+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Financial Analytics: Science and Experience
 

Economic cycles and risks of sovereign debt management

Vol. 9, Iss. 37, OCTOBER 2016

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 19 September 2016

Received in revised form: 26 September 2016

Accepted: 6 October 2016

Available online: 19 October 2016

Subject Heading: RISK, ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION

JEL Classification: E32, H63, N16

Pages: 28-44

Pudova D.O. Financial Research Institute under Ministry of Finance of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
dpudova@nifi.ru

Importance The article overviews economic cycles, which help to detect, identify and evaluate the projected economic situation, decide on the budgetary policy, being interesting for professional market actors. The article also focuses on risks of sovereign debt management in line with economic cycles.
Objectives The research traces risks associated with a choice of borrowing policies in Russia in terms of economic cycles and their study. The research analyzes the practice of monitoring cyclicality factors in the Mexican economy. I also evaluate whether it is possible to use practices and experience of the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (Mexico) to monitor economic cycles in Russia. The research analyzes the risk monitoring process when borrowing policies are articulated in line with economic cycles of the Russian Federation.
Methods To detect the cyclicality, I check the selected indicator against highs and lows of the global indicator of real economic activity. The trend and fluctuations are assessed with the Hodrick –Prescott filter and STATA software.
Results The comprehensive system for evaluation and monitoring of economic cycles in Mexico allows to effectively trace changes in borrowing policies of the State, thus confirming my assertions. When analyzing indicators for monitoring of various sovereign debt management risks, I found indicators having strong and weak cyclical component.
Conclusions and Relevance After sovereign debt management is analyzed, I selected some indicators with definable cyclicality. Such monitoring seems practicable so to take decisions on public budgetary policies. The analysis and conclusions are relevant to trace cycles in order to formulate and implement successful debt management policies at the corporate and governmental levels

Keywords: finance, bond, economic cycle, risk management, sovereign debt

References:

  1. Ziemann V. Debt and Macroeconomic Stability: Debt and the Business Cycle. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 2012, no. 1005. doi:Link
  2. Holler J. Funding Strategies of Sovereign Debt Management: A Risk Focus. Monetary Policy & the Economy, 2013, iss. 2. Available at: Link.
  3. Var'yash I.Yu. [Cyclical conditions of the monetary policy]. Nauchno-issledovatel'skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Research Institute. Finance Journal, 2015, no. 4. (In Russ.)
  4. Becker T. Sovereign Bonds and Public Debt Management. IMF Research Bulletin, 2003, vol. 4, no. 3. Available at: Link.
  5. Barro R.J. Optimal Debt Management. NBER Working Paper, 1995, no. 5327. doi: 10.3386/w5327
  6. Osokina N. [The 1994 Mexican economic crisis]. Obozrevatel'= Observer, 1998, no. 10. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  7. Edwards S. Crisis and Reform in Latin America: From Despair to Hope. World Bank, 1995.
  8. Becketti S. Introduction to Time Series Using Stata. Stata Press, 2013.
  9. Hodrick R.J., Prescott E.C. Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1997, vol. 29, iss. 1, pp. 1–16.
  10. Ravn M.O., Uhlig H. On Adjusting the Hodrick–Prescott Filter for the Frequency of Observations. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2002, vol. 84, iss. 2, pp. 371–376.
  11. Kilian L. Not All Oil Price Shocks Are Alike: Disentangling Demand and Supply Shocks in the Crude Oil Market. American Economic Review, 2009, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 1053–1069. Available at: Link.
  12. Ravazzolo F., Vespignani J.L. A New Monthly Indicator of Global Real Economic Activity. CAMA Working Paper, 2015, no. 13. Available at: Link; Available at: Link.
  13. Pearson N.D. Risk Budgeting: Portfolio Problem Solving with Value-at-Risk. John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
  14. Rockafellar R.T., Uryasev S. Optimization of Conditional Value-at-Risk. Journal of Risk, 2000, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 21–42. Available at: Link.
  15. Papaioannou M. Exchange Rate Risk Measurement and Management: Issues and Approaches for Public Debt Managers. South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, 2015, no. 1, pp. 7–34. Available at: Link.
  16. Ejsing J., Sihvonen J. Liquidity Premia in German Government Bonds. ECB Working Paper, 2009, no. 1081. Available at: Link.
  17. Piga G. Derivatives and Public Debt Management. Zurich, International Securities Market Association, 2001.
  18. Ryzhanovskaya L.Yu., Chistova V.E. [Liquidity issues of the public securities market]. Nauchno-issledovatel'skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Research Institute. Financial Journal, 2011, no. 3, pp. 19–32. (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8768 (Online)
ISSN 2073-4484 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 17, Iss. 1
March 2024

Archive