+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Issues of substituting lost income of the Russian economy from exports of energy resources when changing technological modes in the power engineering sector

Vol. 11, Iss. 47, DECEMBER 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 31 August 2015

Accepted: 8 September 2015

Available online: 24 December 2015

Subject Heading: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 40-52

Klochkov V.V. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
vlad_klochkov@mail.ru

Danilin M.N. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
maksdanilin@gmail.com

Importance The research analyzes how changes in technological modes of the power engineering sector influence the Russian economy.
     Objectives The research assesses how lost income of the Russian economy depends on export of energy resources when the power engineering sector switches to new technological modes. We also determine the target share of the Russian producers in the global markets of energy equipment, which would help compensate the lost income.
     Methods We propose a simplified model of total input the fuel and power engineering sectors make into Russia's GDP. The article overviews typical scenarios of technological development of the global power engineering in terms of changes in energy production costs.
     Results When shifting to mainly renewable sources of energy, the Russian manufacturing sectors should occupy the same share in the global market of energy equipment as currently occupied in the global markets of energy sources. As the technologies progress, the required market share may shrink.
     Conclusions and Relevance It will be reasonable to diversify the export markets of the Russian energy resources and enter the global market of construction of nuclear energy facilities in the short run. In the long run, an increase in energy affordability and reduction in energy consumption rates of technologies in other sectors may indirectly influence the Russian economy, and this effect may be much stronger than changes in revenues of the fuel and energy sector and power engineering sector.

Keywords: green energy, power engineering, export, cost structure, trends, technological development

References:

  1. Plakitkin Yu.A. Mirovaya energetika – zakonomernosti global'nogo razvitiya [Global energy sector: patterns of global development]. Ekonomicheskie strategii = Economic Strategies, 2012, no. 1, pp. 24–33.
  2. Dolgushev D.V. Osoboe mesto Rossii na mirovom energeticheskom rynke [Russia's special role in the world energy market]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal, 2008, no. 2, pp. 93–104.
  3. Zhiznin S.Z. Energeticheskaya diplomatiya Rossii: ekonomika, politika, praktika [Energy diplomacy of Russia: economics, policy, practice]. Moscow, Ist Bruk Publ., 2005, 638 p.
  4. Cherkasenko A.I. Razvitie vneshneekonomicheskikh otnoshenii v yaderno-energeticheskoi otrasli v usloviyakh globalizatsii [Developing foreign trade relations in the nuclear energy sector during globalization]. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki = Problems of Modern Economics, 2006, no. 1-2, pp. 103–110.
  5. Vivoda V. Diversification of Oil Import Sources and Energy Security: a Key Strategy or Elusive Objective. Energy Policy, 2009, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 4615–4623.
  6. Konoplyanik A. Energy Security and the Development of International Energy Markets. Energy Security: Managing Risk in a Dynamic Legal and Regulatory Environment. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 47–84.
  7. Constantini V., Gracceva F., Markandya A., Vicini G. Security of Energy Supply: Comparing Scenarios from a European Perspective. Energy Policy, 2007, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 210–226.
  8. Gnansounou E. Assessing the Energy Vulnerability: Case of Industrialized Countries. Energy Policy, 2008, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 3734–3744.
  9. Dale B., Huber J. Samoe zelenoe toplivo [The Fuel of the Future is Grassoline]. V mire nauki = In the World of Science, 2011, no. 9, pp. 26–33.
  10. Bolbot E.A., Klochkov V.V. Sistemnyi analiz riskov vnedreniya “zelenykh” tekhnologii [A systems analysis of the risk of the green technology implementation]. Ekonomika prirodopol'zovaniya = Economy of Natural Resource Use, 2012, no. 1, pp. 78–100.
  11. Saunders H. The Khazzoom-Brookes Postulate and Neoclassical Growth. The Energy Journal, 1992, vol. 13, iss. 4, pp. 131–148.
  12. Vikström P. Energy Efficiency and Energy Demand: A Historical CGE Investigation on the Rebound Effect in the Swedish Economy. Umea, Sweden, Umeå University, 2004.
  13. Shkradyuk I.E. Tendentsii razvitiya vozobnovlyaemykh istochnikov energii v Rossii i mire [Trends in the development of renewable energy sources in Russia and worldwide]. Moscow, Russia’s WWF Publ., 2010, 88 p.
  14. Blanco M.I. The Economics of Wind Energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, vol. 13, no. 6-7, pp. 1372–1382.
  15. Strubegger M., Reitgruber I. Statistical Analysis of Investment Costs for Power Generation Technologies. IIASA Workpaper, WP-95-109. Laxenburg, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 1995.
  16. Luft G. What does America’s Shale Gas Revolution Mean for China? Journal of Energy Security, 2013, no. 7.
  17. Ivanov N.A. Slantsevaya Amerika: energeticheskaya politika SShA i osvoenie netraditsionnykh neftegazovykh resursov: monografiya [Slate America: energy policy of the United States and the development of unconventional oil and gas resources: a monograph]. Moscow, Magistr Publ., 2014, 304 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive