+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Changes in the level of the U.S. economic security as part of economic confrontation of the Trans-Pacific Partnership member countries

Vol. 13, Iss. 7, JULY 2017

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 2 February 2017

Received in revised form: 13 March 2017

Accepted: 18 April 2017

Available online: 27 July 2017

Subject Heading: THREATS AND SECURITY

JEL Classification: N45, O19

Pages: 1363–1377

https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.13.7.1363

Gordienko D.V. Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russian Federation
gordienko@ane.ru

Importance The article reviews how the U.S. economic security may change if the USA joins the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
Objectives The research constitutes a comparative evaluation of the U.S. economic security and the member countries of the Trans-Pacific Partnership organized as part of the economic confrontation of the countries.
Methods The research reviews the U.S. economic security indicators, such as unrealized export of commodities from the USA to the TPP countries, China, Russia, India and the EU, and unrealized import from these countries to the U.S. Based on statistical and econometric methods, I evaluate how the U.S. economic security may change due to the economic confrontation.
Results I propose my approach to a comparative evaluation of the change in the economic security of the USA and the TPP member countries as part of the economic confrontation. The proposed approach helps to identify priorities of the economic policies in implementing global integration projects under current circumstances.
Conclusions and Relevance The U.S. economic security may be expressed as multiplicands describing the U.S. economic security as part of the economic confrontation. I conclude that the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership. I conclude that the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement should shape new rules and standards of global trade, considering new trends in global development and ensuring a growth in the economic security of the TPP countries.

Keywords: Trans-Pacific Partnership, Asia Pacific, global crisis, financial crisis, economic security

References:

  1. Gordienko D.V., Kamaev R.A. Obespechenie ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti gosudarstva v usloviyakh globalizazii: monografiya [Ensuring economic security during globalization: a monograph]. Moscow, Argamak-Media Publ., 2016, 360 p.
  2. Senchagov V.K. Ekonomika, finansy, tseny: evolyutsiya, transformatsiya, bezopasnost' [Economics, finance, prices: Evolution, transformation, security]. Moscow, Ankil Publ., 2010, 1120 p.
  3. Gudev P.A. [Asia Pacific: Maritime Conflicts' Political and Legal Background]. Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka = The Far Eastern Affairs, 2016, no. 6, pp. 55–67. (In Russ.)
  4. Chan Khanh. Novye aspekty v amerikanskoi voennoi strategii v Vostoschnoi Azii v XXI veke. V kn.: Novye vyzovy i mekhanizmy bezopasnosti v Vostoschnoi Azii [New aspects of the U.S. military strategy in East Asia in the 21st century. In: New challenges and security mechanisms in East Asia]. Moscow, Forum Publ., 2016, pp. 229–241.
  5. Ageev A.I., Loginov E.L. [Creating Trans-Pacific Partnership: American version of CMEA as a tool for balancing global financial disproportion]. Ekonomicheskie strategii = Economic Strategies, 2015, no. 8, pp. 6–25. (In Russ.)
  6. Perskaya V.V. [Trans-Pacific Partnership: A challenge for the world economy or the integration evolution during transition to multipolarity?]. Ekonomicheskie strategii = Economic Strategies, 2015, no. 8, pp. 26–39. (In Russ.)
  7. Tselishchev I.S. [The Japanese economy is going through not the best times]. Ekonomicheskie strategii = Economic Strategies, 2015, no. 8, pp. 41–48. (In Russ.)
  8. Gordienko D.V. [Assessment of changes in the level of economic security of States – members Trans-Pacific Partnership]. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, reshenya = Economics and Management: Problems, Solutions, 2016, vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 14–33; 2016, vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 33–50; 2016, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 23–30. (In Russ.)
  9. Ezhegodnik SIPRI 2014. Vooruzheniya, razoruzhenie i mezhdunarodnaya bezopasnost' [SIPRI Yearbook 2014. Armaments, Disarmament and International Security]. Moscow, IMEMO Publ., 2015, 764 p.
  10. Knobel' A.Yu., Baeva M.A., Firanchuk A.S. Uchastie Rossii v torgovykh sporakh v ramkakh VTO: analiz konkurentosposobnosti [Russia's participation in trade disputes under the WTO: An analysis of competitiveness]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2016, 140 p.
  11. Drobyshevskii S.M., Sinel'nikova E.V., Sorokina A.V. et al. Mezhdunarodnyi opyt antikrizisnoi politiki [International experience of the anti-crisis policy]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2010, 224 p.
  12. Zavadnikov V. [On constructive government policy in the period of crisis]. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy, 2009, no. 2, pp. 5–11. (In Russ.)
  13. Kudrin A. [The leading countries in the global economy]. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy, 2011, no. 5, pp. 5–8. (In Russ.)
  14. Nabiullina E. [Economic policy during the period of crisis: Analysis and prospects]. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy, 2009, no. 3, pp. 73–85. (In Russ.)
  15. Illarionov A. [Criteria of economic security]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 1998, no. 10, pp. 35–57. (In Russ.)
  16. Terskikh M.A. [Vietnam approach to the development of relations with the U.S.]. Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka = The Far Eastern Affairs, 2016, no. 2, pp. 39–41. (In Russ.)
  17. Ekonomika SShA v XXI veke: problema effektivnosti: kollektivnaya monografiya [The U.S. economy in the 21st century: The issue of efficiency: a collective monograph]. Moscow, IMEMO RAS Publ., 2006.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive