+7 495 989 9610, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Abstracting and Indexing

РИНЦ
Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
Worldcat
LCCN Permalink
Google Scholar

Online available

EBSCOhost
Eastview
Elibrary
Biblioclub

Archiving

Cyberleninka (24 month OA embargo)

A successful person, society and civic activism

Vol. 16, Iss. 10, OCTOBER 2020

Received: 2 July 2020

Received in revised form: 18 July 2020

Accepted: 5 August 2020

Available online: 15 October 2020

Subject Heading: NATIONAL INTERESTS

JEL Classification: A13, A14, D03

Pages: 1800–1816

https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.16.10.1800

Kozyreva G.B. Institute of Economics of Karelian Research Center of Russian Academy of Sciences (IE KarRC RAS), Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation
kozyrevakrc@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9303-0361

Morozova T.V. Institute of Economics of Karelian Research Center of Russian Academy of Sciences (IE KarRC RAS), Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation
morozova.ras@gmail.com

ORCID id: not available

Belaya R.V. Institute of Economics of Karelian Research Center of Russian Academy of Sciences (IE KarRC RAS), Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation
belaya@krc.karelia.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4100-5038

Subject. The article provides considerations on the formation and development of a successful person model in the modern Russian society.
Objectives. The study is an attempt to model a successful person in the Russian society, when the ideological subsystem of the institutional matrix is changing.
Methods. The study relies upon the theory of institutional matrices by S. Kirdina, theories of human and social capital. We focus on the assumption viewing a person as a carrier of social capital, which conveys a success, socio-economic position, social status, civic activism, doing good to your family and the public, confidence in people and association with your region. The empirical framework comprises data of the sociological survey of the Russian population in 2018. The data were processed through the factor analysis.
Results. We devised a model of a successful person in today's Russian society, which reveals that a success, first of all, depends on the economic wellbeing and has little relation to civic activism. The potential involvement (intention, possibility, preparedness) in the social and political life significantly dominates the real engagement of people. The success has a frail correlation with constituents of the social capital, such as confidence in people and doing good to the public.
Conclusions and Relevance. Based on the socio-economic wellbeing, that is consumption, the existing model of a successful person proves to be ineffective. The sustainability of socio-economic wellbeing seriously contributes to the social disparity of opportunities, which drive a contemporary Russian to a success in life.

Keywords: institutional matrix, social capital, human capital, civic activism, successful person

References:

  1. Baudrillard J. Оbshchestvo potrebleniya: ego-mify i struktury [The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures]. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 2006, 268 p.
  2. Kuz'menko E.O. [Success as a phenomenon of modern mass society and manifestation of the new level of standardization of cultural patterns]. Izvestiya Ural'skogo federal'nogo universiteta. Ser. 1. Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kul'tury = Izvestia Ural Federal University. Series 1. Issues in Education, Science and Culture, 2017, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 178–183. (In Russ.)
  3. Kirdina S.G. Institutsionalnye matritsy i razvitie Rossii: Vvedenie v X–Y-teoriyu [Institutional matrices and the development of Russia: An introduction to the X–Y theory]. St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2014, 468 p.
  4. Rimashevskaya N.M. [Modern Russia: Socioeconomic and demographic problems]. Vestnik RAN = Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2004, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 209–218. (In Russ.)
  5. Zaslavskaya T.I. [Socio-structural aspect of the transformation of the Russian society]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies, 2001, no. 8, pp. 3–11. (In Russ.)
  6. Morozova T.V., Kozyreva G.B. [Modern problems of the quality of life of the population in conditions of adaptation to the market]. Ekonomika Severo-Zapada: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya = Economy of the North-West: Issues and Prospects of Development, 2002, no. 3, pp. 73–82. (In Russ.)
  7. Kozyreva G.B., Morozova T.V., Belaya R.V. [Socio-economic behavior of households of the border region as an indicator of social transformation]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2015, vol. 13, iss. 22, pp. 2–20. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  8. Lopatkin G.V. [Modernization of Russia: Economy and society]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National Interests: Priorities and Security, 2015, vol. 11, iss. 28, pp. 31–39. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  9. Polterovich V.M. [Institutional traps and economic reforms]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody = Economics and Mathematical Methods, 1999, vol. 35, no. 2. (In Russ.)
  10. Polterovich V.M. Elementy teorii reform [Elements of the theory of reform]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2007, 447 p.
  11. Sukharev M.V. [Social anti-institutes]. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya = Economic Sociology, 2004, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 63–73. (In Russ.)
  12. Rusalinova A.A. [Social well-being of a person in the modern world as a scientific problem]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Ser. 6: Filosofiya, politologiya, sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pravo = Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Series. 6: Philosophy, Political Science, Sociology, Psychology, Law, 1994, iss. 1, pp. 49–61. (In Russ.)
  13. Toshchenko Zh.T. [Social sentiment is a phenomenon of the modern sociological theory and practice]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies, 1998, no. 10, pp. 23–36. (In Russ.)
  14. Usmanov B.F. [Crowdsourcing: Innovative technologies for the local initiative]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie = Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 2013, no. 3, pp. 80–85. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  15. Sukharev M.V. [Institutions of e-democracy]. Ekonomika i sotsium, 2016, no. 3, pp. 1223–1230. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  16. Schultz T.W. Investment in Human Capital. The American Economic Review, 1961, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 571–583. URL: Link
  17. Becker G.S. Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis. The Journal of Political Economy, 1962, vol. 70, iss. 5, part 2, pp. 9–49. URL: Link
  18. Kozyreva G.B., Sukharev M.I., Timakov I.V. [Human capital and models of growth]. Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami. Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal, 2017, no. 8. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  19. Sukharev M.V. [Human capital in the general system of knowledge]. Kreativnaya ekonomika = Creative Economy, 2017, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 915–930. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  20. Portes A., Landolt Р. The Downside of Social Capital. The American Prospect, 1996, no. 26, pp. 18–21.
  21. Golenkova Z.T. [Civil society in Russia]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies, 1997, no. 3, pp. 25–36. (In Russ.)
  22. Kharin V.N. Faktornyi analiz (podkhod s ispol'zovaniem EVM) [Factor analysis (the computer-based approach)]. Petrozavodsk, KarRC RAS Publ., 1992, 90 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 16, Iss. 10
October 2020

Archive