Importance Currently, the development of the Russian new economic doctrine, which is based on the non-resource (intellectual, innovative) factors of development, represents relevant and significant scientific and practical task. Objectives The article considers the problem of identification of the capacity and directions of the domestic economy development by means of increasing productivity, and provides performance level evaluation. Based on this goal, the research subject includes organizational and economic relations, which are organized in the process of productivity growth in the national economy, including the functional content of process, its diagnosis and evaluation instruments. Methods The research methodology is based on the cognitive capabilities of the results of political economy, evolutionary and institutional economics. It enabled us to propose and substantiate the provision that in the post-industrial transformation environment a new model of economic growth should be based on the human potential development, its creativity, ideas, and it also should contribute to labor productivity growth. The research enabled to identify the main obstacles to productivity growth of the domestic economy. These obstacles include a high degree of wear and tear of fixed assets; low level of social guarantees; current model of the national economy development; lack of competition and low specification of property rights; an outdated model of manufacturing process management (excessive vertical integration of companies). Comparison with the developed raw material producing countries shows that the majority of the Russian economy sectors are based on backward industry structure and they belong to the low labor efficiency group. While performing identification of factors and mechanisms of productivity growth in the domestic economy, we have used the cognitive potential of economic development theory and functional analysis, as well as the structural and institutional analysis methods, and instrumental design. We opine that equipment and technology, labor (intellectual capital of employees), science and education serve as the priority and systems-related factors of productivity growth in the domestic economy. Results The basic theoretical findings of the research can be used to develop the labor theory, the theory of socio-economic transformations, and the theory of intellectual capital. Conclusions and Relevance The practical results may be used by the State government bodies to work out strategies of the country's socio-economic development. In conclusion, we have integrated the key findings with respect to the conducted research.
Bessonov V.A. O dinamike sovokupnoi faktornoi proizvoditel'nosti v rossiiskoi perekhodnoi ekonomike [On the dynamics of total factor productivity in the Russian transition economics]. Moscow, IEPP Publ., 2004, 66 p.
Bessonov V.A., Gimpel'son V.E., Kuz'minov Ya.I., Yasin E.G. Proizvoditel'nost' truda i faktory dolgosrochnogo razvitiya rossiiskoi ekonomiki [Labor efficiency and long-term development factors of the Russian economy]. Moscow, SU HSE Publ., 2009, 69 p.
Buraeva E.V. Primenenie klasternogo podkhoda pri izuchenii proizvoditel'nosti truda v agrarnom sektore regional'noi ekonomiki [A cluster approach in the study of labor productivity in the agricultural sector of regional economy]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2014, no. 31, pp. 32–37.
Buraeva E.V. Ispol'zovanie ekonometricheskikh metodov pri issledovanii faktorov i rezervov rosta proizvoditel'nosti truda v agrarnom sektore ekonomiki [Using econometric techniques in the study of factors and reserves of labor productivity growth in the agricultural sector]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2013, no. 38, pp. 38–48.
Gorgorova V.V., Grechko M.V. Formirovanie modeli “effektivnoi ekonomiki” Rossii v aspekte perekhoda k operezhayushchemu razvitiyu [Formation of the Russian "efficient economy" model in terms of its transition to faster growth]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' =National interests: priorities and security, 2014, no. 30, pp. 14–29.
Grechko M.V. Diagnostika sostoyaniya i perspektiv sektorov generatsii znanii ekonomiki Rossii, v kontekste perekhoda k innovatsionnoi modeli razvitiya [Diagnostics of the state and prospects of knowledge generation sectors of the Russian economy in the context of transition to the innovative development model]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' =National interests: priorities and security, 2014, no. 2, pp. 43–54.
Grechko M.V. Otsenka sostoyaniya innovatsionnogo razvitiya natsional'noi ekonomiki Rossii [Estimation of innovative development of the Russian national economy]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' =National interests: priorities and security, 2014, no. 6, pp. 29–34.
Grechko M.V. Rol' nauki v usloviyakh ekonomiki znanii: diagnostika potentsiala Rossii [The role of science in the context of the knowledge economy: the diagnostics of the Russian potential]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' =National interests: priorities and security, 2012, no. 38, pp. 14–29.
Gulyaeva T.I., Sidorenko O.V. Proizvoditel'nost' truda v zernovom podkomplekse: dinamika, metodika otsenki, faktory rosta [Labor productivity in the grain sub-complex: dynamics, estimation procedure, and growth factors]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2012, no. 41, pp. 36–43.
Zaitsev A.A. Mezhstranovoi analiz otraslevoi proizvoditel'nosti truda v 1991–2008 gg [The cross-country analysis of sectoral labor productivity in 1991–2008]. Moscow, IE RAS Publ., 2014, 44 p.
Zaitsev A.A. Regional'naya diagnostika i otraslevoi analiz proizvoditel'nosti truda [Regional diagnostics and sectoral analysis of labor productivity]. Federalizm = Federalism, 2013, no. 1, pp. 57–74.
Zarutskii S.A. Mezhregional'naya neodnorodnost' proizvoditel'nosti truda: analiz sektornoi struktury [Inter-regional heterogeneity in labor productivity: an analysis of sectoral structure]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional economics: theory and practice, 2012, no. 34, pp. 32–41.
Kondrat'ev V.B., Kurenkov Yu.V. Problemy povysheniya effektivnosti rossiiskoi ekonomiki [Problems of enhancing the Russian economy efficiency]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations, 2008, no. 12, pp. 34–43.
Kuz'bozhev E.N., Ryabtseva I.F. Praktika sistemnogo analiza problemy povysheniya proizvoditel'nosti truda [The practice of systems analysis of the problem of labor productivity increase]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2011, no. 1, pp. 17–24.
Polterovich V.M. O strategii dogonyayushchego razvitiya Rossii [On the catch-up strategy of Russian development]. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii = Economics of Contemporary Russia, 2007, no. 3, pp. 17–23.
Suvorova V.V., Timarsuev M.V. Regional'nyi aspekt analiza proizvoditel'nosti truda [Regional aspect of labor productivity analysis]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional economics: theory and practice, 2014, no. 46, pp. 56–65.
Sukharev O.S., Strizhakova E.N. Strukturnyi analiz razvitiya promyshlennoi sistemy [Structural analysis of the industrial system development]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' =National interests: priorities and security, 2014, no. 41, pp. 26–40.
Effektivnaya Rossiya: proizvoditel'nost' kak fundament rosta. Praktika menedzhmenta: issledovanie Mskinsey Global Institute [Effective Russia: work output as the growth foundation. Management practice: A McKinsey Global Institute’s Study]. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal, 2009, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 109–168.
Cabrita J., Galli da Bino C. Developments in collectively agreed working time 2012. Eurofound (European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions), 2013. Available at: Link.
World Bank. 2013. Measuring the Real Size of the World Economy: The Framework, Methodology, and Results of the International Comparison Program – ICP. Washington, DC, World Bank. doi: 10.1596 / 978-0-8213-9728-2.
