+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Financial Analytics: Science and Experience
 

Development of budget indicators threshold values, considering the world practices

Vol. 9, Iss. 15, APRIL 2016

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 14 December 2015

Received in revised form: 21 March 2016

Accepted: 4 April 2016

Available online: 27 April 2016

Subject Heading: Economic policy

JEL Classification: E62, F30, H50, H61, O20

Pages: 15-30

Shakhova G.Ya. Financial Research Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation
gshahova@nifi.ru

Manenok P.L. Financial Research Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation
pmanenok@nifi.ru

Importance The paper considers the development of threshold values of budget indicators conducive to achieving the long-term fiscal sustainability and implementation of socio-economic priorities.
Objectives The paper aims to identify the desirability and feasibility of accounting the global practices when developing the budget threshold indicators for Russia and suggest expert estimates of budget threshold indicators for use in the Russian practice of budget planning.
Methods For the study, we used a systems approach that enabled us to get a solution to the problem of achieving the long-term sustainability of the budget system. As well we used methods of economic analysis, expert estimation, and balance methods.
Results We determined the development of budget threshold indicators to achieve the fiscal sustainability over the long term. We analyzed the budget parameters in developed foreign countries and Russia and justified the threshold values of indicators that characterize the role of the State in the redistribution of financial resources in the modern economy.
Conclusions and Relevance We conclude on the legality and appropriateness of the socio-economic performance of developed countries in formulating budget threshold indicators for Russia, as well as the need for the transition of the Russian Federation to the economic model of developed countries, characterized by high proportions of gross domestic product as the overall size of the financial resources reallocated by the budget system and the cost of social protection, health and education. The results can be useful to develop the fiscal policy.

Keywords: long-term fiscal sustainability, government revenues and expenditures, tax burden, threshold values, budget indicators

References:

  1. [Resumption of economic growth is the main target of financial policy]. Finansy = Finance, 2015, no. 5, pp. 8–12. (In Russ.)
  2. Schick A. Sustainable Budget Policy: Concepts and Approaches. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 2005, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 107–126.
  3. Tarschys D. Time Horizons in Budgeting. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 2002, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 77–103.
  4. The Long-Term Sustainability of Public Finances in the European Union. European Economy, 2006, no. 4, pp. 1–226.
  5. Fedosimov B.A. Ugrozy ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti RF iz-za neeffektivnogo raskhodovaniya byudzhetnykh sredstv na razlichnykh urovnyakh byudzhetnoi sistemy RF [Threats to the economic security of the Russian Federation due to the inefficient use of budget funds for the various levels of the budget system of the Russian Federation]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  6. Bauer V.P., Avdiiskii V.I. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' v sisteme transformatsii mirovoi finansovoi arkhitektury [Economic security in the transformation of the global financial architecture]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  7. Denezhkina I.E., Suzdaleva D.A. Sistema pokazatelei dlya monitoringa ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti regiona [A system of indicators for monitoring the economic security of the region]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  8. Senchagov V.K. Obespechenie finansovoi bezopasnosti Rossii v usloviyakh globalizatsii [Ensuring the financial security of Russia in the context of globalization]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  9. Gromova A.S. [Financial stability and security of the budgetary system as key factors of development of the national economy]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika = Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Economy, 2012, no. 1, pp. 154–160. (In Russ.)
  10. Kotenko A.A. Osnovnye sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie pokazateli i ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' Rossii [Major socio-economic indicators and the economic security of Russia]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  11. Var'yash I.Yu., Shvandar K.V., Burova T.F. Aktualizatsiya makroekonomicheskikh prognozov v byudzhetnom protsesse [Update of macroeconomic forecasts in the budget process]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  12. Kotts D. [The liberal model and growth rates in long-term aspect]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya = Problems of Management Theory and Practice, 2004, no. 4, pp. 17–21. (In Russ.)
  13. Petrov Yu.A. [Deofshorization of the economy, countering tax 'minimizing' and capital flight curbing]. Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = Russian Economic Journal, 2013, no. 6, pp. 15–35. (In Russ.)
  14. Petrov Yu.A. [Formation of a new economic model: restriction of budget spending or increase of tax collection?]. Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = Russian Economic Journal, 2013, no. 4, pp. 24–39. (In Russ.)
  15. Zakharov V.K., Golikova E.I. [On the dependence of the country's prosperity and progressive tax scale]. Ekonomist = Economist, 2015, no. 8, pp. 23–40. (In Russ.)
  16. Shakhova G.Ya., Bozhenko I.P. [Public expenditures and the socio-economic development]. Finansy = Finance, 2005, no. 8, pp. 61–66. (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8768 (Online)
ISSN 2073-4484 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 17, Iss. 1
March 2024

Archive