+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ÈÄ «Ôèíàíñû è êðåäèò»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Problems of institutional environment formation of innovation sector of the Russian economy

Vol. 10, Iss. 41, NOVEMBER 2014

Available online: 1 November 2014

Subject Heading: STRATEGY OF ECONOMIC ADVANCEMENT

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 41-50

Slavyanov A.S. Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
aslavianov@mail.ru

Importance Due to the obvious need to modernize the Russian economy, the problem of reforming the institutional environment, where innovative products and technologies are created and consumed assumes particular urgency.
     Objectives As the goal of the study, I consider the determining of directions of modernization of institutional environment of the innovation sector of the national economy.
     Methods In this paper, using econometric techniques, I attempted to identify the relationship between the innovation activity of economic agents and the institutional environment corresponding to a certain time period.
     Results The analysis of international experience shows that the level of innovative development of the society does not depend on the form of the State government, level of democracy and corruption. The status of the institutional environment greatly impacts on innovation processes. Analyzing the historical experience of the development of national science and technology, I show that the maximum innovation activity of economy was observed in the period of centralized funding for science and education. The most important inventions and discoveries that were applied in the domestic economy have been made during the State control over the processes of development and introduction of new products and technologies. In the result of retrospective analysis, it was found that especially innovative processes are activated in the domestic economy in times of economic sanctions and restrictions. I demonstrate that market-based mechanisms that provide free movement of technology, knowledge, scientists and specialists have a negative impact on the national innovation system development
     Conclusions and Relevance I came to a conclusion about the need for strict control over an innovation process in large enterprises with State participation. I emphasize that for private enterprises and a company with foreign participation is meaningful to apply economic instruments and incentives that motivate them to develop innovative products and technology. In order to achieve that I consider, for example, the issues aimed at reducing taxes and interest rates.

Keywords: innovative development, institutional environment, scientific research

References:

  1. Avdonin B.N., Khrustalev E.Yu. Metodologiya organizatsionno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya naukoemkikh proizvodstv [The methodology of organizational and economic development of science-intensive industries]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2010, 368 p.
  2. Golovin N.N. Voennye usiliya Rossii v mirovoi voine [The Russian military efforts in the World War]. Paris, Tovarishchestvo ob"edinennykh izdatelei Publ., 2 volumes, 1939, vol. 1, 212 p., vol. 2, 244 p.
  3. Erznkyan B.A. Neoliberal'nye “koridory” i institutsional'nye “tonneli”. Teoriya i praktika institutsional'nykh preobrazovanii v Rossii: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Vyp. 24 [Neoliberal “corridors” and institutional “tunnels”. In: Theory and practice of institutional reforms in Russia: a collection of research papers. Iss. 24]. Moscow, Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of RAS Publ., 2012, p. 26.
  4. Kuz'min V. Dmitrii Medvedev vydelil prioritetnye otrasli innovatsionnogo razvitiya [Dmitrii Medvedev identified priority industries of innovation development]. Rossiiskaya Gazeta, 2009, June 19.
  5. Mokrshitskii E.I. Istoriya parovozostroeniya SSSR [History of the engine industry of the USSR]. Moscow, TransZhelDorIzdat Publ., 1941, 260 p.
  6. Orlov A.I. O pokazatelyakh effektivnosti nauchnoi deyatel'nosti [Indicators of scientific activities efficiency]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2014, no. 7, pp. 21–29.
  7. Decree of the RF President “On Approval of the priority directions of development of science, technologies and equipment in the Russian Federation and the list of critical technologies of the Russian Federation” of July 7, 2011 ¹ 899. (In Russ.)
  8. Polterovich V.M. Faktory korruptsii [Factors of corruption]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody Economics and mathematical methods, vol. 24, issue 1, 1998, pp. 28–34.
  9. Polterovich V.M., Popov V.V. Demokratizatsiya i ekonomicheskii rost [Democratization and economic growth]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' Social sciences and modernity, 2007, no. 2, pp. 13–27.
  10. Polterovich V.M. Institutsional'nyi eksperiment [Institutional experiment]. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii Economic science of modern Russia, 2013, no. 3, pp. 14–26.
  11. Ryzhov K. 100 velikikh izobretenii [100 great inventions]. Moscow, Veche Publ., 2006, 528 p.
  12. Saprykin D.L. “Zolotoi vek” otechestvennoi nauki i tekhniki i “klassicheskaya” kontseptsiya inzhenernogo obrazovaniya ["Golden age" of domestic science and technology and the "classical" concept of engineering education]. Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniya i tekhniki Issues of history of natural sciences and technology, 2013, no. 1, pp. 28–66.
  13. Sergushko S.V., Slavyanov A.S. Innovatsionnye metody v gosudarstvennom upravlenii [Innovation methods in public administration]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika Regional economics: theory and practice, 2012, no. 46, pp. 56–62.
  14. Slavyanov A.S. Problemy realizatsii strategii innovatsionnogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii i finansirovanie otechestvennoi nauki [Problems of realization of strategy of innovation development of the Russian Federation and national science financing]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' National interests: priorities and security, 2014, no. 12, pp. 27–35.
  15. Slavyanov A.S. Investitsionnyi potentsial innovatsionnogo razvitiya rossiiskoi ekonomiki [Investment potential of an innovation development of the Russian economy]. Finansy i kredit Finance and credit, 2011, no. 17, pp. 49–54.
  16. Fal'ko S.G. Ekonomicheskie nauki v tekhnicheskikh universitetakh Rossii [Economic sciences in the Russian technical universities]. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii Economic science of modern Russia, 2008, no. 1, pp. 215–216.
  17. Khrustalev E.Yu., Slavyanov A.S. Problemy formirovaniya investitsionnoi strategii innovatsionno-orientirovannogo ekonomicheskogo rosta [Problems of formation of investment strategy of innovation economic growth]. Problemy prognozirovaniya Problems of forecasting, 2011, no. 3, pp. 19–30.
  18. Building Submarines for Russia in Burrard Inlet. By W. Kaye Lamb. BC Studies, 1986, Autumn, no. 71, p. 104.
  19. Corruption perception index 2012. Transparency international, 2013, p. 5.
  20. Moran Jonathan. Corruption and NIC development: A case study of South Korea. Business School, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 2007, p. 28.
  21. The Global Innovation Index 2012. Stronger Innovation Linkages for Global Growth. By Soumitra Dutta. INSEAD, 2013, p. 464.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive