+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Developing the institution of cross-border insolvency in terms of increasing the investment attractiveness of the Russian Federation

Vol. 11, Iss. 44, NOVEMBER 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 31 July 2015

Accepted: 4 August 2015

Available online: 20 November 2015

Subject Heading: INNOVATION AND INVESTMENT

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 28-37

Belousov A.L. North-West Institute, Branch of Kutafin Moscow State Law University, Vologda, Russian Federation
andreybelousov@mail.ru

Pavlov R.K. Praktika Advocate Firm, Vologda, Russian Federation
r.pavlov.k@ya.ru

Importance An independent court system and stable and adequate legislation determine the national investment attractiveness. It gets especially relevant for regulating insolvency matters. Whereas foreign businesses operate in Russia, it requires considering international laws on insolvency of businesses. Thus unified laws and implementation of international laws will secure the investors' rights and interests and increase the investment attractiveness of the Russian Federation.
     Objectives The research seeks for ways of improving the investment climate in the Russian Federation by amending the existing laws, regulating the insolvency procedure and considering the presence of foreign business.
     Methods The research applies methods of comparison, analysis and dialectics, focusing on regulation of cross-border insolvency procedures.
     Conclusions and Relevance Considering sanctions, relevant restrictions and negative phenomena in the Russian economy, a versatile model of cross-border solvency may become one of the tools to increase the investment attractiveness of the State. The model will help protect investors' interests when they are involved in insolvency procedures.

Keywords: investments, cross-border insolvency, insolvency, debtors, creditors

References:

  1. Ryaguzov A.A. Transgranichnaya nesostoyatel'nost' v rossiiskom prave [Cross-border insolvency in the Russian law]. Yuridicheskii mir = Legal World, 2007, no. 6, pp. 69–72.
  2. Aukhatov A.Ya. Pravosposobnost' kompanii pri perenesenii mestonakhozhdeniya pravleniya za granitsu (po materialam prava ES i FRG) [The legal capacity of companies in transferring the management board abroad (based on the EU and Germany materials)]. Yurist = Jurist, 2006, no. 1, pp. 23–27.
  3. Mokhova E.V. Tsentr osnovnykh interesov dolzhnika pri transgranichnoi nesostoyatel'nosti: perspektivy vvedeniya v Rossii novykh pravovykh konstruktsii [The focus of the debtor’s main interests in cross-border insolvency: prospects of introducing new legal structures in Russia]. Zakon = Law, 2012, no. 10, pp. 111–127.
  4. Wouters N., Raykin A. Corporate Group Cross-Border Insolvencies between the US and EU: Legal and Economic Developments. Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal, 2013, vol. 29, iss. 2, p. 387.
  5. Bufford S. Centre of Main Interests, International Insolvency Case Venue, and Equality of Arms: The Eurofood Decision of the European Court of Justice. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 2007, vol. 27, iss. 2, pp. 351–415.
  6. Shaxson N. Treasure Islands: Uncovering the Damage of Offshore Banking and Tax Havens. Palgrave MacMillan, 2012, 264 p.
  7. Muranov A.I. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po primeneniyu Gaagskikh konventsii po voprosam mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava i mezhdunarodnogo grazhdanskogo protsessa [Methodological recommendations for applying the Hague convention on private international law and international civil procedure]. Vestnik Federal'noi Palaty Advokatov RF = Bulletin of the Federal Chamber of Advocates, 2012, no. 3, pp. 47–58.
  8. Saiganova L.N. Bankrotstvo transnatsional'nykh kompanii i rossiiskoe pravo [Bankruptcy of transnational companies and the Russian laws]. Rossiiskoe predprinimatel'stvo = Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2011, no. 6, pp. 20–26.
  9. Skvortsov O. Russian Insolvency Law – Yet Another Step Forward? International Features. Corporate Rescue and Insolvency, 2009, no. 5, p. 198.
  10. Sjostrand E. Russian Insolvency Law: an Overview of Legislation. Tolley’s Insolvency Law and Practice, 2006, no. 22, p. 105.
  11. Stepanov V.V. Problemy transgranichnoi nesostoyatel'nosti [Issues of cross-border insolvency]. Moskovskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava = Moscow Journal of International Law, 1998, no. 3, pp. 115–134.
  12. Mokhova E.V. Potrebnosti i perspektivy regulirovaniya transgranichnoi nesostoyatel'nosti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Needs and prospects of regulating cross-border insolvency in the Russian Federation]. Rossiiskoe pravosudie = Russian Justice, 2013, no. 4, pp. 54–66.
  13. Wessel R. The Changing Landscape of Cross-border Insolvency Law in Europe. Juridica International Law Review, 2007, iss. 12, pp. 116–124.
  14. Moss G., Fletcher I., Isaacs S. The EC Regulation on Insolvency Proceedings: A Commentary and Annotated Guide. Oxford University Press, Second Edition, 2009, 436 p.
  15. Fletcher J.F. Insolvency in Private International Law. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 11–17, 495–508.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive