Troshin D.V.Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation giopup2@yandex.ru
Importance Despite the made efforts, the transition to the Russian innovation economy is dragging out. The main emphasis of the State innovation policy is made on the formation of institutions and development of fiscal measures. Social and cultural factors are considered insufficiently. All this leads to low efficiency of innovation policy. To solve the problem, I propose to establish and implement a State innovation meta-project. Objectives The article substantiates the viability of the use of a meta-project as an instrument for consolidating the efforts of economic agents to solve the innovation development problems taking into account the specifics of the formation of inner motivation of innovation projects' participants. Methods The research is based on the system analysis using the provisions of the methodology of strategic planning, axiology and behaviorism. Innovation passivity is determined by the conservatism of economic agents and prevailing focus on simple acquisition, rather than meticulous creation in economic activities. On the one hand, top management, being the main driver of innovation, does not demonstrate sufficient interest; on the other hand, the staff itself resists changes. This situation is caused by the loss of the meaning of activity in the current socio-economic realities, which stems from the Russian tradition at a metaphysical level. The national economics is more encouraged by major breakthrough projects, which drastically transform the reality. At the same time, leadership assumes a prominent place. Simultaneously, the need to reduce the technological gap and to protect environment dictates concentration of efforts on creating objectively useful public goods. The conjunction of cultural and social factors and strategic economic objectives lead to the feasibility of consolidation of creative and other resources of the country under the State innovation meta-project implemented through the State order in the form of a system of contracts. Its mandatory part encompasses communication technologies to form the public system of meanings and values, which correspond to creation and reasonable consumption. Results The meta-project will enable stimulating the creation of necessary innovation that will generate the social innovation environment. Conclusions and Relevance The meta-project should be promoted as a reasonable supplement to and possible stimulation of entrepreneurship. It should not suppress private initiative.
Zakharov V.Ya. [The strategy of technological upgrading and communication]. Ekonomicheskii rost i konkurentosposobnost' Rossii: tendentsii, problemy i strategicheskie prioritety: sbornik tezisov po materialam mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii VZFEI 24–25 aprelya 2012 g [Proc. Int. Sci. Conf. “Economic growth and competitiveness of Russia: trends, challenges and strategic priorities”. In: collection of abstracts on conference materials, All-Russian Correspondence Financial and Economic Institute (VZFEI), April 24–25, 2012]. Moscow, Financial University Publ., 2013, 448 p.
Kleiner G.B. Strategiya predpriyatiya [The strategy of an enterprise]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2008, 568 p.
Matyushok S.V., Fomina A.V., Khrustalev E.Yu. Proektnyi podkhod kak metod povysheniya ekonomicheskoi effektivnosti naukoemkikh promyshlennykh predpriyatii [Project approach as a method of improving the economic efficiency of high-tech industrial enterprises]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika – Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2014, no. 34, pp. 2–16.
Neshitoi A.S. Otsenka promyshlennogo potentsiala Rossii i urovnya ego ispol'zovaniya (imperativ modernizatsii promyshlennogo proizvodstva) [Evaluation of the industrial potential of Russia and its level of use (the imperative of modernization of industrial production)]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' – National interests: priorities and security, 2014, no. 29, pp. 14–34.
Neshitoi A.S. Evolyutsiya smeny ekonomicheskoi sistemy Rossii [The evolution of changing of the Russian economic system]. Investitsii v Rossii – Investments in Russia, 2012, no. 3–4, pp. 3–9.
North D.C. Instituty, institutsional'nye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance]. Moscow, Fond ekonomicheskoi knigi “Nachala” Publ., 1997, 180 p.
Petrovskii A.B., Tikhonov I.P. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya, orientirovannye na prakticheskii rezul'tat: podkhody k otsenke effektivnosti [Fundamental studies focused on practical results: approaches to assessing effectiveness]. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk – Bulletin of RAS, 2009, vol. 79, no. 11, pp. 1006–1011.
Petsko A. Mirovye prioritety russkogo naroda [Global priorities of the Russian people]. Moscow, Institute of Russian Civilization Publ., 2013, 560 p.
Prigozhin A.I. Metody razvitiya organizatsii [Methods of development of organizations]. Moscow, MCFED Publ., 2003, 863 p.
Sukharev O.S., Neshitoi A.S. Ekonomicheskii mif korrektsii Strategii-2020 i logika strategii innovatsionnogo razvitiya Rossii [Economic myth of correction 2020-Strategy and the logic of the strategy of innovative development of Russia]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika – Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2011, no. 24, pp. 2–14.
Sukharev O.S. Psikhologicheskie faktory v analize innovatsionnogo povedeniya i ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [The psychological factors in the analysis of innovative behavior and economic development]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika – Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2013, no. 11, pp. 2–11.
Sukharev O.S. Problemy razrabotki programmy modernizatsii ekonomiki i investitsii v promyshlennosti [Problems of the development of the economy modernization program and industry investments]. Investitsii v Rossii – Investments in Russia, 2010, no. 3, pp. 41–46.
Sukharev O.S. Ekonomicheskaya politika reindustrializatsii Rossii: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya [The economic policy of the Russian reindustrialization: possibilities and limitations]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' – National interests: priorities and security, 2013, no. 24, pp. 2–24.
Sukharev O.S., Logvinov S.A. Upravlenie strukturnymi izmeneniyami ekonomiki [Managing the economy’s structural changes]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2013, 352 p.
Khainish S.V., Tokareva N.Yu. Upravlenie izmeneniyami i mekhanizmy aktivnogo razvitiya na predpriyatii [Managing changes and mechanisms of active development at an enterprise]. Moscow, International Research Institute for Management Problems Publ., 2011, 328 p.
Khrustalev E.Yu., Slavyanov A.S. Problemy formirovaniya investitsionnoi strategii innovatsionno orientirovannogo ekonomicheskogo rosta [Problems of building an investment strategy of the innovation-oriented economic growth]. Problemy prognozirovaniya – Problems of forecasting, 2011, no. 3, pp. 19–30.
Khrustalev E.Yu., Larin S.N. Regional'nye prioritety v razvitii innovatsionnoi infrastruktury [Regional priorities in developing the innovation infrastructure]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' – National interests: priorities and security, 2011, no. 42, pp. 8–15.
Khrustalev E.Yu., Khrustalev Yu.E. Ekonomiko-matematicheskii instrumentarii innovatsionnogo upravleniya naukoemkimi proizvodstvami [Economic-mathematical tools of innovation management of knowledge-intensive production]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika – Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2014, no. 16, pp. 2–13.
Jung C.G. O psikhologii vostochnykh religii i filosofii [Zur Psychologie westlicher und östlicher Religion]. Moscow, Medium Publ., 1994, 258 p.
