Pronichkin S.V.Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation pronichkin@mail.ru
Importance It is important to empirically study the absorption capability of State scientific and technical programs and their results, since such programs involve R&D and experimental work exposed to high risk and uncertainty of final results. Objectives The research aims at smoothing malfunction of Russia's innovative system in diffusion of results of State scientific and technical programs. I also point out the malfunction of Russia's national innovative system in diffusion of results of State scientific and technical programs, and provide my ideas for alleviating it. Methods The research draws upon a set of empirical methods: questionnaire, survey, and examination. As the methodological underpinning for the systems analysis of absorption capability of the results, I applied methods for verbal analysis of solutions and the multiset theory, principles of a systems approach, general scientific methods: classification and structural analysis, combination of logic and functional methods, identification of cause-and-effect relations. Results I provide methodological recommendations for arranging and holding a comprehensive examination of results of special-purposes State scientific and technical programs and performed a systems analysis of their absorption capability using the method of group and multivariate decision making. Conclusions and Relevance The article identifies some areas for further improvements since the implementation of the results will entail significant expenditures and require production and ancillary space, staff training and other aspects.
Keywords: systems analysis, national innovative system, malfunction, diffusion, scientific and technical results, actor, innovative system
References:
Pronichkin S.V. [Developing a competence-based model of the expert for independent evaluation of universities' activities]. Dni nauki MISiS: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi, mezhvuzovskoi i institutskoi nauchno-tekhnicheskoi konferentsii [Proc. Int. Sci. Conf. Science Days in MISiS]. Moscow, MISiS Publ., 2009, pp. 399–400.
Larichev O.I. Verbal'nyi analiz reshenii [Verbal analysis of decisions]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2006, 286 p.
Smith K. Innovation Infrastructures. Regional Development and Conditions for Innovation in the Network Society. Purdue University Press, 2005, pp. 17–34.
Watkins A., Papaioannou T., Mugwagwa J., Kale D. National Innovation Systems and the Intermediary Role of Industry Associations in Building Institutional Capacities for Innovation in Developing Countries. Research Policy, 2015, vol. 44, iss. 8, pp. 1407–1418.
Malerba F. Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production. Research Policy, 2002, vol. 31, pp. 247–264.
Golichenko O.G., Samovoleva S.A. Gosudarstvennaya politika v natsional'noi innovatsionnoi sisteme: teoriya i praktika [National policy as part of the national innovative system: theory and practice]. Innovatsii = Innovation, 2014, no. 10, pp. 83–94.
Venkataraman R., Pinto J. Cost and Value Management in Projects. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, 2008, 348 p.
Arnold E. Evaluating Research and Innovation Policy: A Systems World Needs Systems Evaluations. Research Evaluation, 2004, vol. 13, iss. 1, pp. 3–17.
Pun H., Heese S. A Note on Budget Allocation for Market Research and Advertising. International Journal of Production Economics,2015, vol. 166, pp. 85–89.
Jeroen P., Hippel E., Gault F., Kuusisto J., Raasch Ch. Market Failure in the Diffusion of Consumer-Developed Innovations. Research Policy, 2015, vol. 44, iss. 10, pp. 1856–1865.
Wu Ing-Long, Chiu Mai-Lun. Organizational Applications of IT Innovation and Firm's Competitive Performance: A Resource-Based View and the Innovation Diffusion Approach. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2015, vol. 35, pp. 25–44.
Teece D. Forward Integration and Innovation: Transaction Costs and Beyond. Journal of Retailing, 2010, vol. 86, iss. 3, pp. 277–283.
Nematollahi O., Alamdari P., Assari M. Experimental Investigation of a Dual Purpose Solar Heating System. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, vol. 78, pp. 359–366.
Ferreira E.M., Balestieri J.A.P., Zanardi M.A. Optimization Analysis of Dual-Purpose Systems. Desalination, 2010, vol. 250, pp. 936–944.
Wu Y., Welch E., Huang W.-L. Commercialization of University Inventions: Individual and Institutional Factors Affecting Licensing of University Patents. Technovation, 2015, vol. 36-37, pp. 12–25.
Onishi K. The Effects of Compensation Plans for Employee Inventions on R&D Productivity: New Evidence from Japanese Panel Data. Research Policy, 2013, vol. 42, iss. 2, pp. 367–378.
Barirani A., Beaudry C., Agard B. Distant Recombination and the Creation of Basic Inventions: An Analysis of the Diffusion of Public and Private Sector Nanotechnology Patents in Canada. Technovation, 2015, vol. 36, pp. 39–52.
Parhankangas A., Ehrlich M. How Entrepreneurs Seduce Business Angels: An Impression Management Approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 2014, vol. 29, iss. 4, pp. 543–564.
Kleer R. Government R&D Subsidies as a Signal for Private Investors. Research Policy, 2010, vol. 39, iss. 10, pp. 1361–1374.
Firth C. The Disposition Effect in the Absence of Taxes. Economics Letters, 2015, vol. 136, pp. 55–58.
Dyreng S., Lindsey B., Markle K., Shackelford D. The Effect of Tax and Nontax Country Characteristics on the Global Equity Supply Chains of U.S. Multinationals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2015, vol. 59, iss. 2-3, pp. 182–202.
Kang K. Asymmetries and Tariff-Tax Reforms in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation: A Quantitative Assessment. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 2007, vol. 4, iss. 1, pp. 89–97.
Wihantoro Y., Lowe A., Cooper S., Manochin M. Bureaucratic Reform in Post-Asian Crisis Indonesia: The Directorate Generate of Tax. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2015, vol. 31, pp. 44–63.
