Importance The article discusses the US shale revolution. Scientists, businessmen and policymakers try to assess how this phenomenon influences the global gas market and global energy resource market. Objectives The research constitutes an original comprehensive research into consequences of the shale revolution for the world and Russia. Methods The research employs a comparative statistical analysis to analyze aggregate data on extraction, export and reserves of natural and shale gas. Results The article demonstrates that the shale revolution is covered with a lot of myths, which engendered its active supporters and protesters. The existing technologies may entail hazardous consequences for the environment, so that they should not be regarded as an alternative to natural gas production. Conclusions and Relevance We conclude that, notwithstanding numerous disputes between the shale gas supporters and protesters, it is quite evident that these are the American gas production companies and the US establishment who benefit from this shale revolution.
Keywords: shale revolution, shale gas, geopolitics, Russia, USA
References:
Hadro J. Shale gas exploration strategy. Przeglad Geologiczny, 2010, vol. 58, pp. 250–258.
Nyquist S., Lund S. Shale Revolution: Opportunity to Jump-Start Economic Growth. Available at: Link. (accessed 19.11.2014)
Cathles L.M., Brown L., Taam M., Hunter A. A Commentary on ‘The Greenhouse Gas Footprint of Natural Gas in Shale Formations’ by R.W. Howarth, R. Santoro, and Anthony Ingraffea. Climatic Change, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0333-0
Zharkov A.M. Otsenka potentsiala slantsevykh uglevodorodov Rossii[Evaluation of the potential of shale carbohydrates in Russia]. Mineral'nye resursy Rossii. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Mineral Resources of Russia. Economics and Management, 2011, no. 3, pp. 16–21.
Kotomin A.B. “Slantsevaya revolyutsiya” i perspektivy razvitiya rossiiskoi gazovoi otrasli [The shale revolution and perspectives of development of Russia’s gas industry]. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka = North & Market: Forming the Economic Order, 2014, vol. 1, no. 38, pp. 88–94.
Abiteboul J. What is the Time Line for LNG Exports from the USA? Presentation to the Flame Conference. Amsterdam, 2012, April 18.
Ebinger C., Massy K., Avasarala G. Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for US Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas. Policy Brief 12–01, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution, May, 2012.
Froggatt A., Mitchell C., Manaqi S. Reset or Restart? The Impact of Fukushima on the Japanese and German Energy Sectors. Briefing Paper, Chatham House, July, 2012.
Ridley M. The Shale Gas Shock. GWPF Report 2, Global Warming Policy Foundation, London, 2011.
Robart J. Water Management Economics in the Development and Production of Shale Resources. IAEE Energy Forum, First Quarter, 2012.
Stevens P. The Arab Uprisings and the International Oil Markets. Briefing Paper, Chatham House, February, 2012.
Tollefson J. Air Sampling Reveals High Emissions from Gas Field. Nature, 2012, vol. 482, pp. 139–140.
Wood R., Gilbert P., Sharmina M., Anderson K., Footitt A., Glynn S., Nicholls F. Shale Gas: A Provisional Assessment of Climate Change and Environmental Impacts. Tyndall Centre Technical Reports, 2011.
Slantsevaya revolyutsiya: kommentarii ekspertov [The shale revolution: experts’ comments]. Akademiya energetiki = Academy of Energetics, 2012, no. 6, pp. 48–49.