Slesarenko E.V.Kuzbass State Technical University named after T.F. Gorbatchev (KuzSTU), Kemerovo, Russian Federation firstname.lastname@example.org ORCID id: not available
Importance It is especially vital for Russia to improve the mechanism for adjusting the structure of the national economy. The existing structural disparity may cause the loss of economic, technological, political sovereignty and undermine social welfare. The issue is crucial for Russia as it is a cornerstone for its progressive and safe socio-economic development. Objectives I formulate key principles and priorities of the strategy for structural modernization of the Russian economy through the consistent macroeconomic policy of the State pursuing the reindustrialization and technification of the national economy. Methods The research is based on methods of comparative and statistical analysis. Results The modern national economic system completely fails to drive the progressive and secure socio-economic development. The continuing profound deindustrialization, public differentiation make the government take decisive measures to ensure Russia’s socio-economic development. The structural modernization strategy draws upon such principles as an increasing role of the State as a driver of structural modernization, regulator of the mechanism for converting savings into investment, cross-sectoral floating of capital and promotion of responsible production and consumption. Conclusions and Relevance Structural modernization of the Russian economy becomes feasible if the State acts as a regulator, thus respectively formulating principles and scope of its economic policy. The structural modernization policy is driven by the effective mechanism for intensive economic development through reindustrialization. Utilizing the inner potential and resources, national productive forces shall integrate high technology in their processes.
Keywords: structural modernization, State budgetary funds, national corporation, public-private partnership
Osokina N.V., Slesarenko E.V. [Structural disproportions as a threat to economic security of Russia]. Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava = Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2016, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 124–139. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Gubanov S.S. [Russia's crisis realities and their refraction through the lens of governmental assessments: Analysis of D. Medvedev's article)]. Ekonomist = Economist, 2015, no. 10, pp. 3–51. (In Russ.)
Dzarasov S.S. [The crisis in Russia: Sources and lessons]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2009, no. 5, pp. 69–85. (In Russ.)
Amosov A.A. [Is it possible to postpone a turn to a new industrial development until 2017?]. Ekonomist = Economist, 2015, no. 3, pp. 3–13. (In Russ.)
Kuchukov R.A. [No alternative to the planned neo-industrial model]. Ekonomist = Economist, 2015, no. 4, pp. 18–28. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Ryazanov V.T. [Possibilities and conditions for overcoming the stagnation of the national economy]. Ekonomist = Economist, 2015, no. 6, pp. 3–19. (In Russ.)
Akerman E.N. Transformatsiya gosudarstvennoi ekonomicheskoi politiki v usloviyakh ‘novoi ekonomiki’: monografiya [Transformation of the State economic policy under the new economy: a monograph]. Tomsk, Tomsk State University Publ., 2011, 174 p.
Lozhnikova A.V. [Are there any frameworks for the reduction of State participation in economy? Microeconomic approach and trade unions versus macroeconomic stability]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. Ekonomika =Tomsk State University Journal of Economics, 2016, no. 3, pp. 252–265. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Supyan V.B. [The contemporary socio-economic model in the USA]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy = International Trends, 2005, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 28–39. (In Russ.)
Golichenko O.G. [Models of development based on technology diffusion]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2012, no. 4, pp. 117–132. (In Russ.)
Polterovich V.M. [Strategies of modernization, institutions and coalitions]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2008, no. 4, pp. 4–24. (In Russ.)
Didenko D.V. [Innovative and catching-up development: Two strategies for modernizing the Russian knowledge-intensive economy]. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy, 2011, no. 1, pp. 158–169. (In Russ.)
Mogilat A.N. [FDI inflows into Russian real sector: Microeconomic foundations and forecasting]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2015, no. 6, pp. 25–44. (In Russ.)
Gurvich E.T. [Natural rent in the Russian oil and gas sector]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2010, no. 11, pp. 4–24. (In Russ.)
Gurvich E.T., Sokolov I.A. [Fiscal rules: Excessive limitation or indispensable instrument of fiscal sustainability]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2016, no. 4, pp. 5–29. (In Russ.)
Shabanova M.A. [Ethical consumption in Russia: Profiles, factors, and perspectives]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2015, no. 5, pp. 79–103. (In Russ.)
Orlenko L.P. [Necessary conditions for new industrialization and import substitution]. Ekonomist = Economist, 2015, no. 4, pp. 29–35. (In Russ.)
Mnogourovnevyi analiz formirovaniya innovatsionnoi ekonomiki: mir-sistema, region, predpriyatie: monografiya [Multilevel analysis of the originating innovative economy: The world–system, region, enterprise: a monograph]. Kemerovo, Kuzbassvuzizdat Publ., 2014, 331 p.
Varnavskii V.G. [A new concept of public-private partnership in the UK]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations, 2014, no. 8, pp. 67–75. (In Russ.)
Tolkachev S.A. [Two models of new industrialization: Germany – Industry 4.0, USA – Industrial Internet]. Ekonomist = Economist, 2015, no. 9, pp. 13–23. (In Russ.)