Innovative educational technology: the SIFO project as the concept of alternative organization and educational and industrial practices in higher education institutions of Russia
Kanchukoev V.O.Kabardino-Balkaria State Agrarian University named after V.M. Kokov, Nalchik, Kabardino-Balkar Republic, Russian Federation kvo1952@mail.ru
Importance The article indicates the need for the education system, conditional upon the needs of the modern knowledge economy development. On the one hand, the innovation development of sectors urgently requires careful preparation of corresponding specialists, on the other hand, the main dominants of the national institute of education determines the socially oriented vector. The required change in the education system should be carried out with high efficiency and within a short time, using all the available reserves and opportunities. Objectives I am analyzing the current problems in technology and methodological foundations of educational and production processes in the Russian institutions of higher education, and my paper outlines the ways to solve the specified problems. Methods In particular, I propose to use the developed SIFO project, which implements the concept of alternative innovation and breakthrough organization of practical training of highly qualified personnel (bachelors, specialists, masters and postgraduate students) using the information and telecommunication technologies and remote technologies (ITTRT), and methodological and methodical tools, banks of practice bases and databases (BPBD) of the special simulation firms and organizations (SIFO) - virtual business entities of the economy, organizations and institutions of government and other enterprises, which are formed by institutions and faculties of the Russian institutions of higher education. To provide additional education and production services, I proposed to use the specially designed stand-alone non-profit organizations - ñenters for additional educational and production SIFO services. Results I came to a conclusion that the innovative technologies and the overall potential embedded in the mechanism of realization of the SIFO project will allow institutions of higher education to obtain real and legitimate reasons to enhance the quality and effectiveness of additional educational and production services. Conclusions and Relevance I emphasize that it will be facilitated by obtaining the relevant monetary funds for additional alternative educational and production services to organize and conduct practices at the level of current imperative, which are based on the scientific and technological achievements of the leading global institutions of higher educations.
Vikulov S.F., Khrustalev E.Yu. Reforma sistemy voennogo obrazovaniya: sostoyanie, tendentsii, predlozheniya po uluchsheniyu [Reform of the military education system: the status, trends, and suggestions for improvement]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' – National interests: priorities and security, 2012, no. 12, pp. 9–14.
Grechko M.V. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i osnovnye dominanty razvitiya natsional'nogo instituta obrazovaniya v sotsial'no orientirovannoi ekonomike [The current status and the main development dominants of the national institution of education in socially-oriented economy]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' – National interests: priorities and security,2009, no. 16, pp. 40–48.
Grechko M.V. “Provaly obrazovaniya” kak bar'er razvitiya otechestvennoi sistemy obrazovaniya v usloviyakh innovatsionnogo ryvka [Fail of education as a barrier to the development of national systems of education in the conditions of innovative breakthrough]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' – National interests: priorities and security, 2014, no. 17, pp. 12–20.
Grechko M.V. Protivorechiya i problemy reformirovaniya otechestvennykh vuzov na etape postroeniya informatsionnogo obshchestva i ekonomiki znanii [Contradictions and problems of reforming the national higher educational establishments at the stage of setting up the information society and knowledge economy]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' – National interests: priorities and security, 2011, no. 43, pp. 15–20.
Grechko M.V., Gorgorova V.V. Formirovanie modeli “effektivnoi ekonomiki” Rossii v aspekte perekhoda k operezhayushchemu razvitiyu [Formation of the efficient economy model in Russia in terms of the transition to faster growth]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' – National interests: priorities and security, 2014, no. 30, pp. 14–29.
Dolyatovskii V.A., Grechko M.V. Mekhanizmy adaptivnogo upravleniya vuzom pri izmeneniyakh rynochnoi situatsii [Mechanisms for the adaptive management of higher educational establishments under market conditions changes]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika – Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2012, no. 13, pp. 40–45.
Druzhinina S.V. Integral'naya rezul'tativnost' ispol'zovaniya trudovykh resursov v usloviyakh innovatsionnoi ekonomiki (na primere Sankt-Peterburga, 2005–2011 gg.) [An integrated results rating of the use of labor resources in an innovation economy (the St. Petersburg case, 2005–2011)]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya – Financial analytics: science and experience, 2012, no. 27, pp. 2–6.
RF Federal Law “On Education in the Russian Federation” of December 29, 2012 ¹ 273-FZ. (In Russ.)
RF Federal Law “On Non-commercial organizations” of January 12, 1996 ¹ 7-FZ. (In Russ.)
RF Government Decree “On Licensing of educational activities” of October 28, 2013 ¹ 966. (In Russ.)
Khrustalev E.Yu., Kholod L.L. Modeli protsessov byudzhetirovaniya deyatel'nosti vysshego uchebnogo zavedeniya [Models of budgeting of the HEI activities]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika – Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2008, no. 23, pp. 2–10.
Khrustalev E.Yu., Baranova N.M. Intellektual'nye semanticheskie modeli dlya povysheniya kachestva obrazovatel'nykh i nauchno-issledovatel'skikh protsessov [Intelligent semantic models to improve the quality of educational and research processes]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika – Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2013, no. 35, pp. 2–10.
