+7 495 989 9610, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Financial Analytics: Science and Experience
 

Prospects of controlling systems in strategic management

Vol. 10, Iss. 1, JANUARY 2017

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 22 November 2016

Received in revised form: 28 November 2016

Accepted: 12 December 2016

Available online: 17 January 2017

Subject Heading: MONITORING OF ECONOMIC PROCESSES

JEL Classification: М52, О15, Р47

Pages: 4-19

https://doi.org/10.24891/fa.10.1.4

Gavel' O.Yu. Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
olga-gavel@mail.ru

Importance The article reviews some key aspects of empirical research into controlling systems in strategic management. I examined the nexus of performance indicators, payroll systems and the business development strategy.
Objectives The research critically summarizes and systematized stances on the role and significance of controlling systems in strategic management, specifies key parameters and areas for their development. I analyze each aspect in terms of practical significance of results.
Methods The research relies upon principles of systems and comprehensive approaches. Tools include methods of analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, techniques of logic and semantic analysis.
Results I determine reasons and conditions for using controlling systems in strategic management within the turbulent economic environment. The article outlines prospects of using the controlling system to manage major companies and ensure timely undertakings and their controllable nature at various business levels. If the progressive system of motivation is implemented, it will allow incrementing and implementing investment and innovative capabilities of companies to ensure their sustainable economic growth and adjust parameters of the business model.
Conclusions and Relevance As it is necessary to perform ongoing monitoring and forecast probable scenarios of business development, priorities of using information and analytical systems change, shifting dedication to elaboration and implementation of proactive managerial activities. In this respect, controllers should use models based on a situational analysis. Decentralized asset management requires decision-makers to have common views on the business status and its goals, and flexibly coordinate their activities.

Keywords: controlling system, business analysis, strategy, turbulence, efficiency

References:

  1. Langfield-Smith K. Management Control Systems and Strategy: A Critical Review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1997, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 207–232. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(95)00040-2
  2. Langfield-Smith K., Smith D. Management Control and Trust in Outsourcing Relationships. Management Accounting Research, 2003, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 281–307. doi: Link 10.1016/S1044-5005(03)00046-5
  3. Berdnikov V.V. Kontrolling biznesa: modeli, razvitie, problemy, resheniya: monografiya [Business controlling: models, development, issues, solutions: a monograph]. Moscow, Ekonomicheskaya gazeta Publ., 2012, 488 p.
  4. Aaker D. Strategicheskoe rynochnoe upravlenie [Strategic Market Management]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2007, 496 p.
  5. Hahn D., Hungenberg H. Planirovanie i kontrol'. Stoimostno-orientirovannye kontseptsii kontrollinga [PuK. Planung und Kontrolle. Planungs- und Kontrollsysteme. Planungs- und Kontrollrechnung. Wertorientirte Controllingkonzepte]. Moscow, Finansy i Statistika Publ., 2005, 928 p.
  6. Porter M. Konkurentsiya [On Competition]. Moscow, Al'pina Biznes Buks Publ., 2009, 340 p.
  7. Shank J.K., Govindarajan V. Strategic Cost Analysis of Technological Investments. Sloan Management Review, 1992, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 39–51.
  8. Slywotzky A. Migratsiya stoimosti. Chto budet s vashim biznesom poslezavtra? [Value Migration. How to Think Several Moves Ahead of the Competition. Management of Innovation and Change]. Moscow, Ivanov, Mann, Ferber Publ., 2006, 432 p.
  9. Malina M.A., Selto F.H. Communicating and Controlling Strategy: An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of the Balanced Scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 2001, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 47–90.
  10. Olve N.-G., Petri K.-I., Roy J., Roy S. Balans mezhdu strategiei i kontrolem [Making Scorecards Actionable: Balancing Strategy and Control]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2005, 320 p.
  11. Vetluzhskikh E. Sistema voznagrazhdeniya: kak razrabotat' tseli i KPI [Remuneration system: how to set up goals and KPI]. Moscow, Al'pina Pablisher Publ., 2014, 224 p.
  12. Simons R. Accounting Control Systems and Business Strategy: An Empirical Analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1987, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 357–374. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(87)90024-9
  13. Govindarajan V., Gupta A.K. Linking Control Systems to Business Unit Strategy: Impact on Performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1985, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 51–66. doi: 10.1016/ 0361-3682(85)90031-5
  14. Govindarajan V. A Contingency Approach to Strategy Implementation at the Business-Unit Level: Integrating Administrative Mechanisms with Strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 1988, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 828–853. doi: 10.2307/256341
  15. Berdnikov V.V. [Staff controlling and its role in improving the strategic efficiency of agricultural business]. Vektor nauki Tol'yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Vector of Sciences. Togliatti State University, 2011, no. 2, pp. 143–146. (In Russ.)
  16. Berdnikov V.V. Kontrolling effektivnosti biznesa: monografiya [Business efficiency control: a monograph]. Moscow, RUDN Publ., 2009, 460 p.
  17. Kaplan R., Norton D. Sbalansirovannaya sistema pokazatelei. Ot strategii k deistviyu [The Balanced Scorecard. From Strategy to Action]. Moscow, Olimp-Biznes Publ., 2003, 304 p.
  18. Ittner C., Larcker D. Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 1998, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 205–238.
  19. Ittner C., Larcker D., Randall T. Performance Implications of Strategic Performance Measurement in Financial Services Firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2003, vol. 28, no. 7-8, pp. 715–741. doi: Link00033-3
  20. Bisbe J., Otley D. The Effects of the Interactive Use of Management Control Systems on Product Innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2004, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 709–737. doi: Link
  21. Hoque Z., James W. Linking Balanced Scorecard Measures to Size and Market Factors: Impact on Organizational Performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 2000, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–17.
  22. Eckerson W.W. Paneli indikatorov kak instrument upravleniya: klyuchevye pokazateli effektivnosti, monitoring deyatel'nosti, otsenka rezul'tatov [Performance Dashboards: Measuring, Monitoring, and Managing Your Business]. Moscow, Al'pina Biznes Buks Publ., 2007, 396 p.
  23. Ranadive V. Predvidenie: novaya evolyutsionnaya uprezhdayushchaya model' biznesa [The Power to Predict: How Real Time Businesses Anticipate Customer Needs, Create Opportunities, and Beat the Competition]. Moscow, EKSMO Publ., 2008, 240 p.
  24. Olve N.-G., Roy J., Wetter M. Otsenka effektivnosti kompanii. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo po ispol'zovaniyu sbalansirovannoi sistemy pokazatelei [Performance Drivers: A Practical Guide to Using the Balanced Scorecard]. Moscow, Vil'yams Publ., 2006, 304 p.
  25. Barilenko V.I., Berdnikov V.V., Gavel' O.Yu., Kerimova Ch.V. Analiticheskie instrumenty obosnovaniya i monitoringa effektivnosti biznes-modelei kompanii malogo i srednego biznesa: monografiya [Analytical tools to substantiate and monitor the efficiency of small and medium-sized business models: a monograph]. Moscow, Ekonomicheskaya gazeta Publ., 2014, 308 p.
  26. Barilenko V.I., Berdnikov V.V., Gavel' O.Yu., Kerimova Ch.V. Informatsionno-analiticheskie metody otsenki i monitoringa effektivnosti innovatsionnykh proektov: monografiya [Information and analytical methods to evaluate and monitor the efficiency of innovative projects: a monograph]. Moscow, RuScience Publ., 2015, 164 p.
  27. Ittner C., Larcker D., Meyer M.W. Subjectivity and the Weighting of Performance Measures: Evidence from a Balanced Scorecard. The Accounting Review, 2003, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 725–758.
  28. Efimova O.V. [Sustainability development report as a new form of corporate reporting]. Auditorskie vedomosti = Audit Journal, 2014, no. 8, pp. 36–47. (In Russ.)
  29. Hansen A., Mouritsen J. Strategies and Organizational Problems: Constructing Corporate Value and Coherence in Balanced Scorecard Processes. In: Controlling Strategy: Management, Accounting and Performance Measurement. Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 125–150.
  30. Banker R.D., Chang H., Pizzini M.J. The Balanced Scorecard: Judgmental Effects of Performance Measures Linked to Strategy. The Accounting Review, 2004, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 1–23.
  31. Merchant K.A. Rewarding Results: Motivating Profit Center Managers. Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press, 1989, 290 p.
  32. Hope J., Fraser R. Za gran'yu byudzhetirovaniya. Kak rukovoditelyam vyrvat'sya iz lovushki ezhegodnykh planov [Beyond Budgeting: How Managers Can Break Free from the Annual Performance Trap]. Moscow, Vershina Publ., 2007, 272 p.
  33. Berdnikov V.V., Gavel' O.Yu. [Prospects for strategic analysis of data in implementation of adaptive business management model]. Audit i finansovyi analiz = Audit and Financial Analysis, 2014, no. 6, pp. 239–251. (In Russ)

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8768 (Online)
ISSN 2073-4484 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 14, Iss. 4
December 2021

Archive