Subject Control and supervision on the part of the State remain one of the most acute aspects where interests of the State and business overlap. On the one hand, governmental control is being reformed and some legislative initiatives of the President and RF Government are being implemented. On the other hand, the business community perceives this as the tightened control and supervision. Objectives The study evaluates the impact of control (oversight) over business operations and analyzes the interaction of business and the State as governmental control practices are being reformed in the Tver Oblast. I also outline my proposals for making the interaction of business and the State more effective so as to create the secure and convenient business environment. Methods I systematize and analyze the outcome of surveys conducted in the Tver Oblast in 2017 and 2018 among three hundred of business leaders. The study is based on methods of scientific analysis, economic and mathematical statistics, feasibility and logic study, graphic, economic and mathematical modeling. Results I revealed key issues arising from the interaction of business and controlling and supervisory authorities. The article sets out measures that may contribute to convenient and secure business conditions. Conclusions and Relevance Business has little interest in organizational aspects of governmental authorities when undergoing controlling and supervisory checks. The business community advocates for measures streamlining such checks, i.e. simple and understandable instructions on control procedures, reduction in statutory reporting, less frequent amendments to the laws.
Keywords: control and supervision, public administration reform, business environment, business climate, economic security
References:
Castaño M.S., Méndez M.T., Galindo M.A. The Effect of Public Policies on Entrepreneurial Activity and Economic Growth. Journal of Business Research, 2016, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 5280–5285. URL: Link
Laplume А.О., Pathak S., Xavier-Oliveira E. The Politics of Intellectual Property Rights Regimes: An Empirical Study of New Technology Use in Entrepreneurship. Technovation, 2014, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 807–816. URL: Link
Ranasinghe A. Property Rights, Extortion and the Misallocation of Talent. European Economic Review, 2017, vol. 98, pp. 86–110. URL: Link
Dickel P., Graeff P. Entrepreneurs' Propensity for Corruption: A Vignette-Based Factorial Survey. Journal of Business Research, 2018, vol. 89, pp. 77–86. URL: Link
Stroe S., Parida V., Wincent J. Effectuation or Causation: An fsQCA Analysis of Entrepreneurial Passion, Risk Perception, and Self-Efficacy. Journal of Business Research, 2018, vol. 89, pp. 265–272. URL: Link
De Soto H. The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World. New York, Harper and Row, 1989, 271 p.
Beynon M.J., Jones P., Pickernell D. Entrepreneurial Climate and Self-Perceptions about Entrepreneurship: A Country Comparison using fsQCA with Dual Outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 2018, vol. 89, pp. 418–428. URL: Link
Stenholm P., Acs Z.J., Wuebker R. Exploring Country-Level Institutional Arrangements on the Rate and Type of Entrepreneurial Activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 2013. vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 176–193. URL: Link
Salman D.M. What is the Role of Public Policies to Robust International Entrepreneurial Activities on Economic Growth? Evidence from Cross Countries Study. Future Business Journal, 2016, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–14. URL: Link
Dai W., Si S. Government Policies and Firms’ Entrepreneurial Orientation: Strategic Choice and Institutional Perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 2018, vol. 93, pp. 23–36. URL: Link
Bondarenko I.V. Izmenenie institutsional'nykh uslovii razvitiya predprinimatel'stva v kontekste reformy kontrol'no-nadzornoi deyatel'nosti. V kn.: Ekonomika Sibiri v usloviyakh global'nykh vyzovov XXI veka [Changes in institutional conditions for business development in the lens of control and supervision reform. In: Economy of Siberia Under global challenges of the 21st century]. Novosibirsk, Institute of Economics and Industrial Production, Siberian branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2018, pp. 31–39. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Nikonova Yu.Sh. [Improvement of the system of principles of State control (supervision) in the context of reform of control and supervisory activities]. Original'nye issledovaniya =Original Studies, 2018, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 26–33. (In Russ.)
Krasyukova N.L. [Analysis of the existing system of legal bases methodology of implementation of risk-based framework in the work of regulatory bodies]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2016, vol. 76, no. 11-3, pp. 140–143. (In Russ.)
Grunina D.K. [Control and supervision activities as a factor of boosting business activity of tax authorities]. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo =Economics, Taxes & Law, 2018, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 131–139. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Ganus A.A. [Reform of control and supervisory activities of State power in Russia and evaluation of its effectiveness]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskoi yuridicheskoi akademii =Bulletin of Saint Petersburg Juridical Academy, 2018, no. 3, pp. 15–19.
Levonenkova T.A. [State and municipal control (supervision): Searching for effective solutions]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava =Journal of Russian Law, 2014, vol. 9, pp. 140–149. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Komov V.E., Kabalinskii A.I. [Justification to improve the effectiveness of control and monitoring activities at the regional level]. Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki =News of Tula State University. Economic and Legal Sciences, 2017, vol. 1-1, pp. 159–164. URL: Link (In Russ.)
