+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Areas for optimizing the Russian model of retirement benefits in terms of the theory of economic interests

Vol. 11, Iss. 44, NOVEMBER 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 29 July 2015

Accepted: 4 August 2015

Available online: 20 November 2015

Subject Heading: ECONOMIC POLICY OF THE STATE

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 2-11

Tumanyants K.A. Volgograd State University, Volgograd, Russian Federation
tka210@gmail.com

Timofeeva G.V. Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russian Federation
tgvolga@yandex.ru

Timofeev Yu.V. Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
y.timofeev@fs.de

Importance Previous reforms failed to create a financially and socially stable pension system in Russia. Therefore, it is still relevant to search for optimal variants of reforms in this.
     Objective The paper validates the proposed reforms of the Russian retirement benefits model using the theory of economic interests.
     Methods We identify specific features of economic interests relating to retirement benefits and analyze differences in motivation, thereby revealing probable conflicts in the pension system. Finally, we choose ways to organize retirement benefits to harmonize the process of implementing different economic interests.
     Results Considering the specifics of pension relations, short-term, long-term, true and imaginary economic interests should be distinguished. The current model fails to enable parties of pension relations to completely implement their economic interests. Various social groups usually face conflicts of interest concerning reasons for, and the amount of retirement benefits, source and methods for financing pension liabilities, mechanism for capitalizing pension contributions.
     Conclusions and Relevance Based on obligatory individual savings, retirement benefits seem to be the best possible compromise to satisfy different economic interests. Protective pension plans need to be cancelled, while people who have not accumulated enough money should be financially secured with versatile parish relief fund.

Keywords: economic interests, retirement benefit plan, pension contribution, pension savings

References:

  1. Kant I. Sochineniya. Tom 4, Chast' 1 [Russian edition. Works. Volume 4, Part 1]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1965, 478 p.
  2. Zdravomyslov A.G. Potrebnosti. Interesy. Tsennosti [Needs. Interests. Values]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1986, 223 p.
  3. Kanapukhin P.A. Protivorechiya sistemy ekonomicheskikh interesov i ikh samovosproizvodstvo [Contradictions in a system of economic interests and their self-reproduction]. Sovremennaya ekonomika: problemy i resheniya = Modern Economy: Problems and Solutions, 2010, no. 6, pp. 28–37.
  4. Bel'chenko O.A., Sayapin A.V. Khozyaistvennyi mekhanizm realizatsii ekonomicheskikh interesov sub"ektov ekonomiki kak faktor effektivnogo razvitiya proizvodstva [Economic mechanism for the realization of economic interests of the economy as a factor of effective production development]. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy = Socio-economic Phenomena and Processes, 2011, no. 11, pp. 31–34.
  5. Caliendo F., Gahramanov E. Myopia and Pensions in General Equilibrium. Journal of Economics and Finance, 2013, vol. 37, iss. 3, pp. 375–401.
  6. Thaler R., Sunstein C. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, Yale University Press, 2008.
  7. Gershkovich B.Ya. Ekonomicheskie interesy i ikh realizatsiya [Economic interests and their implementation]. Pyatigorsk, Pyatigorsk State Linguistic University Publ., 1999, 180 p.
  8. Peillon M. The Concept of Interest in Social Theory. Edwin Mellen Press Ltd., 1990.
  9. Thaler R.H., Tversky A., Kahneman D., Schwartz A. The Effect of Myopia and Loss Aversion on Risk Taking. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 647–661.
  10. Zdravomyslov A.G. Problema interesa v sotsiologicheskoi teorii [The issue of interest in the sociological theory]. Leningrad, LSU Publ., 1964, 96 p.
  11. Bentham J. Vvedenie v osnovaniya nravstvennosti i zakonodatel'stva [Introduction to Principles of Morals and Legislation]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 1998, 416 p.
  12. Rubinshtein A.Ya. Gruppy i ikh interesy: priglashenie k diskussii [Groups and their interests: the point for discussion]. Voprosy Economiki, 2006, no. 11, pp. 80–94.
  13. Tumanyants K.A., Timofeeva G.V., Timofeev Yu.V., Utuchenkova M.V. Rossiiskaya model' pensionnoi sistemy: formirovanie, osobennosti, rezul'taty realizatsii [The Russian model of the pension system: formation, specifics, implementation results]. Volgograd, VSU Publ., 2014, 282 p.
  14. Loewenstein G., Ubel P. Hedonic Adaptation and the Role of Decision and Experience Utility in Public Policy. Journal of Public Economics, 2008, vol. 92, iss. 8-9, pp. 1795–1810.
  15. Cordo V., Schmidt-Hebbel K. Macroeconomic Effects of Pension Reform in Chile. In: Pension Reforms: Results and Challenges. Santiago, International Federation of Pension Funds Administrators (FIAP), 2003.
  16. Tumanyants K., Samarskii G. Forecasting the Reliability of the Mechanism of Guaranteeing Retirement Savings in Russia Using Stress Testing. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2015, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 260–266.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive