Financial Analytics: Science and Experience
 

Abstracting and Indexing

РИНЦ
Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
Worldcat
Google Scholar

Online available

EBSCOhost
Eastview
Elibrary
Biblioclub

Archiving

Cyberleninka (12 month OA embargo)

Critique on the prevalence of fiscal efficiency evaluation in choosing investment for purposes of State co-finance

Vol. 10, Iss. 4, APRIL 2017

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 13 February 2017

Received in revised form: 20 February 2017

Accepted: 10 March 2017

Available online: 16 April 2017

Subject Heading: INNOVATION AND INVESTMENT

JEL Classification: D61, H43, O22, R53

Pages: 418-434

https://doi.org/10.24891/fa.10.4.418

Kogan A.B. Novosibirsk State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (Sibstrin), Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
kogant@mail.ru

Importance The article analyzes what issues arise in decision making on the State cofinance of investment projects at the level of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation.
Objectives The research verifies my hypothesis stating that fiscal efficiency and public efficiency of projects should not be the same. It may result in inappropriate budgetary spending, i.e. investing in programs that do not generate maximum effect for the public. I also review the relationship of fiscal efficiency and public efficiency by modeling how the project may be implemented by national and foreign investors.
Methods The cross-sectoral model is used to describe the economy of the Novosibirsk oblast. The regionally significant investment project is overviewed using data of the company in charge of the project performance. To evaluate public efficiency of investment, I apply my own method combining a cross-sectoral analysis and analysis of Discounted Cash Flows. To evaluate fiscal efficiency, I resorted to methods national regulations and guidelines offer.
Results As I found out, estimates of fiscal efficiency, public efficiency and cost efficiency did not relate.
Conclusions and Relevance Public efficiency of any project strongly depends on the investor type. It is more beneficial for the economy of any Russian region if the program is implemented by the national investor, rather than foreign one.

Keywords: fiscal efficiency, public-private partnership, project

References:

  1. Afanas'ev R.S., Golovanova N.V. [The concept of budgetary spending efficiency: theory and legislation]. Nauchno-issledovatel'skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Research Institute. Financial Journal, 2016, no. 1, pp. 61–69. (In Russ.)
  2. Strem S., Leont'eva E. Byudzhetnyi protsess kak instrument effektivnogo upravleniya [Budgeting process as an effective management tool]. Moscow, URSS, Lenand Publ., 2013, 336 p.
  3. Andreeva E.I., Gorshkova I.D., Kovalevskaya A.S. Rekomendatsii po otsenke sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoi effektivnosti sotsial'nykh programm. Opredeleniya, podkhody, prakticheskii opyt [Recommendations for Assessment of Social and Economic Efficiency of Social Programs. Definitions, Approaches, Practical Experience]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2014, 72 p.
  4. Afanas'ev M.P., Shash N.N. [Toolkit for assessing the efficiency of governmental programs]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya = Public Administration Issues, 2013, no. 3, pp. 48–69. (In Russ.)
  5. Fattakhov R.V. [A set of models to evaluate large-scale investment projects in the region]. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta = Bulletin of Financial University, 2012, no. 2, pp. 88–100. (In Russ.)
  6. Dondokov Z.B.-D., Dyrkheev K.P. [Methods to perform analytical and forecasting assessments of socio-economic development of the region through the cross-sectoral model]. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = The Buryat State University Bulletin, 2014, no. 2, pp. 37–39. (In Russ.)
  7. Sayapova A.R. [Regional and national Input–Output tables]. Problemy prognozirovaniya = Problems of Forecasting, 2008, no. 6, pp. 19–29. (In Russ.)
  8. Sayapova A.R., Slobodyanik S.N. [Russian and foreign practices of developing regional Input–Output tables]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6: Ekonomika = Moscow University Economics Bulletin, 2008, no. 6, pp. 3–11. (In Russ.)
  9. Kotova T.E. [Evaluating foreign trade effects in the economy of the Khabarovsk Krai through the Input–Output tables]. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2012, no. 1, pp. 43–68. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14530/se.2012.1.043-068
  10. Melent'ev B.V. [Forecasting financial flows through interregional cross-sectoral models]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody = Economics and Mathematical Methods, 2016, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 50–64. (In Russ.)
  11. Melent'ev B.V., Ershov Yu.S., Alimpieva A.A. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii postroeniya mezhregional'nogo mezhotraslevogo balansa ‘platezhi – dokhody’ [Methodological guidelines for setting interregional cross-sectoral balance of payments and income]. Novosibirsk, Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch of RAS Publ., 2010, 144 p.
  12. Tatarkin D.A., Sidorova E.N., Trynov A.V. [Methodological fundamentals for assessing multiplicative effects of public-interest investment projects]. Vestnik UrFU. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie = Bulletin of Ural Federal University. Series Economics and Management, 2015, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 574–587. (In Russ.)
  13. Tatarkin D.A., Sidorova E.N., Trynov A.V. [Use of the financial flow matrix to model the effect of the federal fiscal and budgetary policy on the region's economy: evidence from the Sverdlovsk oblast]. Vestnik UrFU. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie = Bulletin of Ural Federal University. Series Economics and Management, 2014, no. 6, pp. 67–76. (In Russ.)
  14. Trynov A.V. [Methods for feasibility study of investment projects implemented through the PPP model]. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region, 2016, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 602–612. (In Russ.)
  15. Granberg A.G. et al. Optimizatsionnye mezhregional'nye mezhotraslevye modeli [Interregional cross-sectoral models for optimization]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1989, 257 p.
  16. Granberg A.G., Mikheeva N.N. et al. [Experimental assessments of efficiency of investment projects through cross-sectoral interregional models]. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya = Region: Economics and Sociology, 2010, no. 4, pp. 45–72. (In Russ.)
  17. Suslov V.I. et al. Proektnaya ekonomika v usloviyakh innovatsionnogo razvitiya: kontseptsiya, modeli, mekhanizmy [Project Economy in the Conditions of Innovation Development: Concept, Models, Mechanisms]. Novosibirsk, Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch of RAS Publ., 2009, 143 p.
  18. Malov V.Yu., Melent'ev B.V., Aleshina O.V. [Comprehensive evaluation of large regional projects]. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya = Region: Economics and Sociology, 2009, no. 3, pp. 116–129. (In Russ.)
  19. Kogan A.B. [Evaluating public efficiency of investment through the cross-sectoral model of the region]. Vestnik NGUEU = Vestnik NSUEM, 2016, no. 1, pp. 123–133. (In Russ.)
  20. Kogan A.B. [Evaluating public efficiency of investment in the industrial and logistic park of the Novosibirsk oblast]. Mir ekonomiki i upravleniya = World of Economics and Management, 2016, vol. 16, iss. 1, pp. 50–60. (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8768 (Online)
ISSN 2073-4484 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 12, Iss. 3
September 2019

Archive