Based on the example of methods and approaches employed to make the modern programs of scientific and technological development in the European Union, the authors sum up the experience of program implementation and propose an effectiveness assessment tools as separate activities within the programs and the program as a whole. The underlying basis of scientific and technical policy of the EU is a package of measures aimed at scientific research, carried out within the framework programs in individual (the most promising) directions of science development. Besides of financial justification, each program is provided with calculation of the expected social-and-economic effect of its implementation. The authors opine that the similar approach is advisable to apply in our country as well, taking into account the specific environment of domestic economy development.
Gerasimova L.I., Larin S.N., Sokolov N.A. Mekhanizmy mnogokriterial’nogo otbora perspektivnykh nauchnykh issledovanii dlia ikh kommertsializatsii [Mechanisms for multicriterion selection of promising scientific research for commercial use]. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ – National interests: priorities and security, 2013, no. 21, pp. 23–33.
Ivashkov A.V. Logika razvitiia nauchno-tekhnicheskoi politiki Evropeiskogo Soiuza: realizatsiia printsipa sistemnosti v nauchno-tekhnicheskoi integratsii [The logic of science-and-technology policy development of the European Union: implementing the systematization principle in scientific and technical integration]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of Tomsk State University, 2007, no. 296.
Larin S.N., Zhilyakova E.V. Organizatsionnye struktury i integratsionnye formy nauki i biznesa kak faktor stimulirovaniia innovatsionnoi deiatel'nosti na regional'nom urovne [Organizational structures and integration forms of science and business as an innovation incentive factor at a regional level]. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ – National interests: priorities and security, 2012, no. 19, pp. 17–28.
Rudtskaia E.R., Khrustalev E.Iu., Tsyganov S.A. Metody nakopleniia nauchnogo znaniia dlia innovatsionnogo razvitiia rossiiskoi ekonomiki (opyt RFFI) [Methods of scientific knowledge accumulation for innovation-driven growth of the Russian economy (RFBR experience)]. Problemy prognozirovaniia – Problems of forecasting, 2009, no. 3.
Tikhonov I.P., Khrustalev E.Iu., Iakovlev E.N. Kommertsializatsiia rezul’tatov fundamental’nykh nauchnykh issledovanii (opyt Rossiiskogo fonda fundamental’nykh issledovanii) [Commercialization of the results of basic research (the experience of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research)]. Innovatsii – Innovation, 2007, no. 10.
Khrustalev E.Iu. Problemy organizatsii i upravleniia v naukoemkikh otrasliakh ekonomiki Rossii [Problems of organization and management in the knowledge-based economy of Russia]. Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom – Management in Russia and abroad,2001, no. 1.
Khrustalev E.Iu., Larin S.N. Ispol’zovanie informatsionnykh resursov i tekhnologii dlia stimulirovaniia innovatsionnogo razvitiia ekonomiki [Use of information resources and technologies to promote innovation-driven growth of the economy]. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ – National interests: priorities and security, 2011, no. 32.
Khrustalev E.Iu., Slavianov A.S. Problemy formirovaniia investitsionnoi strategii innovatsionno-orientirovannogo ekonomicheskogo rosta [Problems of formation of the investment strategy for innovation-driven economic growth]. Problemy prognozirovaniia – Problems of forecasting, 2011, no. 3.
Tsyganov S.A., Khrustalev E.Iu., Rudtskaya E.R. Generirovanie novykh znanii na osnove innovatsionno orientirovannykh konkursov RFFI [Generation of new knowledge based on innovative RFBR-based competition]. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ – National interests: priorities and security, 2011, no. 45.
Artis M.J. and Nixson F., Eds. The Economics of the European Union: Policy and Analysis (4-th ed.), Oxford University Press, 2007.
Bossink B. The development of coinnovation strategies: stages and interaction patterns in inter-firm innovation. R&D Management, 2010, no. 32, pp. 311–320.
Granieri M., Renda A. A New Approach to Innovation Policy in the European Union, 2010.
Grove J. Triple miracle sees huge rise in EU funds for frontier research. Times Higher Education, July 28, 2011.
Veugeler R., Cincera M. Europe’s Missing Yollies. Bruegel Policy Brief, June, 2010.
