+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Modeling the risk management system in power-generating sector companies

Vol. 11, Iss. 5, FEBRUARY 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Available online: 1 February 2015

Subject Heading: STRATEGY OF ECONOMIC ADVANCEMENT

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 10-22

Goremykina G.I. Moscow State University of Economics, Statistics and Informatics, Moscow, Russian Federation
g_iv.05@mail.ru

Mastyaeva I.N. Moscow State University of Economics, Statistics and Informatics, Moscow, Russian Federation
imastyaeva@mesi.ru

Fedorchuk A.A. Autonomous Non-commercial Organization UFL Organizing Committee, Moscow, Russian Federation
anna.fedorchuk.86@mail.ru

Importance The target-oriented and forecasting fuel and energy balance of Russia for the period until 2035 presumes advanced development of the electric-power industry for the realization of large-scale electrification of the national economy with the growth of installed power in power plants by more than 1/3 times increase and 1.6 times increase of generation of electricity. The change of functioning conditions directly impacts each electric-power industry facility. Because of this, at present, Russia is experiencing reforming of electric-power industry: of wholesale market liberalization of electric energy, implementation of the energy-saving and energy-efficiency programs, changing of tariff regulation and creation of wholesale market of power capacities. As a result, the organizations need new tools and technologies for transforming regulation market into competition market. A competition market is characterized by decision-making under condition of uncertainty. As a result, there is a need of forecasting of potential loses, and it means creating risk-management system.
     Objectives The aim of this research is the development of risk estimation model of electric energy company for constructing optimal strategy for market behavior. For achieving this goal, there were some tasks which were set up and solved, namely: different approaches to modeling risk-management system depending on quantity and quality of input data have been analyzed and compared; fuzzy-logic model of risk-management system of an electric-power company based upon key indicators and developed modeling of its parameters.
     Methods In this research, we have developed fuzzy-modeling methodology of evaluation and risks management of an electric-power company.
     Results We have constructed a model of risk management system. In the proposed model, we have used the Mamdani-Type Fuzzy Inference according to expert fuzzy knowledge basis. The development process of the system is implemented in MatLab environment using the Fuzzy Logic Toolbox package. The paper offered practical recommendations concerning construction methods of the mentioned system, and also carried out its parameters modeling.
     Conclusions and Relevance The practical significance of the research lies in the opportunity of applying the developed system as universal tool for assessing risks and creating a set of measures to minimize it.

Keywords: risk, key risk indicators, risk assessment, probabilistic models, fuzzy technology

References:

  1. Bǘhl A., Zǘfel P. SPSS: iskusstvo obrabotki informatsii. Analiz statisticheskikh dannykh i vosstanovlenie skrytykh zakonomernostei [SPSS Version 10. Einföhrung in die moderne Datenanalyse unter Windows]. St. Petersburg, DiaSoftYuP Publ., 2005, 608 p.
  2. Goremykina G.I. Ekonomiko-matematicheskoe modelirovanie sistem upravleniya na osnove nechetkoi tekhnologii: monografiya [An economic-mathematical model of control systems based on the fuzzy technology: a monograph]. Moscow, MESI Publ., 2014, 138 p.
  3. Dmitrievskaya N.A. Mezhstranovoi analiz kriteriev uyazvimosti i ustoichivosti razvitiya [A cross-country analysis of vulnerability criteria and sustainability]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National interests: priorities and security, 2014, no. 1, pp. 34–38.
  4. Dubrov A.M. Mnogomernye statisticheskie metody [Multivariate statistical methods]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 2011, 352 p.
  5. Leonenkov A.A. Nechetkoe modelirovanie v srede MatLab i fuzzyTECH [Fuzzy modeling in MatLab and fuzzyTECH environment]. St. Petersburg, BKhV-Petersburg Publ., 2003, 716 p.
  6. Lyubetskii V.A. Otsenki i puchki. O nekotorykh voprosakh nestandartnogo analiza [Valuations and bundles. On some issues of non-standard analysis]. Uspekhi matematicheskikh nauk = Advances in Mathematics, 1989, vol. 44, iss. 4, pp. 99–153.
  7. Mastyaeva I.N. Model' opredeleniya "yadra" integrirovannoi proizvodstvennoi struktury [Definition of the core model of an integrated production structure]. Obozrenie promyshlennoi matematiki = Review of Industrial Mathematics, 2007, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1121–1123.
  8. Morozov V.P. Giperteksty v ekonomike [Hypertexts in the economy]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 1997, 253 p.
  9. Pegat A. Nechetkoe modelirovanie i upravlenie [Fuzzy modeling and control]. Moscow, BINOM. Laboratoriya znanii Publ., 2009, 798 p.
  10. Rotshtein A.P. Intellektual'nye tekhnologii identifikatsii: nechetkaya logika, geneticheskie algoritmy, neironnye seti [Intelligent identification technologies: fuzzy logic, genetic algorithms, and neural networks]. Vinnitsa, UNIVERSUM–Vinnitsa Publ., 1999, 320 p.
  11. Khrustalev E.Yu. Logiko-lingvisticheskie modeli naukoemkogo proizvodstvennogo kompleksa kak raznovidnost' intellektual'nykh informatsionnykh sistem [Logical-linguistic models of high-tech manufacturing complex as a variation of intelligent information systems]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2014, no. 11, pp. 11–22.
  12. Khrustalev E.Yu. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie osnovy gipertekstovoi tekhnologii modelirovaniya ekonomicheskikh sistem [Methodological and theoretical foundations of the hypertext technology for economic systems modeling]. Kontseptsii = Concepts, 2010, no. 1-2, pp. 40–50.
  13. Khrustalev E.Yu. Semanticheskoe modelirovanie kak metod proizvodstva, sistematizatsii i ispol'zovaniya znanii ob oboronnom potentsiale gosudarstva [Semantic modeling as a method of production, systematization and use of knowledge about the State defense capabilities]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National interests: priorities and security, 2012, no. 9, pp. 2–15.
  14. Khrustalev E.Yu., Khrustalev O.E. Kognitivnoe modelirovanie razvitiya naukoemkoi promyshlennosti (na primere oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa) [Cognitive modeling of the development of knowledge-based industries (a defense industry case)]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2013, no. 10, pp. 2–10.
  15. Fedorchuk A.A. Modeliruemye i nemodeliruemye riski energeticheskoi kompanii [Simulated and non-simulated risks of the energy company]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National interests: priorities and security, 2012, no. 4, pp. 42–47.
  16. Fedorchuk A.A. Metodika otsenki urovnya tolerantnosti i ranzhirovaniya riskov kompanii [Evaluation technique for the level of tolerance and company’s risk ranking]. Nadezhnost' i bezopasnost' energetiki = Reliability and energy security, 2012, no. 2, pp. 31–35.
  17. Shtovba S.D. Proektirovanie nechetkikh sistem sredstvami MatLab [Designing fuzzy systems by means of the MatLab system]. Moscow, Goryachaya liniya – Telekom Publ., 2007, 288 p.
  18. Yarushkina N.G. Osnovy teorii nechetkikh i gibridnykh sistem [Fundamentals of the theory of fuzzy and hybrid systems]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 2004, 320 p.
  19. Kosko B. Fuzzy Systems as Universal Approximators. IEEE Trans. on Computers, 1994, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 1329–1333.
  20. Parmenter D. Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing and Using Winning KPI's. New Jersey, USA, John Wiley & Sons, inc., 2007.
  21. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inform. Contr., 1965, vol. 8, pp. 338–353.
  22. Zadeh L.A. Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet, 1973, no. 3, pp. 28–44.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive