+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

The effectiveness of an executive: what determines it?

Vol. 10, Iss. 36, SEPTEMBER 2014

Available online: 23 September 2014

Subject Heading: PROBLEM. RESEARCH. SOLUTION

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 53-63

Zhdanov D.A. Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation
djhdanov@mail.ru

The original motive of the studies submitted in the article arises from the interest to identify the qualities by which owners of domestic companies select top managers for their business, in particular, what requirements they impose for such workers when employing them. To get the answer to the question posed, the author used the questionnaires of corporate executives, analysis of the views of shareholders of the reasons for their selection of candidates for corporate Boards of Directors. In addition, the author examined some examples of the interaction between shareholders and top heads of companies. On the basis of the received results, the paper determines that when choosing a leader for the company, the principals actually appreciate two key groups of characteristics. First, they look for the requirement for a high qualification of the candidate, and secondly, for the candidate's sufficient loyalty. At the same time, the importance (weight) of each of the factors for a particular position is taken into account in the work. The author points out that the importance of the loyalty increases for the economies of the countries on the way of emergence of developed market institutions, as it is currently running in Russia. The polls also have shown the existence of an inverse relationship between the two observed groups of qualities. In the majority of the observations it was identified that the more loyal executives were not at the same time the most qualified and vice versa. It was noted simultaneously, that a more loyal manager often demonstrates the most managerial activity, but this advantage is negated by the presence of lesser qualification and it enables to speak about the managerial problems, which appear in this connections. The results of the study enable to generate recommendations for the shareholders and other principals to reduce the agency costs by the Russian corporations by introducing the correct selection and recruitment managers. The author highlights the key factors characterizing agents capable to ensure the greatest efficiency, and which allow to get rid of the insufficiently effective leaders.

Keywords: agency, relationship, executive, head, qualification, loyalty, top managers, selection

References:

  1. Dolgopyatova T.G. [Bringing in the hired managers: the background and implications]. Opubl.: XII Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva. T. 4 [Proc. 12th Int. Sci. Conf. on the problems of development of the economy and society, vol. 4]. Moscow, SRU – HSE Publ., 2012, pp. 67–77.
  2. Zhdanov D.A., Danilov I.N. Organizatsionnaya evolyutsiya korporatsii [The organizational evolution of corporations]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2011, 268 p.
  3. A study of corporate governance practices – 2005. Association of Independent Directors. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  4. Limitovskii M.A. Reputatsiya, kvalifikatsiya i motivatsiya kak draivery tsennosti [Reputation, qualification and motivation as the drivers of value]. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta – Russian journal of management, 2009, no. 2, pp. 51–68.
  5. Rossiiskaya korporatsiya: vnutrennyaya organizatsiya, vneshnie vzaimodeistviya, perspektivy razvitiya [A Russian corporation: the internal organization, external interaction, development prospects]. Moscow, SRU – HSE Publ., 2009, 542 p.
  6. Roshchin S.Yu., Solntsev S.A. Rynok truda top-menedzherov v Rossii: mezhdu vneshnim naimom i vnutrennim prodvizheniem [The labour market of top managers in Russia: between external recruitment and internal advancement]. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta – Russian journal of management, 2005, no. 3, pp. 11–28.
  7. Shekshnya S.V. Kak eto skazat’ po-russki? Sovremennye metody upravleniya personalom v sovremennoi Rossii [Kak eto skazat' po-russki? The modern methods of human resource management in modern Russia]. Moscow, Upravlenie personalom Publ., 2003, 232 p.
  8. Shirokova G.V., et al. Faktory peredachi upravleniya naemnomu menedzheru: opyt stran SNG i Tsentral'noi i Vostochnoi Evropy [Factors of management transfer to the hired manager: the experience of the CIS and Central and Eastern European countries]. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta – Russian journal of management, 2009, no. 2, pp. 31–50.
  9. Yakovlev A.A., Danilov Yu.A., Simachev Yu.V. Global'nyi finansovyi krizis i korporativnoe upravlenie [The global financial crisis and corporate governance]. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta – Russian journal of management, 2010, no. 1, pp. 21–34.
  10. Williamson O. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. The Free Press, N.Y., 1985.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive