Subject The article deals with factors shaping the innovative potential and organizational and economic relations that arise during the formation and use of the innovative potential. Objectives The research identifies key drivers of the national innovative potential. Methods We continue setting up an instrumental and methodological approach to adapting the triple helix model to Russia. In this research, we investigate whether University, Industry and Government may cooperate on innovation. We determine it by evaluating how each element influences the origination of innovation. Results Statistical data herein are divided into three parts by original space – Knowledge, Consensus and Innovation. The article presents econometric models allowing to find factors influencing the innovative potential of the national economy. Based on the models, we make statistically reasonable conclusions and assessments. Conclusionsand Relevance We identified fundamental factors influencing the number of innovations implemented in Russia for a 15-year period – the level of federal funding, percentage of innovative goods in the total number of goods shipped, specialists with academic degrees. Considering the interaction of the spaces, the Knowledge space acted positively. Summarizing results of quantitative analysis and available facts, we infer that the national economic growth becomes feasible if the State allocates more funding for innovative researches. However, the State should noticeably pay more attention to the national education and science.
Dezhina I.G., Kiseleva V.V. Gosudarstvo, nauka i biznes v innovatsionnoi sisteme Rossii [State, science and business in the innovation system of Russia]. Moscow, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy Publ., 2008, 227 p.
Hamel G., Prahalad K.K. Konkuriruya za budushchee. Sozdanie rynkov zavtrashnego dnya [Competing for the Future]. Moscow, Olimp-Biznes Publ., 2002, 288 p.
Chesbrough H.W. Otkrytye innovatsii. Sozdanie pribyl'nykh tekhnologii [Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology]. Moscow, Pokolenie Publ., 2007, 336 p.
Malinetskii G.G. Proekty i riski budushchego. Kontseptsii, modeli, instrumenty, prognozy [Projects and risks of the future. Concepts, models, tools, forecasts]. Moscow, Krasand Publ., 2011, 432 p.
Mil'ner B.Z., Orlova T.M. Organizatsiya sozdaniya innovatsii: gorizontal'nye svyazi i upravlenie: monografiya [Arranging for innovation: Horizontal nexus and management: a monograph]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2013, 288 p.
Karlik A.E., Titov A.B., Alekseev A.A. et al. Innovatsionnye aspekty razvitiya predpriyatii [Innovative aspects of corporate development]. St. Petersburg, UNECON Publ., 2009.
Smorodinskaya N.V. [Innovation economy: From hierarchies to network order]. Vestnik IE RAN = Bulletin of Institute of Economics of RAS, 2013, no. 2, pp. 87–111. (In Russ.)
Ivanova N.I. Nauchnaya i innovatsionnaya politika. Rossiya i mir. 2011–2012 [Scientific and innovative policy. Russia and the world, 2011–2012]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2013, 480 p.
Auzan A.A. [The track of Russian modernization]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' = Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 2007, no. 6, pp. 54–60. (In Russ.)
Andryushkevich O.A., Denisova I.M. [The formation of entrepreneurial universities in innovative economy]. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii = Economics of Contemporary Russia, 2014, no. 3, pp. 87–104. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Christensen C.M., Raynor M.E. Reshenie problemy innovatsii v biznese. Kak sozdat' rastushchii biznes i uspeshno podderzhivat' ego rost [The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth]. Moscow, Al'pina Pablisher Publ., 2014, 290 p.
Etzkowitz H. Troinaya spiral'. Universitety – Predpriyatija – Gosudarstvo. Innovatsii v deistvii [The Triple Helix: University–Industry–Government Innovation in Action]. Tomsk, TUSUR University Publ., 2010, 238 p.
Pakhomova E.A. Metodologicheskie osnovy otsenki vliyaniya vuza naukograda na effektivnost' regional'nogo razvitiya [Methodological principles for evaluating the impact of the university in a science city on the regional development efficiency]. Saarbürcken, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publ., 2011, 418 p.
Panov S.A., Pakhomova E.A., Pakhomov A.V. [Western and Russian versions of the triple helix model as an integrated approach to analyzing the formation of knowledge-based economy]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National Interests: Priorities and Security, 2015, no. 25, pp. 14–27. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Smorodinskaya N.V. [Triple Helix as a new matrix of economic systems]. Innovatsii = Innovations, 2011, no. 4, pp. 166–178. (In Russ.)
Korobova V.F., Zhigalova Yu.O. [Estimation of innovative potential of region (on the example of the Ivanovo Area)]. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii. Regional'noe prilozhenie = Modern High Technologies. Regional Application, 2017, no. 1, pp. 52–58. (In Russ.)
Bakhtizin A.R., Akinfeeva E.V. [Comparative estimates of innovation potential of the regions of the Russian Federation]. Problemy prognozirovaniya = Problems of Forecasting, 2010, no. 3, pp. 73–81. (In Russ.)
Bendikov M.A., Khrustalev E.Yu. [Methodological principles for studying the innovative development mechanism in the contemporary economy]. Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom = Management in Russia and Abroad, 2007, no. 2, pp. 3–14. (In Russ.)