stakeholders. Hence, trying to satisfy stakeholders' needs by developing the corporate culture, corporations mitigate their key risks and enhance their corporate security.

Keywords: corporate security, corporate culture, corruption counteraction, conflict of interests, corporate ethics

References:

  1. Deal T., Kennedy A.A. Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1982.
  2. Schein E.H. Organizatsionnaya kul'tura i liderstvo [Organizational Culture and Leadership]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2002, 336 p.
  3. Kotter J.P., Heskett J.L. Corporate Culture and Performance. New York, Free Press, 1992, 214 p.
  4. Schwartz H., Davis S. Matching Corporate Culture and Business Strategy. Organizational Dynamics, 1981, vol. 10, iss. 1, pp. 30–48. URL: Link90010-3
  5. Jaques E. The Changing Culture of a Factory. New York, Dryden Press, 1952, 251 p.
  6. Kvachko A.V. [Value of corporate culture in group of companies]. Ekonomika i menedzhment innovatsionnykh tekhnologii, 2014, no. 3-2. URL: Link
  7. Sonnenfeld J.A. Corporate Views of the Public Interest: Perceptions of the Forest Products Industry. Boston, Auburn House, 1981.
  8. Handy N.C. Understanding Organizations. Penguin Adult, 1993, 445 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 17, Iss. 1
January 2021

Archive