+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Conceptual transformation of the paradigm of sustainable development of agriculture

Vol. 10, Iss. 44, NOVEMBER 2014

Available online: 29 November 2014

Subject Heading: PROBLEM. RESEARCH. SOLUTION

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 52-62

Pshikhachev S.M. Institute of Economics of Kabardino-Balkaria State Agrarian University named after V.M. Kokov, Nalchik, Kabardino-Balkar Republic, Russian Federation
safkbr@mail.ru

The article considers the conceptual foundations of a new paradigm of sustainable development. The author demonstrates that the sustainable development paradigm is designed to reverse the negative trends and processes, which are specific to the agricultural economy, and in each specific case, it has its own set of components, which are conditioned by the specific level of economic and social development of a region, by potential possibilities and the interests of society. The paper considers the essential differences of such concepts as economic growt and sustainable development, taking into account the historical experience of the economic activity in domestic and foreign agriculture. The author evaluates the US agricultural federal programs, the experience of which, at the present time, assumes its urgency for our country. In the context of the effectively used US federal and local environmental programs, the author came to a conclusion that in the near future, Russia will require the agricultural industry transition to sustainable development thrust. This must be done both by the further development and implementation of national and regional programs through an active public-private partnership and by the State support as the priority of genuine agrarian protectionism. The research demonstrates that, in order to restore and improve soil fertility, as the national patrimony of Russia, the State support is necessary both for subsiding part of expenses of agricultural producers to purchase chemicals, and for such activities as liming of acid soils, gypsuming of alkaline soils, as well as the use of scientifically substantiated volumes of organic fertilizers. The paper rationalizes the possibilities and perspectives for the transition from intensive technology-related system of agriculture to the ecologically balanced one. The author identifies the role of agriculture in promoting biodiversity in terms of maintaining the ecological balance between individual elements of agro-ecosystems.

Keywords: agro-ecosystem, sustainable development, bio diversification, alternative farming, paradigm, innovative agricultural technologies, ecological, economic, agrarian reform

References:

  1. Abalkin L.I. Ekonomicheskaya politika i ee otvetstvennost' za razvitie nauki (metodologicheskie razmyshleniya) [Economic policy and its responsibility for the advancement of science (methodological reflections)]. Ekonomist – Economist, 2004, no. 5, pp. 3–4.
  2. Globalizatsiya i ekonomicheskii rost [Globalization and economic growth]. Ekonomika sel'skogo khozyaistva Rossii – Economics of Russian agriculture, 2002, no. 11, pp. 36–37.
  3. Danilov-Danil'yan V.I., Losev K.S. Ekologicheskii vyzov i ustoichivoe razvitie [An environmental challenge and the sustainable development]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2000, 416 p.
  4. Report on the status and use of agricultural land – 2011. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  5. Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. Т. 25, Ch. II [Gesammelte Werke, vol. 25, part 2]. Moscow, GIPL Publ., 1961–1962, 554 p.
  6. Nikonov A.A. Spiral' mnogovekovoi dramy: agrarnaya nauka i politika Rossii (XVIII–XX vv.) [The spiral of the centuries-old drama: agricultural science and the policies of Russia (18th–20th centuries)]. Moscow, VIAPI Publ., 1995, 437 p.
  7. Obespechenie ustoichivogo razvitiya sel'skokhozyaistvennogo proizvodstva i bor'ba s zasukhoi: doklad na sessii VASKhNIL [Ensuring the sustainable development of agricultural production and drought control: report of the session of the All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciences (VASKhNIL)]. Moscow, Agropromizdat Publ., 1988, 21 p.
  8. Pavlova G. Strane nuzhna novaya agrarnaya politika [The country needs a new agricultural policy]. Ekonomist – Economist, 2004, no. 4, p. 83.
  9. Pshikhachev S.M. Sel'skoe khozyaistvo SShA: osnovnye tendentsii razvitiya i ekologo-ekonomicheskaya ustoichivost' otrasli [The USA agriculture: the basic development trends and ecological and economic sustainability of the industry]. Moscow, VIAPI Publ., 2011, 442 p.
  10. Sazhina M.A. Ekonomicheskii olimp. Ocherki o Nobelevskikh laureatakh po ekonomike [The economic Olympus. Essays about the Nobel Prize winners in economics]. Moscow, Delovaya literatura Publ., 2007, 208 p.
  11. Statisticheskii obzor. Sel'skoe khozyaistvo Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 2006–2011 gg [A statistical review. The Russian Federation agriculture in 2006–2011]. Ekonomika sel'skogo khozyaistva Rossii – Economics of Russian agriculture, 2012, no. 9, pp. 77–86.
  12. Soils and Men. Yearbook of Agriculture. 1938. Available at: Link.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive