+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Improving the efficiency of economic development in the constituent entity of the Russian Federation

Vol. 13, Iss. 5, MAY 2017

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 30 January 2017

Received in revised form: 22 February 2017

Accepted: 24 March 2017

Available online: 29 May 2017

Subject Heading: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY

JEL Classification: C52, O18, R11

Pages: 814-826

https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.13.5.814

Smirnov V.V. Ulianov Chuvash State University, Cheboksary, Chuvash Republic, Russian Federation
walera712006@mail.ru

Importance The research examines the efficiency of economic development in the constituent entity of the Russian Federation. The article focuses on how to increase the efficiency of the economy in the constituent entity of the Russian Federation at the macroeconomic level.
Objectives The research formulates the methodological approach to increasing the efficiency of the economic development in the constituent entity of the Russian Federation in the form of macrosystems.
Methods The methodological underpinning includes fundamental tenets of the theory and methodology of a systems analysis, theory of economic systems management, scientific researches in the national and regional economy.
Results The research forges a methodological approach to monitor the efficiency of economic development in constituent entities of the Russian Federation as if they be macrosystems. Applying the method and its tiered segmentation will help to set priorities and provide recommendations for reasonable hierarchical structuring of the economy not only in a certain constituent entity, but also in the Russian Federation as a whole.
Conclusions and Relevance High efficiency of economic development can be achieved only if the difference between paid services per capita and average monetary income per capita is not big, with their absolute value being as high as possible. The findings could be used to formulate and improve the Strategy for socio-economic development and national security of the Russian Federation so to minimize the asymmetric development of the constituent entities.

Keywords: acceptor, donor, donor-acceptor bonding, spatial entropy

References:

  1. Petty W. Ekonomicheskie i statisticheskie raboty. T. I i II [Economic and statistical work. Vol. 1 and 2]. Moscow, Sotsekgiz Publ., 1940, p. 88, p. 172.
  2. Quesnay F., Turgot A.R.J., DuPont de Nemours P.S. Fiziokraty. Izbrannye ekonomicheskie proizvedeniya [The Physiocrats. Selected economic oeuvre]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2008, p. 98.
  3. Ricardo D. Stat'i i rechi o denezhnom obrashchenii i bankakh. Sochineniya. T. 2 [Russian edition. Articles and speeches on monetary circulation and banks. Oeuvre. Volume 2]. Moscow, Gospolitizdat Publ., 1955, 378 p.
  4. Emerson G. Dvenadtsat' printsipov proizvoditel'nosti [The Twelve Principles of Efficiency]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 1972, 223 p.
  5. Kleiner G.B. [Institutional aspects of reforming industrial enterprises]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya = Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Management, 2002, no. 4, pp. 24–30. (In Russ.)
  6. Hyman D.N. Sovremennaya mikroekonomika: analiz i primenenie. T. 1 [Modern Microeconomics: Analysis and Application. Volume 1]. Moscow, Finansy i Statistika Publ., 1992, p. 89.
  7. Hall R.H. Organizatsii: struktury, protsessy, rezul'taty [Organizations: Structures, Processes, Results]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2001, 512 p.
  8. Yuchtman E., Seashore S. A System Resource Approach to Organizational Effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 1967, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 891–903.
  9. Seashore S., Yuchtman E. Factorial Analysis of Organizational Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1967, vol. 12, iss. 3, pp. 377–395.
  10. Kochan T., Larry С., Huber G. Operationalizing the Concepts of Goals and Goal Incompatibility in Organizational Behavior Research. Human Relations, 1976, vol. 29, iss. 6, pp. 527–544.
  11. Perrow Ch. The Analysis of Goals in Complex Organizations. American Sociological Review, 1961, vol. 26, no. 6, p. 855.
  12. Pennings J., Goodman P. Toward a Workable Framework. In: New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness. Proquest Info & Learning, 1977, pp. 160–161.
  13. Vlasyuk L.I., Demina O.V. [Productive regions: Criteria and classification]. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2012, no. 1, pp. 30–32. (In Russ.)
  14. Boesсh F., Harary F., Kabell J. Graphs as Models of Communication Network Vulnerability: Connectivity and Persistence. Networks, 1981, vol. 11, iss. 1, p. 57. doi: Link
  15. Child J., Mcgrath R. Organizations Unfettered: Organizational Form in an Information-Intensive Economy. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, vol. 44, iss. 6, pp. 1136–1137. doi: Link
  16. Bozovic G. Siva ekonomija i sisnem. Industrija, Beograd, 1995, no. 4, p. 59.
  17. Shekhovtseva L.S. [Strategic goal-setting for the region’s development: a conceptual framework]. Ekonomicheskie nauki = Economic Sciences, 2007, no. 2, p. 72. (In Russ.)
  18. Frey R. Europaische Integration, Regionalstruktur und Foderaliemus. Aussenwirtschaft, 1995, Jg. 30, H. II, p. 295.
  19. Baden-Fuller Ch. Special Issue on Strategizing and Organizing. Long Range Planning, 2006, vol. 39, iss. 6, p. 577. doi: Link
  20. Lefevr V.A. Konfliktuyushchie struktury [Conflicting structures]. Moscow, Sovetskoe radio Publ., 1973, p. 60.
  21. Lenin V.I. Fevral' – iyun' 1907. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v 55 t. T. 15 [February through June 1907. Complete collection of works, 55 volumes. Volume 15]. Moscow, Politicheskaya literatura Publ., 1972, p. 386.
  22. Granberg A.G. [The strategy of territorial social and economic development of Russia: From idea to implementation]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2001, no. 9, p. 15. (In Russ.)
  23. Hegel G.F. Sochineniya. T. 5. Nauka logiki [Works. Vol. 5. The Science of Logic]. Moscow, Leningrad, Sotsekgiz Publ., 1937, p. 18.
  24. Peters T., Waterman R. V poiskakh effektivnogo upravleniya (opyt luchshikh kompanii) [In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1986, p. 11.
  25. Keynes J. Obshchaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta i deneg [The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money]. Moscow, Gelios ARV Publ., 1999, p. 46.
  26. Kleiner G.B. [What mesoeconomy does Russia need? Regional economy in the light of the systemic theory]. Vestnik finansovogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Financial University, 2014, no. 4, p. 8. (In Russ.)
  27. Makarov V., Kleiner G. [Economic development of Russia and issues of the microeconomy of knowledge]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya = Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Management, 2008, no. 2, pp. 15–16. (In Russ.)
  28. Naisbitt J. Global Paradox: The Bigger the World Economy, the More Powerful Its Smallest Players. William Morrow & Co, 1994, pp. 43–44.
  29. Borrmann A., Koopmann G. Regionalisation and Regionalism in World Trade. Intereconomics, 1994, vol. 29, iss. 4, pp. 165–166. doi: 10.1007/BF02926434" target="_blank">Link

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 3
March 2024

Archive