Larin S.N.Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation larinsn@cemi.rssi.ru
Sokolov N.A.Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation sokolov@cemi.rssi.ru
Importance Considering economic sanctions against Russia, it is necessary to revise the existing programs for S&T development of certain regions and industries, develop new ones and focus them on domestic manufacturers and resources. However, it is practicable to draw upon developed economies' experience in the development and implementation of such programs. Objectives The research identifies promising models for articulating S&T programs, which were successfully probated abroad, and opportunities for using their mechanisms to efficiently implement identical programs in the country. Methods Russia applied methods of strategic planning and project financing as the methodological basis for scientific and technological programs. The EU countries, on the contrary, initially determine priority areas for scientific researches, with researches being conducted on a competitive basis. Framework and special programs play a leading role in the development of innovative researches. They employ the model for the single European research space and actively involve private businesses, contemporary financial mechanisms and information technologies. Results We found new models and mechanisms to run scientific and technological programs and presented them in the article. Conclusions and Relevance New approaches and methods the EU uses to form and implement contemporary S&T programs are practicable and advisable for Russia. In this respect, they should be adapted to the Russian economy, with pointing out the most promising ones for future S&T programs.
Etzkowitz H. Troinaya spiral'. Universitety – predpriyatiya – gosudarstvo. Innovatsii v deistvii [The Triple Helix. University–Industry–Government. Innovation in Action]. Tomsk, Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics Publ., 2010, 238 p.
Tikhonov I.P., Petrovskii A.B. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya, orientirovannye na prakticheskii rezul'tat: podkhody k otsenke effektivnosti [Fundamental researches oriented at practical results]. Vestnik RAN = Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2009, vol. 79, no. 11, pp. 1006–1011.
Bloshenko A.V., Sakharova N.A., Kholstov A.V. Analiz osobennostei formirovaniya i organizatsii vypolneniya sovremennykh nauchno-tekhnicheskikh programm v Rossii i za rubezhom. V kn.: Modeli i metody innovatsionnoi ekonomiki. Vypusk 6 [Analyzing the specifics how S&T programs are formed and implemented in Russia and abroad]. Moscow, CEMI RAS, IASS Publ., 2014, 213 p.
Larin S.N. Methodological Foundations of Monitoring Events Scientific and Technical Programs. Papers of the 8th International Scientific Conference European Applied Sciences: Modern Approaches in Scientific Researches. Stuttgart, ORT Publishing, 2014, 206 p.
Borisov S.A., Plekhanova A.F. Sravnitel'nyi analiz proektnogo i protsessnogo podkhodov v upravlenii innovatsionnoi deyatel'nost'yu [A comparative analysis of project and process-based approaches to innovative activity management]. Rossiiskoe predprinimatel'stvo = Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2013, no. 13, pp. 91–96.
Gray C.F., Larson E.W. Upravlenie proektami. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo [Project Management: The Managerial Process]. Moscow, Ai-Ti Publ., 2007, 528 p.
Kommertsializatsiya rezul'tatov nauchno-tekhnicheskoi deyatel'nosti: evropeiskii opyt, vozmozhnye uroki dlya Rossii [Commercialization of R&D results: European experience, possible lessons for Russia]. Moscow, TsIPRAN RAN Publ., 2006, 264 p.
Artis M.J., Nixson F. The Economics of the European Union: Policy and Analysis. 4th ed. Oxford University Press, 2007.
Ivashkov A.V. Logika razvitiya nauchno-tekhnicheskoi politiki Evropeiskogo Soyuza: realizatsiya printsipa sistemnosti v nauchno-tekhnicheskoi integratsii [Reasoning behind the development of the EU scientific and technological policies: performance of the consistency principle in S&T integration]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal, 2007, no. 296, pp. 160–164.
Innovatsionnaya politika budushchego [Innovative policies of the future]. Moscow, OOO Ernst and Young Publ., 2011, 40 p.
Hirooka M. Innovation Dynamism and Economic Growth: A Nonlinear Perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006.
Chesbrough H. Otkrytye innovatsii: sozdanie pribyl'nykh tekhnologii [Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology]. Moscow, Pokolenie Publ., 2007, 336 p.
Bossink B. The Development of Co-innovation Strategies: Stages and Interaction Patterns in Interfirm Innovation. R&D Management, 2002, vol. 32, iss. 4, pp. 311–320.
Clarysse B., Degroof J.I.J., Heirman A. Analysis of the Typical Growth Path of Technology-Based Companies in Life Sciences and Information Technology, and the Role of Different Sources of Innovation Financing. Brussels, European Commission, Enterprise Directorate-General, 2010.
Larin S.N., Lazareva L.Y. Economic Benefits and Challenges of the Scientific and Industrial Organizations in the Regional Innovation Infrastructure. Proc. 1st Int. Sci. Conf. Science Progress in European Countries: New Concepts and Modern Solutions. Stuttgart, 2013, ORT Publishing, vol. 3, 140 p.
