National Interests: Priorities and Security

Abstracting and Indexing

Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
LCCN Permalink
Google Scholar

Online available



Cyberleninka (24 month OA embargo)

Economic aspects of nuclear power engineering involved to address issues of global climate change

Vol. 14, Iss. 9, SEPTEMBER 2018

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 24 May 2018

Received in revised form: 12 June 2018

Accepted: 3 July 2018

Available online: 14 September 2018


JEL Classification: Q48, Q53, Q54

Pages: 1632–1648

Ivantsova E.D. Siberian Federal University (SibFU), Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation

ORCID id: not available

Tsyro Yu.S. Siberian Federal University (SibFU), Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation

ORCID id: not available

Pyzhev A.I. Siberian Federal University (SibFU), Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation

ORCID id: not available

Importance This article considers the possibility of solving the issue by developing nuclear energy as an alternative source of electricity generation, which is characterized by high environmental efficiency.
Objectives We conduct our own comprehensive study into nuclear energy use to solve the global climate change problem, assess nuclear energy risks through a retrospective analysis of the industry development.
Methods The research involves methods of comparative analysis and an integrated survey of the research area.
Results Nuclear energy has no effect on the carbon balance, which is proved by the results of a comparative analysis of various electricity generation characteristics. Nuclear energy risks were found to be artificially overestimated.
Conclusions and Relevance If thoroughly designed and properly operated by high professionals, nuclear power plants are a safe source of energy, which is capable of ensuring high electricity supply, thus substantially reducing the environmental footprint. Whereas electric power plants almost do not exhaust greenhouse gas, they are able to reshape the global environmental landscape.

Keywords: nuclear power, global climate change, environmental efficiency, low-carbon economy, natural hazard, manmade hazard


  1. Guillet S., Corona C., Stoffel M. et al. Climate Response to the Samalas Volcanic Eruption in 1257 Revealed by Proxy Records. Nature Geoscience, 2017, no. 10, pp. 123–128. URL: Link
  2. Porfiriev B. Climate Change: A Hazard or an Opportunity? Environmental Hazards, 2009, vol. 8, iss. 3, pp. 167–170. URL: Link
  3. Mendelsohn R. The Role of Markets and Governments in Helping Society Adapt to a Changing Climate. Climatic Change, 2006, vol. 78, iss. 1, pp. 203–215. URL: Link
  4. Porfiriev B. Climate Change as a Major Slow-Onset Hazard to Development: An Integrated Approach to Bridge the Policy Gap. Environmental Hazards, 2015, vol. 14, iss. 2, pp. 187–191. URL: Link
  5. Porfir'ev B.N., Katsov V.M., Roginko S.A. Izmeneniya klimata i mezhdunarodnaya bezopasnost' [Climate change and international security]. Moscow, D'ART Publ., 2011, 290 p.
  6. Safonov G.V. [The struggle against global warming: The prospects for renewable energy sources in Russia]. Forsait = Foresight and STI Governance, 2007, no. 3, pp. 12–17. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  7. Roberts J.W. If Nuclear Energy Is the Answer, Why Doesn't Everyone Agree? Physics Education, 2018, vol. 53, no. 2. URL: Link
  8. Downer J. The Aviation Paradox: Why We Can ‘Know’ Jetliners But Not Reactors. Minerva, 2017, vol. 55, iss. 2, p. 229. URL: Link
  9. Grachev V.A. [The relationship between global environmental problems, population health, and development of nuclear power industry]. Ekologiya cheloveka = Human Ecology, 2018, no. 2, pp. 9–15. (In Russ.)
  10. Ivanov V., Tsyb A., Ivanov S., Pokrovsky V. Medical Radiological Consequences of the Chernobyl Catastrophe in Russia: Estimation of Radiation Risks. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2004, 388 p.
  11. Zhiznin S., Timokhov V. [Energy impact on sustainable development]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations, 2017, no. 11, pp. 34–42. (In Russ.)
  12. May M.M. Safety First: The Future of Nuclear Energy Outside the United States. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 2016, vol. 73, iss. 1, pp. 38–43. URL: Link
  13. Aalto P., Nyyssönen H., Kojo M., Pal P. Russian Nuclear Energy Diplomacy in Finland and Hungary. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2017, vol. 58, iss. 4, pp. 386–417. URL: Link
  14. Hejazi R. Nuclear Energy: Sense or Nonsense for Environmental Challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 2017, vol. 6, iss. 2, pp. 693–700. URL: Link
  15. Balogh J.M., Jámbor A. Determinants of CO2 Emission: A Global Evidence. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2017, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 171–177.
  16. Petrenko A.V. [Perspectives of nuclear energy. Replacing hydrocarbons]. Rossiiskoe predprinimatel'stvo = Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2008, no. 12-2, pp. 85–89. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  17. Sarkisov A.A. [The phenomenon of public perception of nuclear hazards]. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SPbPU. Estestvennye i inzhenernye nauki = St. Petersburg Polytechnic University Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2012, no. 3-2, pp. 9–21. (In Russ.)
  18. Tolstikov V.G. [The nuclear catastrophe of 1957 in the Urals]. Magistra Vitae, 1999, no. 1, pp. 86–95. (In Russ.)
  19. Penney W., Schonland B.F.J., Kay J.M. et al. Report on the Accident at Windscale No. 1 Pile on 10 October 1957. Journal or Radiological Protection, 2017, no. 37, pp. 780–796. URL: Link
  20. Aleksakhin R.M., Buldakov L.A., Gubanov V.A. et al. Krupnye radiatsionnye avarii: posledstviya i zashchitnye mery [Major radiation accidents: Consequences and protective measures]. Moscow, IzdAT Publ., 2001, 751 p.
  21. Chernyakhovskaya Yu.V. [Greenhouse gas emissions in the electric power sector and their abatement due to Russian NPP Projects]. MPEI Vestnik, 2017, no. 3, pp. 46–52. (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 16, Iss. 5
May 2020