+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Formation of the fiscal system to stimulate innovation in adapting international experience

Vol. 11, Iss. 9, MARCH 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Available online: 1 March 2015

Subject Heading: INNOVATION AND INVESTMENT

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 40-51

Ushakova S.E. Russian Scientific Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (RIEPP), Moscow, Russian Federation
SvetlanaUsh804@yandex.ru

Importance The article considers the problem of an effective fiscal system to foster innovations in Russia on the basis of application of the European countries' experience.
     Objectives The paper makes a comparative analysis of an innovation activity of the Russian enterprises and enterprises of the countries, which are in the list of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The article provides data on the structure of financing research and development according to the patent activity level of enterprises in Russia and abroad.
     Methods A comparative analysis leads to the conclusion that in order to create an enabling legal and economic environment aimed at enhancing an innovative activity of the national enterprises, it is necessary to improve legislation in the field of patenting and patent protection, as well as to introduce additional measures for fiscal stimulus of an innovation activity. I discuss the international experience of tax incentives for innovation and patent activities of enterprises, and also engaging in economic turnover of the results of intellectual activity as a case study of the mechanism of the "Patent box" preferential tax treatment. The essence of this tax regime is to levy a tax on only a fraction of revenue derived by an enterprise from the use of qualified intellectual property assets.
     Results The paper considers the feasibility of using of the indicated preferential tax treatment for the national enterprises to foster their innovative activity. I conclude that the European countries' experience for introducing the "Patent box" preferential tax treatment may be useful for the Russian economic recovery. However, while using this preferential tax treatment, it is necessary to take into account the existing economic and legal environment for functioning of the Russian enterprises. It is necessary to adapt the considered tax regime, or some of its elements.
     Conclusions and Relevance Introduction of the "Patent box" preferential tax treatment may require a restructuring of the entire system of corporate taxation of an enterprise, or any of its part in order to avoid a significant decline in tax revenues to the country's State budget.

Keywords: Keywords: enterprises, innovation activities, intellectual property, results, patents, tax incentives

References:

  1. Bashkatova A. Rossiiskaya model' innovatsii terpit krakh [The Russian innovation model collapses]. Nezavisimaya Gazeta, September 27, 2013. (In Russ.) Available at: Link.
  2. Borisov A.B. Bol'shoi ekonomicheskii slovar' [Large Dictionary of Economics]. Moscow, Knizhnyi mir Publ., 2003, 895 p.
  3. Gorbatova A., Polyakova N. Intellektual'nyi rost. STRF.ru Nauka i Tekhnologii Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Intellectual growth. STRF.ru Science and Technology of the Russian Federation]. (In Russ.) Available at: Link.
  4. Gokhberg L., Kitova G., Rud' V. Nalogovaya podderzhka nauki i innovatsii: spros i effekty [Tax support for science and innovation: demand and effects]. Forsait = Foresight Russia, 2014, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 18–41.
  5. Innovatsionnyi menedzhment v Rossii: voprosy strategicheskogo upravleniya i nauchno-tekhnologicheskoi bezopasnosti [Innovation management in Russia: the issues of strategic management and science and technology security]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2004, 880 p.
  6. Innovatsionnyi put' razvitiya dlya novoi Rossii [An innovative path for the development of new Russia]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2005, 343 p.
  7. Savina O.N., Zhazhin M.A. Nalogovye l'goty po nalogu na pribyl' organizatsii: aktual'nye voprosy optimizatsii [An entity’s income tax incentives: topical issues of optimization]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya = Financial analytics: science and experience, 2014, no. 31, pp. 37–46.
  8. Ushakov E.P. Rossiiskaya ekonomicheskaya politika: problemy i perspektivy [The economic policy of Russia: problems and prospects]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National interests: priorities and security, 2013, no. 35, pp. 2–8.
  9. Ushakov E.P. Ekonomicheskaya politika vosstanovleniya ustoichivogo razvitiya rossiiskoi ekonomiki [Economic policy for recovery of the sustainable development of the Russian economy]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National interests: priorities and security, 2014, no. 30, pp. 2–13.
  10. Feoktistova T.V. Diskussionnye aspekty primeneniya nalogovykh regulyatorov innovatsionnoi deyatel'nosti v Rossii [Controversial aspects of tax regulators application of the Russian innovation activity]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National interests: priorities and security, 2014, no. 19, pp. 32–39.
  11. Shastitko A.E., Kurdin A.A., Komkova A.A. Kak zashchitit' rezul'taty intellektual'noi deyatel'nosti [How to protect the results of intellectual activities]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' = Social Sciences and Modernity, 2014, no. 2, pp. 17–33.
  12. Shvetsov A. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo. Teoriya i praktika stanovleniya v mire i v Rossii [Information society. Theory and practice of formation in the world and in Russia]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2012, 280 p.
  13. Cass M., Rippon S. UK Patent Box to be modified following discussions with Germany. 14.11.2014. Available at: Link.
  14. Houlder V. UK and Germany reach compromise over patent box tax break. Financial Times. 12.11.2014. Available at: Link.
  15. Ninth Annual. BSA Global Software 2011 Piracy Study, Business Software Alliance. Available at: Link.
  16. OECD (2013), “R and D”, in OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013: Innovation for Growth, OECD Publishing. Available at: Link.
  17. OECD (2013), “R and D tax incentives”, in OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013: Innovation for Growth, OECD Publishing. Available at: Link.
  18. OECD (2013), “Business R and D”, in OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013: Innovation for Growth, OECD Publishing. Available at: Link.
  19. Merrill P.R., Shanahan J.R.Jr., Gomez J.E.T., Glon G., Grocott P., Lamers A., MacDougall D., Macovei A., Montredon R., Vanwelkenhuyzen Th., Cernat A., Merriman S., Moore R., Muresan G., Van Den Berghe P., Linczer A. Is It Time for the United States to Consider the Patent Box? Tax Notes, March 26, 2012.
  20. Winning A. The Research & Innovation Performance of the G20 And its Impact on Decisions Made by the World’s Most Influential Economic Leaders. Thomson Reuters, March, 2014.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive