National Interests: Priorities and Security

Abstracting and Indexing

Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
LCCN Permalink
Google Scholar

Online available



Cyberleninka (24 month OA embargo)

The concept of servant leadership for implicit knowledge management: Analysis and synthesis

Vol. 12, Iss. 10, OCTOBER 2016

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 20 June 2016

Received in revised form: 30 July 2016

Accepted: 22 August 2016

Available online: 1 November 2016

Subject Heading: SCHOLAR DISPUTE

JEL Classification: M14, O35, O47, Z18

Pages: 185-204

Gumerova G.I. Fund for Infrastructure and Educational Programs, RUSNANO, Moscow, Russian Federation

Shaimieva E.Sh. Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation

Importance The article analyzes the servant leadership as the concept of economy-of-knowledge leadership that relies upon principles of ethics. The analysis brinks on the edge of philosophy, areas of economics in terms of effectiveness of the corporate concept of organizational behavior, labor productivity. We synthesized the concept on the basis of the illicit knowledge management model by considering five hypotheses from theoretical, institutional, economic perspectives of the concept.
Objectives The research pursues analyzing the servant leadership concept, synthesizing the concept for purposes of the illicit knowledge model and outlining recommendations on how to formulate the concept of leadership in the organizational knowledge management model under the Russian environment.
Methods The research involves general scientific methods of theoretical, empirical cognition.
Results We supplemented the concept of managerial functions of the manager within the economy of knowledge with the higher function of mindset. The article classifies leadership theories that have emerged since 1967, and generates a value-based approach. We analyzed the servant leadership function in philosophy, economics, corporate performance, formulated requirements to the leadership model in terms of the organization knowledge management model from theoretical, institutional, economic perspectives.
Conclusions and Relevance The concept is concluded to be inapplicable in the Russian conditions to influence the effectiveness of organizational behavior since corporate governance practices and its specifics significantly differ in Russia and the USA. We tried to substantiate the implementation of management concepts, including leadership and organizational behavior, in the first- and second-class clusters that are typical of Russia. The findings are useful to articulate national theories of leadership, knowledge management model, practices of managerial competence advancement in the economy of knowledge, refining tools to extract illicit corporate knowledge during a hybrid combination of real and virtual space of management.

Keywords: leadership theories, knowledge economy, irrational knowledge, implicit knowledge, organizational behavior


  1. Pankratova O.A. Sootnoshenie ratsional'nogo i neratsional'nogo v protsedure ponimaniya nauchnogo poznaniya. V kn.: Istoriya filosofii i teoriya poznaniya: grani vzaimodeistviya. Vyp. 5 [Trade-off of the rational and irrational aspects in understanding of the scientific cognition. In: The history of philosophy and theory of cognition: aspects of their interaction. Issue 5]. Ulyanovsk, Ulyanovsk State University Publ., 2011, pp. 156–160.
  2. Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. Kompaniya – sozdatel' znaniya. Zarozhdenie i razvitie innovatsii v yaponskikh firmakh [The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation]. Moscow, Olimp-Biznes Publ., 2011, 384 p.
  3. Gumerova G.I., Shaimieva E.Sh. [Managing hi-tech businesses in line with the markets of illicit and explicit knowledge]. Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava = Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2015, no. 1, p. 156–171. (In Russ.)
  4. Sundukov A.B. [Leadership as a managerial technique of corporate development in the information-driven economy]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Ser. Gumanitarnye nauki = Bulletin of Tambov University. Series Humanities, 2014, no. 11, pp. 185–189. (In Russ.)
  5. Filonovich S.R. [Searching for the Russian model of management: insiders' views]. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal, 2004, no. 3, pp. 3–16. (In Russ.)
  6. Filonovich S.R. [Leadership theories in management: history and prospects]. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Journal of Management, 2003, no. 2, pp. 3–24. (In Russ.)
  7. Burton-Jones A. Knowledge Capitalism: Business Work and Learning in the New Economy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999, 264 p.
  8. Santora J.C., Sendjaya S., Sarros J.C. Defining and Measuring Servant Leadership Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 2008, vol. 45, iss. 2, pp. 402–420.
  9. Van Dierendonck D. Servant Leadership: A Review and Synthesis. Journal of Management, 2011, vol. 37, no. 4, p. 1228.
  10. Pircher V., Peus C. Servant Leadership. In: Trends der psychologischen Führungsforschung. Neue Konzepte, Methoden und Erfahrungen. Göttingen, Hogrefe Verlag, 2014, pp. 66–77.
  11. Pircher V., Peus A. Servant Leadership aus wissenschaftlicher Sicht: Erfahrungen mit dem Servant Leadership Servey. In: Servant Leadership. Prinzipien dienender Führung in Unternehmen. Göttingen, Erich Scnmidt Verlag, 2014, pp. 93–113.
  12. Hofstede G. The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 1983, vol. 14, iss. 2, pp. 75–89.
  13. Peterson S., Galvin S., Galvin B., Lange D. CEO Servant Leadership: Exploring Executive Characteristics and Firm Performance. Personnel Psychologies, 2012, vol. 65, iss. 3, pp. 565–596.
  14. House R., Javidan M., Hanges P., Dorfman P. Understanding Cultures and Implicit Leadership Theories across the Globe: an Introduction to Project GLOBE. Journal of World Business, 2002, vol. 37, iss. 1, pp. 3–10.
  15. Caroll B., Patterson K. Servant Leadership: A Cross Cultural Study Between India and the United States. Servant Leadership: Theory & Practice, 2014, vol. 1, iss. 1, pp. 16–45.
  16. Mudragei N.S. [Rational and irrational is a philosophical problem. Reading A. Schopenhauer]. Voprosy filosofii = Issues of Philosophy, 1994, no. 9, pp. 53–65. (In Russ.)
  17. Gumerova G.I., Shaimieva E.Sh. [Formulating conceptual clauses of the organizational knowledge management model: a theoretical and methodological approach. Empirical evidence]. Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava = Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2013, no. 3, pp. 71–82. (In Russ.)
  18. Pudovkina N.G. [Mental models as the basis of obstacles and analytical activities]. Vektor nauki Tol'yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. Pedagogika, psikhologiya = Vector of Science of Togliatti State University. Series Pedagogy, Psychology, 2012, no. 1, pp. 349–352. (In Russ.)
  19. Filonovich S.R. [Issues of knowledge management: the origin and cross-disciplinary nature]. Ekonomicheskie strategii = Economic Strategies, 2010, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 76–81. (In Russ.)
  20. Robbins S. Osnovy organizatsionnogo povedeniya [Essentials of Organizational Behavior]. Moscow, Vil'yams Publ., 2006, 448 p.
  21. Gorokhova E.Yu. Sotsial'naya tekhnologiya upravleniya znaniem v mnogonatsional'noi organizatsii [Social technology of knowledge management in multinational organizations]. Moscow, Editus Publ., 2013, 222 p.
  22. Vasil'eva A.F. Servisnoe gosudarstvo: administrativno-pravovoe issledovanie okazaniya publichnykh uslug v Germanii i Rossii [The Servant State: administrative and legislative research into the delivery of public services in Germany and Russia]. Moscow, RAP Publ., 2012, 332 p.
  23. Karlovskaya E.A. [Servicization in public administration: formulation of issues]. Uchenye zapiski Komsomol'skogo-na-Amure gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Scholarly Notes of Komsomolsk-na-Amure State Technical University, 2011, no. 4, pp. 87–92. (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 16, Iss. 5
May 2020