Importance In the context of accelerated technological development of enterprises of proving ground complex of industry of conventional arms and ammunition, and also the presence of organizational and managerial problems, which hamper this development, there is the need to develop a methodology of strategic portfolio of the test site, taking into account the technology dynamics. Objectives The paper provides review, analysis and inventory of existing traditional and modern approaches to performance management of proving grounds of industry, and identifies their advantages and weaknesses, as well as considers the optimal priority approach. Methods In this paper, using the scientific methods of empirical generalization, systematic and logical-linguistic approach, I analyze the works of the Russian and foreign experts on strategic management and the theory of governance structures of defense-industrial complex. I describe the most common practice of traditional approaches and the most interesting of approaches proposed by contemporary researches to strategic management of defense-industrial complex. The paper considers the possibility of their practical application at industry's test ranges. I highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, and attempt to identify the highest priority approach. I conclude that today the majority of enterprises in the procedures of practical management activities are guided by procedures, the foundation of which was laid in the 30s of the last century, in the integrated quality management system. Results The results of the work have been discussed, and have received positive feedback at the VI International Scientific and Practical Conference "The Knowledge Economy: Challenges of Managing the Formation and Development" which was held in Krasnodar in 2014. Conclusions and Relevance I substantiate the need to develop an effective methodology of test sites of strategic managements, which will contribute to achieving the strategic objectives by the complex. The paper also shows the need for special management tools, which enables to form a set of the efficient management techniques.
Burenok V.M. O podkhodakh k mobilizatsionnoi podgotovke promyshlennosti v sovremennykh usloviyakh [On approaches to mobilization training industry in the current context]. Vooruzhenie i ekonomika =Armament and economics,2011, no. 21, pp. 5–8.
Burenok V.M., Vikulov S.F. Voenno-ekonomicheskaya nauka i podgotovka kadrov v sovremennykh usloviyakh [Military and economic science and personnel training in today’s conditions]. Vooruzhenie i ekonomika = Armament and economics,2014, no. 4, pp. 5–11.
Zhukov G.P., Vikulov S.F. Voenno-ekonomicheskii analiz i issledovanie operatsii [A military-economic analysis and operations research]. Moscow, Voenizdat Publ., 1987, 440 p.
Kovalenko A.T., Bat'kovskii M.A., Khrustalev E.Yu. Metodologicheskie osnovy ekonomicheskogo otsenivaniya voennogo potentsiala gosudarstva [Methodological foundations of economic assessment of the State military potential]. Problemy prognozirovaniya =Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2005, no. 3, pp. 134–148.
Kompleksnaya sistema upravleniya kachestvom raboty [A comprehensive system for work quality management]. Krasnoarmeisk, Institut Geodeziya Publ., 1980, 259 p.
Morozov V.P., Tikhomirov V.P., Khrustalev E.Yu. Giperteksty v ekonomike: informatsionnaya tekhnologiya modelirovaniya [Hypertexts in economics: the information modeling technology]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 1997, 256 p.
Pospelov D.A. Situatsionnoe upravlenie: teoriya i praktika [Case management: theory and practice]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1986, 288 p.
Pokhvoshchev V.A., Sergeeva N.V., Ermakova E.E. Vuz i rabotodatel' – partnery po biznes-obrazovaniyu [University and the employer: partners in business education]. MIR (Modernizatsiya. Investitsii. Razvitie) = MID (Modernization. Investment. Development), 2012, no. 11, pp. 10–14.
Repin V.V., Eliferov V.G. Protsessnyi podkhod k upravleniyu. Modelirovanie biznes-protsessov [A process approach to management. Business process modeling]. Moscow, RIA Standarty i kachestvo Publ., 2008, 408 p.
Sarkisov A.S. Ekonomicheskie osnovy strategicheskogo upravleniya na predpriyatiyakh neftegazovoi promyshlennosti [Economic basis of strategic management at the oil and gas industry enterprises]. Moscow, Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas Publ., 2003, 335 p.
Sidorin A.V., Sidorin V.V. [A systemic approach to the personnel training for the military-industrial complex enterprises]. Naukovedenie, 2013, no. 1. (In Russ.) Available at: http:// naukovedenie.ru/PDF/35tvn113.pdf.
Teoreticheskie osnovy sistemnogo analiza [Theoretical foundations of a system analysis]. Moscow, SINTEG Publ., 2005, 592 p.
Kholod L.L., Khrustalev E.Yu. Metody i instrumentarii protsessnogo podkhoda [Methods and tools of a process approach]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie = Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 2007, no. 4, pp. 126–135.
Khorvat P. Sbalansirovannaya sistema pokazatelei kak sredstvo upravleniya predpriyatiem [The Balanced Scorecard as a means of an enterprise management]. Tekhnologii korporativnogo upravleniya = Technology of corporate governance. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
Khrustalev E.Yu. Kognitivnye modeli strategicheskogo upravleniya oboronno-promyshlennym kompleksom [Cognitive models of strategic management of the defense-industrial complex]. Vooruzhenie i ekonomika =Armament and economics,2011, no. 1, pp. 105–120.
Khrustalev E.Yu. Ekonomicheskie problemy voennoi bezopasnosti [Economic problems of the military security]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2005, 427 p.
Andrews K. The Concept of Corporate Strategic. Homewood, 1987.
Ansoff I. Strategic Management. London, 1984.
Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. The Balanced Scorecard – Measures then drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 1992, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 71–79.
Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System. Harvard Business Review, 1996, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 75–85.