+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Issues and prospects of State regulation of the anthropogenic footprint on the environmental system of the megalopolis: Negative footprint toll

Vol. 13, Iss. 6, JUNE 2017

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 23 March 2017

Received in revised form: 18 April 2017

Accepted: 11 May 2017

Available online: 29 June 2017

Subject Heading: ECOLOGY OF LIVING SYSTEMS

JEL Classification: Q52, Q56, Q57

Pages: 1140-1149

https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.13.6.1140

Pronichkin S.V. Federal Research Center Computer Science and Control of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
pronichkin@mail.ru

Importance Currently, industrial enterprises in megalopolises are one of the main sources of environmental pollution. Statistical data on the environmental situation prove the need to urgently neutralize the impact of enterprises on environmental systems.
Objectives The research examines effective economic mechanisms to influence natural resource consumers so to ensure sustainability of natural environmental systems, natural and anthropogenic sites in megalopolises.
Methods The research draws upon the principles of a systems approach and general scientific methods, such as classification and structural analysis, combination of logic and functional methods, identification of the cause-and-effect relations. The historical method and method of legal comparison were used as special scientific tools.
Results The article demonstrates the underdevelopment of the environmental control system and instrumental control exerted by governmental and nongovernmental institutions, with only few pollutants being envisaged and basic tariffs being set. I suggest setting up the toll rates on some types of physical impact, such as noise and electromagnetic radiation, and on hazardous and contaminating emissions.
Conclusions and Relevance The article provides the rationale for switching from the practice of the toll-based permission of the negative effect towards a voluntary certification system on the basis of the best-in-class technologies. The findings can prove useful in the regulatory activities of executive authorities for environmental issues.

Keywords: anthropogenic burden, megalopolis, environmental certification, environment

References:

  1. Bentham J. The Scenario Approach to Possible Futures for Oil and Natural Gas. Energy Policy, 2014, vol. 64, pp. 87–92. URL: Link
  2. Baklanov А., Molina L., Gauss M. Megacities, Air Quality and Climate. Atmospheric Environment, 2016, vol. 126, pp. 235–249. URL: Link
  3. Wei Y., Huang C., Li J. An Evaluation Model for Urban Carrying Capacity: A Case Study of China's Mega‑cities. Habitat International, 2016, vol. 53, pp. 87–96. URL: Link
  4. Wesseh P., Lin B. Modeling Environmental Policy with and without Abatement Substitution: A Tradeoff between Economics and Environment? Applied Energy, 2016, vol. 167, pp. 34–43. URL: Link
  5. Gendron C. Beyond Environmental and Ecological Economics: Proposal for an Economic Sociology of the Environment. Ecological Economics, 2014, vol. 105, pp. 240–253. URL: Link
  6. Zinovkin N.S. [Polluter pays principle: history, interpretation, implementation into national law]. Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal = Eurasian Law Journal, 2015, no. 3, pp. 147–151. (In Russ.)
  7. Fadeeva A.V. Osobennosti ekologo-ekonomicheskikh otnoshenii v sovremennoi rossiiskoi ekonomike [Specifics of the environmental and economic relations in the contemporary Russian economy]. Tambov, Derzhavin Tambov State University Publ., 2007, 25 p.
  8. Dett B. Europe and the Environmental Law. Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, 2004, 431 p.
  9. Lyashchuk Yu.O., Novak A.I. [Estimate the cost of implementation of measures for environmental protection and reducing environmental risk]. European Social Science Journal, 2014, no. 7-2, pp. 489–493. (In Russ.)
  10. Wagner E. Die neue öffentlich-rechtliche und zivilrechtliche Hersteller und Verwender Haftung bei gefährlichen Stoffen und Produkten. RdU, 2011, vol. 6, pp. 205–210.
  11. Epiney A. Umweltrecht der Europäischen Union. Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlag, 2013, 616 p.
  12. Testa F., Rizzi F., Daddi T. et al. EMAS and ISO 14001: The Differences in Effectively Improving Environmental Performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, vol. 68, pp. 165–173. URL: Link
  13. Luo Q., Catney P., Lerner D. Risk-Based Management of Contaminated Land in the UK: Lessons for China? Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, vol. 90, pp. 1123–1134. URL: Link
  14. Vinarik V.A. [Effects of ISO 9000 certification: an empirical analysis of the Russian industrial enterprises]. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal, 2014, no. 2, pp. 13–36. (In Russ.)
  15. Ivanov A.V. [Self-regulation of construction activities: development, issues, solutions]. Yurist = Lawyer, 2013, no. 11, pp. 18–22. (In Russ.)
  16. Leskova Yu.G. [Membership in a self-regulatory organization: advantages and disadvantages of the current legislation of the Russian Federation]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika = Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice, 2011, no. 3, pp. 66–73. (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive