+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Benchmarking of the regional innovation infrastructure

Vol. 11, Iss. 22, JUNE 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Available online: 16 June 2015

Subject Heading: INNOVATION AND INVESTMENT

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 13-27

Rastvortseva S.N. Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod, Russian Federation
Rastvortseva@bsu.edu.ru

Larionova M.V. Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod, Russian Federation
larionowa-marisha@yandex.ru

Importance The article unveils the concept of innovation infrastructure, determines the role it plays in the regions' economic development. To identify the most appropriate measures of the innovation policies in the regions, we propose benchmarking, investigate the notion of the benchmarking procedure and outline an algorithm for conducting it. Drawing upon three databases of the Russian regions' development, we analyze the innovation infrastructure of the regions located in the Central Federal District of the Russian Federation.
     Objectives The research pursues building an effective system of the regions' innovative development monitoring based on benchmarking techniques. The techniques allow for using expertise of the advanced regions in order to formulate the innovative vector of the regional economic strategies.
     Methods The article describes the algorithm for benchmarking of the innovative development that was tested in the regions of the Central Federal District. The algorithm defines databases, analyzes trends in innovative infrastructure facilities of the regions per main groups of organizations, identifies the most active regions in terms of innovations, reviews the legislative framework of the regions, and articulates the recommendations on the ways to improve the innovative development process.
     Results We set up the algorithm for benchmarking procedure that helps evaluate the region's innovative development. We figure out that Moscow, Moscow region, Voronezh region, Kaluga region and Belgorod region implement innovation in the most active way. There is demand for innovative and technological centers, technological parks and business incubators in the regions. Most legislative regulations that the innovative-driven regions release focus on small business development.
     Conclusions and Relevance It is reasonable for Russia to set up the single system for monitoring the regions' innovative development that would respond to any changes in the regional laws on an ongoing basis, cover the current activities aimed to stimulate implementation of innovation, identify and recommend the most effective measures of the regional innovative policies. The benchmarking procedure scheme we propose may become the basis for such a mechanism. The outcome of the research may be helpful in developing strategies for socio-economic development of the regions in terms of the innovative infrastructure improvement.

Keywords: regional innovation system, infrastructure, region, benchmarking, technological park, business incubator, innovative and technological center, venture fund, association, consulting

References:

  1. V Voronezhe otkryt pervyi v Rossii biznes-inkubator ‘Aviatsionnyi’ [The first Russian business incubator ‘Aviatsionnyi’ was opened in Voronezh]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.) (accessed 15.06.2007)
  2. Voronezhskie vuzy smogut zarabatyvat' na innovatsionnykh proektakh [Voronezh-based universities will be able to earn from innovative projects]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.) (accessed 24.08.2007)
  3. Ivanchenko O.G., Grigor'eva A.N. Vliyanie izmenenii zakonodatel'stva o bukhgalterskom uchete na finansovyi analiz i otsenku ekonomicheskogo polozheniya nefinansovykh predpriyatii [The effect of amendments to the accounting legislation on financial analysis and evaluation of the economic position of non-financial institutions]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  4. Informatsionnaya infrastruktura [Information infrastructure]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  5. Mikheenko O.V. Innovatsionnaya infrastruktura kak opredelyayushchii faktor formirovaniya blagopriyatnoi innovatsionnoi sredy regiona (na primere Bryanskoi oblasti) [Innovation infrastructure as a factor creating the favorable innovative environment in the region (the case study of the Bryansk region)]. Natsional'naya bezopasnost' i strategicheskoe planirovanie = National Security and Strategic Planning, 2014, no. 3, pp. 26–31.
  6. Moiseenko A.A. Formirovanie innovatsionnoi infrastruktury gorodskoi aglomeratsii (na primere Rostovskoi aglomeratsii) [Building the innovation infrastructure of the urban agglomeration (the case study of the Rostov-on-Don agglomeration)]. Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaistvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel'stvo; pravo i upravlenie = Science and Education: Economy and Economics, Entrepreneurship, Law and Management, 2014, no. 6, pp. 37–42.
  7. Moskovkin V.M., Krymskii I.A. Benchmarking rossiiskoi regional'noi innovatsionnoi infrastruktury [Benchmarking of the Russian regional innovation infrastructure]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2008, no. 4, pp. 2–9.
  8. Ponyatie innovatsionnoi infrastruktury [The innovation infrastructure concept]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  9. Rastvortseva S.N. Benchmarking innovatsionnogo razvitiya v sisteme upravleniya regional'noi effektivnost'yu [Benchmarking of the innovative development as part of the regional performance management]. Ekonomika i menedzhment = Economy and Management, 2011, no. 1, pp. 103–113.
  10. Acs Z.I., Audretsch D.B., Feldman M.P. Real Effects of Academic Research: Comment. American Economic Review, 1992, no. 82 (1), pp. 363–367.
  11. Borsi B., Papanek G., Mensink W. The ProAct Benchmarking Framework: a Method Proposed to Explore Good Practices in Regional Innovation and Research Policy. Budapest, ProAct consortium, 2007, 51 p.
  12. Dosi G. Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 1988, no. 26 (3), pp. 1120–1171.
  13. Florida R., Kenney M. Venture Capital-financed Innovation and Technological Change in the USA. Research Policy, 1988, vol. 17, iss. 3, pp. 119–137.
  14. Karlsson Ch. Product Development, Innovation Networks, Infrastructure and Agglomeration Economies. The Annals of Regional Science, 1997, vol. 31, iss. 3, pp. 235–258.
  15. Maillat D. SMEs, Innovation and Territorial Development. The Spatial Context of Technological Development. Aldershot, Avebury, 1990, pp. 331–352.
  16. Malecki E. Technological Innovation and Paths to Regional Economic Growth. In Growth Policy in the Age of High Technology: The Role of Regions and States. Ed. by J. Schmandt and R. Wilson. Boston, Unwin Hyman, 1990, pp. 97–119.
  17. Markusen A., Hall P., Glasmeier A. High Tech America: The What, How, Where and Why of Sunrise Industries. Boston, Allen and Unwin, 1986.
  18. Porter M.E. The Economic Performance of Regions. Regional Studies, 2003, vol. 37, no. 6-7, pp. 549–578.
  19. Scott A.I. New Industrial Spaces. London, Pion, 1988.
  20. Scott A.I., Storper M. Work Organization and Local Labor Markets in an Era of Flexible Production. International Labour Review, 1990, no. 129 (5), pp. 573–591.
  21. Strakova L. Benchmarking Regional Knowledge Demand and Supply in Emerging Knowledge Regions: A Study across Four European Regions. Regional Studies Association Annual International Conference – Regions: The Dilemmas of Integration and Competition? Prague, 2008, 22 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive