+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Discussion on confrontation and cooperation in the contemporary politics: From hybrid wars towards the hybrid world

Vol. 13, Iss. 5, MAY 2017

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 16 January 2017

Received in revised form: 27 February 2017

Accepted: 10 April 2017

Available online: 29 May 2017

Subject Heading: CHALLENGES OF GLOBALIZATION AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS

JEL Classification: Z18

Pages: 975-986

https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.13.5.975

Kovalev A.A. North-West Institute of Management of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
senator23@yandex.ru

Importance The article examines the role of the hybrid war phenomenon in the existing geopolitical antagonism of States. I review the specifics of globalization and its role in undermining the stability of the global security system.
Objectives The research overviews and analyzes factors and aspects that engendered the phenomenon of hybrid wars in geopolitical relations. The analysis pursues providing the rationale for the hybrid world concept, which would rearrange and modernize the existing system of global security.
Methods The research draws upon proceedings of national and foreign scholars who study the problem of contemporary wars and the phenomenon of hybrid war. I applied methods of scientific, comparative and matching analysis, general methods of theoretical, empirical research and expert assessment.
Results The article illustrates the gist of hybrid war and proves that the phenomenon of hybrid war originated from the structural and institutional crisis of the global geopolitical system and global security system.
Conclusions and Relevance I justify my conclusion that it is necessary to formulate the concept of hybrid war as a political response to escalating challenges and threats in the global security system and international relations. The findings can be used to articulate the methodology and strategy for setting up the national security system.

Keywords: hybrid wars, hybrid world, geopolitical antagonism, information war, color revolution

References:

  1. Mack A. Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict. World Politics, 1974, vol. 27, iss. 2, pp. 175–200. doi: Link
  2. Magda E.V. Gibridnaya voina: vyzhit' i pobedit' [Hybrid war: Survive and win]. Kharkov, Vivat Publ., 2015, 320 p.
  3. Baudriallard J. Dukh terrorizma. Voiny v Zalive ne bylo [La guerre du Golfe n'a pas eu lieu. Le'spirit du terrorisme. Power Inferno]. Moscow, RIPOL Klassik Publ., 2016, 224 p.
  4. ‘Gibridnye voiny' v khaotiziruyushchemsya mire XXI veka: kollektivnaya monografiya [Hybrid wars in the chaotizing world of the 21st century: a collective monograph]. Moscow, Moscow State University Publ., 2015, 381 p.
  5. Hardt M., Negri A. Mnozhestvo: Voina i demokratiya v epokhu imperii [Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire]. Moscow, Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya Publ., 2006, p. 43.
  6. Schmitt C. Teoriya partizana [Theorie des Partisanen. Zwischenbemerkung zum Begriff des Politischen]. Moscow, Praksis Publ., 2007, 301 p.
  7. Radikov I.V. [The escalation of military-political tensions in the global weakness of international institutions and degeneration of the war]. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal'noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski SKAGS = Public and Municipal Administration. Scientific Notes, 2015, no. 3, p. 35. (In Russ.)
  8. Fursov A.I. Kholodnyi vostochnyi veter russkoi vesny [Eastward cold wind of the Russian spring]. Moscow, Knizhnyi mir Publ., 2015, p. 230.
  9. Gorbachev Yu.E. [Network-centric warfare: myth or reality?]. Voennaya mysl' = Military Thought, 2006, no. 1, pp. 66–76. (In Russ.)
  10. Belozerov V.K., Solov'ev A.V. [Hybrid war in the domestic political and scientific discourse]. Vlast' = The Authority, 2015, no. 9, pp. 8–11. (In Russ.)
  11. Gapich A.E., Lushnikov D.A. Tekhnologii tsvetnykh revolyutsii [Technology of color revolutions]. Moscow, RIOR, INFRA-M Publ., 2014, p. 56.
  12. Huntington S. Tret'ya volna. Demokratizatsiya v kontse XX v [The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century]. Moscow, Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya Publ., 2003, p. 156.
  13. Sidorov P.I. [Mental ecology of the civil war of terror]. Ekologiya cheloveka = Human Ecology, 2014, no. 7, pp. 15–23. (In Russ.)
  14. Osipov Yu.M. [Eurasian (Post-Soviet) international integration as an essential relevance]. Filosofiya khozyaistva = Philosophy of Economy, 2014, no. 1, pp. 17–22. (In Russ.)
  15. Baranovskii V.G., Ivanova N.I. Global'noe upravlenie: vozmozhnosti i riski [Global governance: Possibilities and risks]. Moscow, IMEMO RAN Publ., 2015, 315 p.
  16. Dynkin A.A., Ivanova N.I. Global'naya perestroika [Global Perestroika]. Moscow, Ves' mir Publ., 2014, 528 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive