+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Environmental and economic processes in the European North of Russia: Sustainability Window Analysis

Vol. 16, Iss. 4, APRIL 2020

Received: 17 February 2020

Received in revised form: 7 March 2020

Accepted: 25 March 2020

Available online: 15 April 2020

Subject Heading: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY

JEL Classification: Q56, Q57, R11

Pages: 644–661

https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.16.4.644

Shkiperova G.T. Institute of Economics of Karelian Scientific Center of Russian Academy of Sciences (IE KarRC RAS), Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation
shkiperova@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0500-9912

Druzhinin P.V. Institute of Economics of Karelian Scientific Center of Russian Academy of Sciences (IE KarRC RAS), Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation
pdruzhinin@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5303-0455

Kurilo A.E. Institute of Economics of Karelian Scientific Center of Russian Academy of Sciences (IE KarRC RAS), Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation
akurilo@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7222-7832

Subject. The article discusses issues that arise in evaluating and monitoring the transition to sustainable development, being important aspects researchers and politicians focus on. Successful planning of future growth and decision-making are recognized to require comprehensive actions addressing economic, environmental and social aspects of sustainability. The analysis of the sustainability window seems as one of possible methods to evaluate the quality of economic growth in line with environmental and social prospects.
Objectives. The study evaluates boundaries of the sustainable economic growth of the northern regions of Russia, referring to its environmental footprint and well-being of people.
Methods. We applied methods of statistical and comparative analysis and evaluated boundaries of the sustainable development of regions with the sustainability window analysis.
Results. The sustainability window is proved to exist for all regions of the European North of Russia, except the Republic of Komi. However, GRP grew out of the sustainability limits in certain years. The lower bound of the sustainable economic development slowly decreased until 2013, but reassumed its growth afterwards. After 2013 an expected increase in the public well-being required higher rates of economic growth. Some regions failed to ensure them.
Conclusions and Relevance. The analysis of the sustainability window and the analysis of environmental efficiency gap are critically informative for specialists in charge of planning and decision-makers. The method helps use various sets of indicators and analyze various time series, thus streamlining the elaboration of economic development scenarios, conditions in line with environmental and social sustainability.

Keywords: sustainable development, sustainability window, analysis, economic growth, environmental pollution, European North

References:

  1. Loiseau E. et al. Green Economy and Related Concepts: An Oerview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, vol. 139, pp. 361–371. URL: Link
  2. Harangoz G., Csutora M., Kocsis T. How Big is Big Enough? Toward a Sustainable Future by Examining Alternatives to the Conventional Economic Growth Paradigm. Sustainable Development, 2018, vol. 26, pp. 172–181. URL: Link
  3. Kasztelan A. Green Growth, Green Economy and Sustainable Development: Terminological and Relational Discourse. Prague Economic Papers, 2017, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 487–499. URL: Link
  4. Waas T. et al. Sustainability Assessment and Indicators: Tools in a Decision-Making Strategy for Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 2014, vol. 6, iss. 9, pp. 5512–5534. URL: Link
  5. Schoenaker N., Hoekstra R., Smits P. Comparison of Measurement Systems for Sustainable Development at the National Level. Sustainable Development, 2015, vol. 23, iss. 5, pp. 285–300. URL: Link
  6. Eustachio J., Caldana A.C., Liboni L.B., Martinelli D.P. Systemic Indicator of Sustainable Development: Proposal and Application of a Framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, vol. 241. URL: Link
  7. Megyesiova S., Lieskovska V. Analysis of the Sustainable Development Indicators in the OECD Countries. Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, iss. 12, pp. 4554–4576. URL: Link
  8. Miola A., Schiltz F. Measuring Sustainable Development Goals Performance: How to Monitor Policy Action in the 2030 Agenda Implementation? Ecological Economics, 2019, vol. 164, p. 106373. URL: Link
  9. Cobb J.B. For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment and a Sustainable Future. Beacon Press, 1989, 534 p.
  10. Syrovatka M. On Sustainability Interpretations of the Ecological Footprint. Ecological Economics, 2020, vol. 169, pp. 106543. URL: Link
  11. Lyaskovskaya E.A., Grigorieva K.M. [Ranking of inclusive development of macroregions of the Russian Federation]. Vestnik YuUrGU. Ser. Ekonomika i menedzhment = Bulletin of South Ural State University. Series Economics and Management, 2018, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 45–54. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  12. Müller-Fürstenberger G., Wagner M. Exploring the Environmental Kuznets Hypothesis: Theoretical and Econometric Problems. Ecological Economics, 2007, vol. 62, iss. 3-4, pp. 648–660. URL: Link
  13. Shkiperova G.T. [An environmental Kuznets curve as a tool to study the regional development]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2013, vol. 12, iss. 19, pp. 8–16. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  14. Victor P.A. Ecological Economics and Economic Growth. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2010, vol. 1185, iss. 1, pp. 237–245. URL: Link
  15. Shkiperova G.T. [Effect of Environmental Policy Changes on Pollution: A Comparative Analysis of European Union and Russia]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2019, vol. 18, iss. 7, pp. 1256–1272. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  16. Kaivo-oja J., Juha Panula-Ontto J., Jarmo Vehmas J., Luukkanen J. Relationships of the Dimensions of Sustainability as Measured by the Sustainable Society Index Framework. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2014, vol. 21, iss. 1, pp. 39–44. URL: Link
  17. Luukkanen J., Kaivo-oja J., Vehmas J., Panula-Ontto J., Hayha L. Dynamic Sustainability. Sustainability Window Analysis of Chinese Poverty-Environment Nexus Development. Sustainability, 2015, vol. 7, iss. 11, pp. 14488–14500. URL: Link
  18. Luukkanen J. et al. Green Economic Development in Lao PDR: A Sustainability Window Analysis of Green Growth Productivity and the Efficiency Gap. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, vol. 211, pp. 818–829. URL: Link
  19. Bobylev S.N. Indikatory ustoichivogo razvitiya: ekonomika, obshchestvo, priroda [Sustainable Development Indicators: Economy, Society, Nature]. Moscow, MAKS Press Publ., 2008, 201 p.
  20. Uskova T.V. Upravlenie ustoichivym razvitiem regiona: monografiya [Management of Sustainable Development of the Region: a monograph]. Vologda, ISERT RAN Publ., 2009, 355 p.
  21. Gutman S.S., Basova А.А. [Indicators of Sustainable Development of Russian Federation Arctic Zone: Problems of Selection and Measurement]. Arktika. Ekologiya i ekonomika = Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2017, no. 4, pp. 32–48. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  22. Fauzer V.V., Smirnov A.V., Lytkina T.S., Fauzer G.N. [Sustainable Development in Russia's Northern Regions: Labor Dimension]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz = Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2018, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 120–136. URL: Link
  23. Leksin V.N., Profir'ev B.N. [Socio-Economic Priorities for the Sustainable Development of Russian Arctic Macro-Region]. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region, 2017, vol. 13, iss. 4, pp. 985–1004. (In Russ.) URL: Link

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive