+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Corporate integration processes as a mechanism to manage the oil sector of Russia

Vol. 16, Iss. 8, AUGUST 2020

Received: 1 June 2020

Received in revised form: 16 June 2020

Accepted: 30 June 2020

Available online: 14 August 2020

Subject Heading: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY

JEL Classification: L71, Q43, Q48

Pages: 1459–1475

https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.16.8.1459

Rodnyanskii D.V. Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University (KFU), Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation
drodnyansky@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1389-1503

Subject. The oil industry is a key and fundamental source of fiscal revenue in Russia. It includes the mining, refining, transportation and sale of oil and petrochemicals. In this respect, it is important to examine the institutional environment of entities and enterprises operating in the oil sector, and mechanisms and tools for public administration in the sector. The management quality determines not only the performance of some companies, but the national socio-economic development.
Objectives. I substantiate that corporate integration processes influence the management of the oil sector in Russia. I also outline my recommendations on the prediction of the sectoral development by modeling the M&A data.
Methods. To make reasonable and reliable conclusions, I carry out the statistical and retrospective analysis and econometric modeling apparatus.
Results. I analyzed how corporate integration processes influenced the public administration in the oil sector of the Russian Federation. Based on the correlation and regression analysis, I conclude on the extent to which each factor influences the development indicators of the oil sector.
Conclusions and Relevance. In addition to traditional tools of the sectoral regulation, special governmental authorities should use the mechanism of corporate integration processes. Furthermore, governmental institutions should join the process to enhance the management, ensure the balance of short-term and long-term interests of some business structures and the entire sector, and the sustainable development of the national oil sector.

Keywords: integration processes, industry management, oil industry

References:

  1. Sappington D., Stiglitz J. Privatization, Information and Incentives. Journal of Political Analysis and Management, 1987, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 567–582. URL: Link
  2. Stiglitz J. Lyudi, vlast' i pribyl'. Progressivnyi kapitalizm v epokhu massovogo nedovol'stva [People, Power and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent]. Moscow, Al'pina Pablisher Publ., 2020, 432 p.
  3. Shleifer A., Vishny R.W. A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of American Finance Association, 1997, vol. 52, iss. 2, pp. 737–783. URL: Link
  4. Megginson W.L. Privatization, State Capitalism, and State Ownership of Business in the 21st Century. Foundation and Trends in Finance, 2017, vol. 11, iss. 1-2, pp. 1–153. URL: Link
  5. Boubakri N., El Ghoul S., Guedhami O., Megginson W.L. The Market Value of Government Ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2018, vol. 50, pp. 44–65. URL: Link
  6. Megginson W.L., Ullah B., Wei Z. State Ownership, Soft-Budget Constraints, and Cash Holdings: Evidence from China's Privatized Firms. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2014, vol. 48, pp. 276–291. URL: Link
  7. Abramov A., Radygin A., Chernova M., Entov R. [State ownership and performance characteristics. Economy of the public sector]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2017, no. 4, pp. 5–37. (In Russ.)
  8. Abramov A., Aksenov I., Radygin A., Chernova M. [Modern approaches to measuring the public sector: The methodology and empirical base]. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy, 2018, no. 2, pp. 28–47. (In Russ.)
  9. Bolivar M.P.R., Sanchez R.G., Lopez Hernandez A.M. Managers as Drivers of CSR in State-Owned Enterprises. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2015, vol. 58, iss. 5, pp. 777–801. URL: Link
  10. Bruton G.D., Peng M.W., Ahlstrom D. et al. State-Owned Enterprises around the World as Hybrid Organizations. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 2015, vol. 29, iss. 1, pp. 92–114. URL: Link
  11. Clegg L.J., Voss H., Tardios J.A. The Autocratic Advantage: Internationalization of State-Owned Multinationals. Journal of World Business, 2018, vol. 53, iss. 5, pp. 668–681. URL: Link
  12. Clovis A.B. Corruption and Compliance in State-owned Companies: Rationality of Brazilian State-Owned Companies Law. Administrative Law Review, 2018, vol. 277, iss. 1, pp. 241–272.
  13. Clo S., Fiorio C.V., Florio M. The Targets of State Capitalism: Evidence from M&A Deals. European Journal of Political Economy, 2017, vol. 47, pp. 61–74. URL: Link
  14. Cuervo-Cazurra A., Inkpen A., Musacchio A., Ramaswamy K. Governments as Owners: State-owned Multinational Companies. Journal of Business Studies, 2014, vol. 45, pp. 919–942. URL: Link
  15. Ding S., Jia Chunxin, Wu Z., Zhang X. Executive Political Connections and Firm Performance: Comparative Evidence from Privately-controlled and State-owned Enterprises. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2013, vol. 36(C), pp. 153–167. URL: Link
  16. Pirogov A.N. [Mergers and Acquisitions: Foreign and Russian Theory and Practice]. Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom = Management in Russia and Abroad, 2001, no. 5, pp. 11–12. (In Russ.)
  17. Trautwein F. Mergers Motives and Mergers Prescriptions. Strategic Management Journal, 1990, vol. 11, iss. 4, pp. 283–295. URL: Link
  18. Blonigen B.A., Pierce J.R. Evidence for the Effects of Mergers Power and Efficiency. NBER Working Paper, 2016, no. 22750. URL: Link
  19. Levine O. Acquiring Growth. Journal of Financial Economics, 2017, no. 126, pp. 300–319.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive