+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

The region’s investment climate as a driver of economic security: Evidence from the Republic of Crimea

Vol. 12, Iss. 12, DECEMBER 2016

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 21 July 2016

Received in revised form: 5 September 2016

Accepted: 5 October 2016

Available online: 23 December 2016

Subject Heading: ECONOMIC SECURITY

JEL Classification: E22, O16, R11

Pages: 111-118

Nikitina M.G. V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol, Republic of Crimea, Russian Federation
inecondep@mail.ru

Druzin R.V. V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol, Republic of Crimea, Russian Federation
druzinrv@gmail.com

Importance The investment climate is an indispensable driver of the national security. The research confirms the hypothesis of deteriorating investment climate in the Republic of Crimea. If the free economic zone is established in the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol, it will improve the investment climate and encourage investment in the region. The research verifies this statement.
Objectives The research examines how the investment climate is created in Crimea and identifies factors that hinder this process, considering the need to ensure the national security.
Methods The research relies upon general scientific and special methods, including analysis and synthesis, observation, induction and deduction, systems approach, graphical method, correlation and regression analysis.
Results The Republic of Crimea tried to establish free economic zones before, thus facilitating this process in 2015. Investment is of domestic nature, with sectoral disparity in its allocation being seen. Currently, socio-economic development is different throughout areas and sectors, with factors inhibiting economic security still remaining. This proves the need to undertake activities to preserve the stability of the economic development model.
Conclusions and Relevance We conclude that the investment raised will not always meet its substance in the full sense of this term, thus giving grounds to speak about legitimization of fixed assets that were constructed earlier in the form of investment. The investment climate of the Republic of Crimea is influenced with some inhibiting factors, which impede the influx of investment. To improve the situation, it would be reasonable to undertake dedicated measures.

Keywords: free economic zone, investment climate, sanctions

References:

  1. Ansoff H.I. Corporate Strategy. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1965, 241 p.
  2. Buckley P.J., Casson M.C. Analyzing Foreign Market Entry Strategies: Extending the Internalization Approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 1998, vol. 29, iss. 3, pp. 539–561.
  3. Buckley P.J., Cross A.R., Tan H. et al. Historic and Emergent Trends in Chinese Outward Direct Investment. Management International Review, 2008, vol. 48, iss. 6, pp. 715–748.
  4. Willamson O.I. Ekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma: firmy, rynki, otnoshencheskaya, kontraktatsiya [The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting]. St. Petersburg, Lenizdat Publ., 1996, 702 p.
  5. Featherman D., Hauser R.M. A Refined Model of Occupational Mobility. In: Social Stratification: Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective. Boulder, Westview Press, 2008, pp. 426–436.
  6. Alpatova E.S. [Free economic zones: theoretical aspects of the research]. Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava = Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2008, no. 3, pp. 4–13. (In Russ.)
  7. Babanov A.V. [Classification of factors shaping the investment attractiveness of the region]. Ekonomicheskii zhurnal = Economic Journal, 2012, no. 28, pp. 88–95. (In Russ.)
  8. Gladkaya S.V. [Mechanisms to enhance the investment attractiveness of the region]. TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2013, no. 4-3, pp. 226–230. (In Russ.)
  9. Dan'ko T.P., Kutsenko E.S. [Basic approaches to identifying clusters in the region’s economy]. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki = Problems of Modern Economics, 2012, no. 1, pp. 248–254. (In Russ.)
  10. Zimenkov R.I. [The U.S. experience in establishing and running free economic zones]. Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik = Russian Foreign Economic Bulletin, 2005, no. 11, pp. 12–23. (In Russ.)
  11. Kalinina A.E., Zadorozhneva Yu.V. [Prospects for implementing the innovative scenario of the Volgograd Oblast development: issues, evaluation]. Vestnik VolGU. Ser. Ekonomika. Ekologiya = Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Global Economic System, 2012, no. 2, pp. 23–31. (In Russ.)
  12. Myakshin V.N. [Methodological approaches to identifying priority areas for investment in the region’s economy]. Vestnik YuUrGU. Ser. Ekonomika i menedzhment = Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series Economics and Management, 2013, no. 2, pp. 18–28. (In Russ.)
  13. Naryshkin S.E. [Investment security as a factor of steady economic development]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2010, no. 5, pp. 16–25. (In Russ.)
  14. Nikitina M.G. Fenomen svobodnykh ekonomicheskikh zon v sovremennom mire: monografiya [The phenomenon of free economic zones in the modern world: a monograph]. Simferopol, Frunze Simferopol State University Publ., 1998, 188 p.
  15. Rybakov S.A. Osobye ekonomicheskie zony v Rossi. Nalogovye l'goty i preimushchestva [Special economic zones in Russia. Tax credits and preferences]. Moscow, Grant Publ., 2006, p. 48.
  16. Turlai I.S. Vliyanie regional'noi ekonomicheskoi integratsii na privlechenie pryamykh inostrannykh investitsii: monografiya [An influence of regional economic integration on the attraction of foreign direct investment: a monograph]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2012, 146 p.
  17. Gribkov A.B. [Investment attractiveness of regions in the Southern Federal District]. Uchenye zapiski RGSU = RSSU Proceedings, 2006, no. 3, pp. 45–50. (In Russ.)
  18. Batyrova M.K. [Institutional transformation of the investment market as a driver of investment attractiveness of the region’s agriculture]. Agrarnyi vestnik Urala = Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals, 2008, no. 10, pp. 28–30. (In Russ.)
  19. Yakovleva L.R. [Investment attractiveness of the region's productive potential]. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba = Public Administration, 2008, no. 4, pp. 157–161. (In Russ.)
  20. Bei E.I. [Investment attractiveness of regions is a mechanism for increasing the competitiveness of the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Universiteta. Ser. Natsional'naya i mirovaya ekonomika = Scientific Journal of University. Series National and Global Economy, 2008, no. 1, pp. 165–169. (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive