+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ÈÄ «Ôèíàíñû è êðåäèò»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Administrative and economic mechanisms for driving innovative development: Evidence from Germany and the Nordic countries

Vol. 11, Iss. 47, DECEMBER 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 10 September 2015

Accepted: 29 September 2015

Available online: 24 December 2015

Subject Heading: INNOVATION AND INVESTMENT

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 53-66

Balashova S.A. Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation
sveta.b2@gmail.com

Shpolyanskaya A.A. Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation
a.a.rogozhnikova@gmail.com

Importance The research deals with the State economic policy for innovation and examines the expertise of the Nordic countries.
     Objectives We analyze the State aid methods for innovative development of the leading European countries, systematize financial and non-financial mechanisms for stimulating innovative activities.
     Methods The research relies upon a comparative analysis of tools the State policy envisages for innovative development of the Nordic countries and Germany. The analysis is based on such publicly available sources of information as Eurostat, OECD database and library, European Commission's reports, documents of ministries and agencies.
     Results We identified the most common tools of the innovation policy and financial and non-financial measures addressing the contemporary global challenges in order to secure the national interests of the countries.
     Conclusions and Relevance Many developing countries have just embarked on their innovative development process. It is rather complicated to formulate strategies, effective supporting instruments and tools in line with economic and historical specifics. It is necessary to consider the positive and negative experience of the leading countries. Precise and elaborate strategies of the Nordic countries and Germany became the cornerstone for big achievements on the way towards the innovative economy. Those achievements were made with a set of measures undertaken by the State and private institutions.

Keywords: strategy, key indicators, financial, non-financial instruments, innovation policy

References:

  1. Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B. Europe’s R&D: Missing the Wrong Targets? Interconomics, 2008, no. 43, iss. 4, pp. 220–225.
  2. Mauer B., Fiedler S. Innovationweltmeister. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. Weinheim, 2011, p. 374.
  3. Belitz H. Volkswirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Technologie- und Innovationsförderung im Mittelstand. Berlin, DIW, 2012, p. 284.
  4. Fagerberg J., Fosaas M. Innovation and Innovation Policy in the Nordic Region. Oslo, Fafo, 2014, pp. 1–31.
  5. Ejermo O., Kander A. The Swedish Paradox. Circle, 2006, no. 1, pp. 1–54.
  6. Ejermo O., Kander A., Hannening M.S. The R&D-growth Paradox Arises in Fast-growing Sectors. Research Policy, 2011, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 664–672.
  7. Khrustalev E.Yu., Slavyanov A.S. Labor Migration and Problems of Innovative Development. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2014, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 63–68.
  8. Ali-Yrkkö J. Nokia and Finland in a Sea of Change. Helsinki, ETLA – Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, 2010, p. 118.
  9. Balashova S.A. Otsenka vliyaniya gosudarstvennoi sistemy finansirovaniya NIOKR na predprinimatel'skii sektor (na primere stran OESR) [Assessing the impact of the State finance system for R&D on the business sector (evidence from the OECD)]. Prikladnaya ekonometrika = Applied Econometrics, 2015, no. 2, pp. 64–82.
  10. Gribovskii A.V., Ushakova S.E. Mekhanizmy gosudarstvennoi podderzhki malogo innovatsionnogo biznesa za rubezhom [Mechanisms for the State support of small innovative businesses in foreign countries]. Nauka. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie = Science. Innovation. Education, 2014, no. 16, pp. 205–221.
  11. Mikhailov A.S. Formirovanie mezhdunarodnykh klasterov v Baltiiskom regione [Development of international clusters in the Baltic Sea region]. Baltiiskii region = Baltic Region, 2013, no. 1, pp. 53–66.
  12. Hottenrott H., Peters B. Innovative Capability and Financing Constraints for Innovation: More Money, More Innovation? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2012, vol. 94, iss. 4, pp. 1126–1142.
  13. Huelskamp N., Koppel O. Förderung unternehmerischer. Innovation in Deutschland. Muenich, Roman Herzog Institute, 2006, p. 52.
  14. Röhl K. Venture Capital: Ein neuer Anlauf zur Erleichterung von Wagniskapitalfinanzierungen. Koeln, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft Koeln. IW Policy Paper, 2014, no. 6, pp. 1–16.
  15. Steden S. Das System der Finanzierung von Technologieentwicklung am Beispiel der Photovoltaik-Industrie. Wiesbaden, Springer VS, 2015, p. 374.
  16. Paraskevopoulou E. Non-technological Regulatory Effects: Implications for Innovation and Innovation Policy. Research Policy, 2012, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1058–1071.
  17. Freeman C., Soete L. Developing Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators: What We Can Learn from the Past. Research Policy, 2009, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 583–589.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive