+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Issues of considering the interval uncertainty in evaluating the efficiency of investment projects in Russia's non-stationary economy

Vol. 11, Iss. 30, AUGUST 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 7 April 2015

Accepted: 14 April 2015

Available online: 28 August 2015

Subject Heading: INNOVATION AND INVESTMENT

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 38-47

Savilov S.I. Institute for Systems Analysis of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
savilovstepan@gmail.com

Importance Investment projects often allow increasing production volumes, cutting costs, solving some environmental, social issues and accelerating the pace of economic growth at the level of the entity and the State. Implementation of innovation often turns to be a long and expensive process. That is why it is so important to select projects at the pre-investment stage. Whereas the project is evaluated before its implementation, and indicators and scenarios are not clear, it is important to assess uncertainty and risks. The research focuses on the interval uncertainty that is especially interesting as one of the most frequent situations, when possible effects are known, but not the probability of their occurrence.
     Objectives The research determines issues of contemporary methods and models for evaluating the efficiency of investment projects under the interval uncertainty in the non-stationary economy of Russia.
     Methods Using methods of systems analysis, I investigate national and foreign literature on the interval uncertainty.
     Results I make up a pivot table on approaches to considering the interval uncertainty, and describe weaknesses in the Hurwicz criterion used in Russia. The article presents a critical analysis of the criterion substantiation, indicating weaknesses. I suggest using a more specific concept of the interval uncertainty, thus reducing the frequency of using this model.
     Conclusions and Relevance The article demonstrates the need to further develop approaches to evaluating the efficiency of projects under risks and uncertainty, and formulating a more accurate method for considering the interval uncertainty. The method should implement the above comments, thus increasing the quality and reasonableness of investment solutions.

Keywords: interval uncertainty, Hurwicz criterion, evaluation, investment projects, non-stationary economy

References:

  1. Alenikov A.S., Makarov M.V. Instrumentarii sistemnogo analiza i ego primenenie pri modelirovanii nestatsionarnoi ekonomiki [Instruments of systems analysis in application to modeling of non-stationary economy]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National Interests: Priorities and Security, 2014, no. 4, pp. 36–46.
  2. Belousova N.I., Bushanskii S.P., Vasil'eva E.M. et al. Informatsionnaya tekhnologiya sinteza slozhnykh setevykh struktur nestatsionarnoi rossiiskoi ekonomiki: modeli, algoritmy, programmnaya realizatsiya [Information technology for synthesis of complex network structures in the non-stationary Russian economy: models, algorithms, software implementation]. Audit i finansovyi analiz = Audit and Financial Analysis, 2008, no. 1, pp. 50–88.
  3. Bendikov M.A., Khrustalev E.Yu. Evolyutsiya kontseptsii i mekhanizma upravleniya konversiei v usloviyakh perekhodnoi rossiiskoi ekonomiki [The evolution of the concept and mechanism for managing the conversion in the transitional Russian economy]. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii = Economic Science in Modern Russia, 1998, no. 3, pp. 108–120.
  4. Vilenskii P.L., Livshits V.N., Orlova E.R. et al. Kratkie prakticheskie ukazaniya po otsenke effektivnosti investitsionnykh proektov (metodicheskie rekomendatsii) [Concise practical guidelines on evaluation of the efficiency of investment projects (methodological guidelines)]. Moscow, Chamber of Commerce and Industry Publ., 2005, 67 p.
  5. Kostyuk V.N. Nestatsionarnaya ekonomika: vliyanie rosta slozhnosti na ekonomicheskoe razvitie [Non-stationary economy: an effect of increased complexity on the economic development]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2013, 272 p.
  6. Livshits V.N. Sistemnyi analiz rynochnogo reformirovaniya nestatsionarnoi ekonomiki Rossii: 1999–2013 [System analysis of the market reform of non-stationary Russian economy: 1999–2013]. Moscow, LENAND Publ., 2013, 640 p.
  7. Livshits V.N., Livshits S.V. Osobennosti otsenki effektivnosti investitsionnykh proektov v statsionarnoi i nestatsionarnoi ekonomikakh [Specifics of evaluating the efficiency of investment projects in stationary and non-stationary economies]. Byulleten' transportnoi informatsii = Bulletin of Transport Information, 2009, no. 5, pp. 8–15.
  8. Rutgaizer V.M. Nestatsionarnaya ekonomika Rossii i otsenochnaya deyatel'nost' [Non-stationary Russian economy and valuation]. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii = Property Relations in the Russian Federation, 2011, no. 1, pp. 61–64.
  9. Savilov S.I. Uchet vnutrishagovogo raspredeleniya finansovogo potoka pri otsenke effektivnosti investitsionnykh proektov v nestatsionarnoi ekonomike Rossii [Considering the financial flow allocation within the interval in evaluating the efficiency of investment projects in the non-stationary Russian economy]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2013, no. 17, pp. 10–14.
  10. Smolyak S.A. Otsenka effektivnosti investitsionnykh proektov v usloviyakh riska i neopredelennosti (teoriya ozhidaemogo effekta) [Evaluating the efficiency of investment projects under risks and uncertainty (the theory of expected effect)]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2002, 158 p.
  11. Venttsel' E.S. Issledovanie operatsii [Examination of operations]. Moscow, Sovetskoe radio Publ., 1972, 552 p.
  12. Dubrov A.M., Lagosha B.A., Khrustalev E.Yu. Modelirovanie riskovykh situatsii v ekonomike i biznese [Modeling risky situations in economy and business]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 2000, 176 p.
  13. Knyazevskaya N.V., Knyazevskii V.S. Prinyatie riskovannykh reshenii v ekonomike i biznese [Taking risky decisions in economy and business]. Moscow, Kontur Publ., 1998, 160 p.
  14. Krass M.S., Chuprynov B.P. Osnovy matematiki i ee prilozheniya v ekonomicheskom obrazovanii [Mathematics and its application in economic education]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2004, 688 p.
  15. Chernov V.A. Analiz kommercheskogo riska [Analyzing the business risk]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 1998, 128 p.
  16. Ekonomiko-matematicheskie metody i modeli [Economic-mathematical methods and models]. Minsk, BSEU Publ., 2000, 412 p.
  17. Livshits V.N. Marginal'nye rassuzhdeniya i inzhenerno-ekonomicheskaya praktika [Marginal reasoning and engineering and economic practice]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody = Economics and Mathematical Methods, 1999, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 105–113.
  18. Night F. Risk, neopredelennost' i pribyl' [Risk, Uncertainty and Profit]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2003, 360 p.
  19. Wald A. Posledovatel'nyi analiz [Sequential Analysis]. Moscow, Fizmatgiz Publ., 1960, 328 p.
  20. Savage L.J. The Foundations of Statistics. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1954, 294 p.
  21. Hurwicz L. Optimality Criteria for Decision Making under Ignorance. Cowles Commission Papers, 1951, no. 270, 370 p.
  22. Chambadal P. Razvitie i prilozheniya ponyatiya entropiya [Evolution et applications du concept d’ entropie]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1967, 280 p.
  23. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 1965, vol. 8, iss. 3, pp. 338–353.
  24. Germeier Yu.B. Vvedenie v teoriyu issledovaniya operatsii [Introduction to the theory of operations research]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1971, 384 p.
  25. Trukhaev R.I. Modeli prinyatiya reshenii v usloviyakh neopredelennosti [Models for decision making under uncertainty]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1981, 258 p.
  26. Trukhaev R.I., Lerner V.S. Dinamicheskie modeli protsessov prinyatiya reshenii [Dynamic models of decision-making processes]. Kishinev, Shtiintsa Publ., 1974, 260 p.
  27. Zhukovskii V.I., Salukvadze M.E. Mnogokriterial'nye zadachi upravleniya v usloviyakh neopredelennosti [Multicriteria management tasks under uncertainty]. Tbilisi, Metsniereba Publ., 1991, 128 p.
  28. Korolev O.L., Kussyi M.Yu., Sigal A.V. Primenenie entropii pri modelirovanii protsessov prinyatiya reshenii v ekonomike: monografiya [Applying entropy in modeling decision-making processes in economy: a monograph]. Simferopol, Odzhak” Publ., 2013, 148 p.
  29. Labsker L.G. Teoriya kriteriev optimal'nosti i ekonomicheskie resheniya: monografiya [The theory of optimality criteria and economic decisions: a monograph]. Moscow, KnoRus Publ., 2014, 742 p.
  30. Vilenskii P.L., Livshits V.N., Smolyak S.A. Otsenka effektivnosti investitsionnykh proektov: teoriya i praktika [Evaluating the efficiency of investment projects: theory and practice]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2008, 160 p.
  31. Livshits V.N. Optimizatsiya pri perspektivnom planirovanii i proektirovanii [Optimization with advance planning and design]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 1984, 224 p.
  32. Pikovskii A.A., Tatarin V.A. Tekhniko-ekonomicheskie raschety v energetike v usloviyakh neopredelennosti [Technical and economic assessments in the power engineering sector under uncertainty]. Leningrad, LSU Publ., 1981, 196 p.
  33. Gnedenko B.V. Kurs teorii veroyatnostei [The course of the probability theory]. Moscow, Fizmatgiz Publ., 1961, 408 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive