+7 495 989 9610, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»






National Interests: Priorities and Security

Abstracting and Indexing

Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
LCCN Permalink
Google Scholar

Online available



Cyberleninka (24 month OA embargo)

Transformation of education as a metatrend of the digital economy

Vol. 16, Iss. 10, OCTOBER 2020

Received: 9 July 2020

Received in revised form: 25 July 2020

Accepted: 12 August 2020

Available online: 15 October 2020


JEL Classification: D11, D85, J26, I25, O33

Pages: 1960–1979


Egina N.A. National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University (MRSU), Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russian Federation


Zemskova E.S. National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University (MRSU), Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russian Federation


Subject. The study focuses on the impact of the digital economy determinants of the education transformation.
Objectives. The article provides our own approach treating the education capital as a specific asset of the digital economy, which has an acceleration effect and sets up new trends in education through integrative networks.
Methods. The study is based on principles of the systems integration, cross-disciplinary and multidisciplinary approaches.
Results. The socio-economic progress was found to be determined with properties of human capital, which are solely specific to the digital economy. In new circumstances, it gets more important for actors of global, national, corporate and social networks to more actively cooperate within distributed networks in order to train high professionals, who would have skills in information networks. Thus, they would raise a new form of human capital – the capital of network education (network-based education capital). We describe positive externalities that arise when the educational sector joins communication processes. We illustrate how educational forms evolves, which are typical of a certain phase of the socio-economic development. The education capital was discovered to grow into a specific asset generating the quasi-rent and working as a social ladder only provided more actors are involved into the network.
Conclusions and Relevance. Studying the evolution of educational forms through the cross-disciplinary method, we discovered the need for a system approach, which would help substantiate its transformation in the time of the digital economy, and the emergence of network-based education. These are technologies and tools of the digital economy that become unique factors generating the acceleration effect of the educational capital and ensuring the use of diverse network effects for the formation of intellectual capital and their social transformation.

Keywords: digital economy, education, network capital, acceleration effect, competencies


  1. Yegina N.A., Zemskova E.S., Gorin V.A., Stepanova D.I. Applying Consumer Behavior Theory in the Context of the Digital Transformation of the Economy. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2019, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 341–347.
  2. Solow R. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1956, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 65–94. URL: Link
  3. Schultz T.W. Capital Formation by Education. Journal of Political Economy, 1960, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 571–583. URL: Link
  4. Becker G. Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 1962, vol. 70, no. 5, part 2, pp. 9–49. Stable URL: Link
  5. Galbraith J.K. Novoe industrial'noe obshchestvo [The New Industrial State]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1969, 479 p.
  6. Myrdal G. Sovremennye problemy “tret'ego mira” [Russian edition. Contemporary Problems of the Third World]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1972, 767 p.
  7. Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya [The Coming Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting]. Moscow, Academia Publ., 2004, 944 p.
  8. Masuda Y. The Information Society as Postindustrial Society. Bethesda, MD, World Futures Society, 1981, 171 p.
  9. Toffler A. Tret'ya volna [The Third Wave]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2004, 784 p.
  10. Romer Р. Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 1986, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1002–1037. URL: Link
  11. Lucas R. On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1988, vol. 22, pp. 3–42. URL: Link
  12. Moreno J. Who Shall Survive? Foundations of Sociometry. In: Group Psychotherapy and Sociodrama. Beacon, NY, Beacon House, 1953, 763 р.
  13. Granovetter M. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 1985, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 481–510. Stable URL: Link
  14. Dubini P., Aldrich H. Personal and Extended Networks are Central to the Entrepreneurial Process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1991, vol. 6, iss. 5, pp. 305–313. URL: Link90021-5
  15. Jones C., Hesterly W., Borgatti S. A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 1997, vol. 22, iss. 4, pp. 911–945. URL: Link
  16. Becker G. A Treatise on the Family. Harvard University Press, 1991, 424 p.
  17. Alchian A.A., Demsetz H. Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization. The American Economic Review, 1972, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 777–795. Stable URL: Link
  18. Bourdieu P. Espace Social et Pouvoir Symbolique. Paris, Editions de Minuit, 1987, 392 p.
  19. Castells M. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul'tura [The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture]. Moscow, State University – Higher School of Economics Publ., 2000, 608 p.
  20. Reinert E.S. Kak bogatye strany stali bogatymi, i pochemu bednye strany ostayutsya bednymi [How Rich Countries Got Rich… and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor]. Moscow, State University – Higher School of Economics Publ., 2011, 437 p.
  21. Knowles M.S. The Modern Practice of Adult Education: from Pedagogy to Andragogy. New York, Association Press, 1980, 400 p.
  22. Eisen M.-J. Peer-Based Learning: A New-Old Alternative to Professional Development. Adult Learning, 2001, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 9–10. URL: Link
  23. Patarakin E.D. Sotsial'nye vzaimodeistviya i setevoe obuchenie 2.0 [Social interactions and network learning 2.0]. Moscow, Sovremennye tekhnologii v obrazovanii i kul'ture Publ., 2009, 176 p.
  24. Vasilevskaya E.V. [Network mechanisms for the development of professional competence of teachers]. Nepreryvnoe pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie.RU = Continuous Pedagogical Education.RU, 2013, no. 5. (In Russ.)
  25. Asmolov A.G. [Complex person as a challenge to pedagogy of opportunities]. Povolzhskii pedagogicheskii poisk = Volga Pedagogical Search, 2018, no. 1, pp. 13–19. (In Russ.)
  26. Kicherova M.N., Zyuban E.V., Muslimova E.O. [Non-formal education: international experience of recognition of competences]. Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow = Educational Issues / Educational Studies Moscow, 2020, no. 1, pp. 126–158. (In Russ.)
  27.  Baskakova M.E., Soboleva I.V. [New dimensions of functional illiteracy in the digital economy]. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow, 2019, no. 1, pp. 244–263. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  28. Dyatlov S.A., Khankhunova A.Yu. [Features of transformation of system of reproduction of human capital in the digital economy]. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University, 2019, no. 2, pp. 14–17. (In Russ.)
  29. Egina N.A. [Transformation of the consumer behavior model in the digital economy]. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit, 2019, vol. 25, iss. 9, pp. 1971–1986. (In Russ.) URL: Link

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 16, Iss. 10
October 2020