+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Financial Analytics: Science and Experience
 

The process of financial liberalization in small open economies

Vol. 9, Iss. 4, JANUARY 2016

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 24 December 2015

Accepted: 13 October 2015

Available online: 27 January 2016

Subject Heading: MONITORING OF ECONOMIC PROCESSES

JEL Classification: C51, F37, F38, F62

Pages: 2-15

Rakov I.D. Financial Research Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation
rakov@nifi.ru

Importance Capital account liberalization becomes a very topical issue since previous crises proved the vulnerability of economies to global capital flows. It is especially true for small open economies.
     Methods The methodological framework is based on retrospective and econometric analysis of capital account liberalization in South Korea and Iceland.
     Objectives I study the effect of capital account liberalization and external shock on capital flows.
     Results As a result of the analysis, I identified the principal steps of capital account liberalization in Iceland and South Korea and describe them briefly. I scrutinize crisis periods in the above countries, and their policies for lifting (imposing) capital flow limitations. The article presents a system of statistical indicators and econometric analysis of the effect capital account liberalization and external shock have on capital flows in South Korea and Iceland.
     Conclusions and Relevance The capital account liberalization policies and external shock of supply, jointly and separately, have a very considerable effect on capital flows in small open economies and direct investment in Iceland and South Korea, in particular. As the empirical analysis shows, capital account liberalization process has a very ambivalent influence on small open economies.

Keywords: capital account liberalization, flexible exchange rate, capital flow management

References:

  1. Yakovlev I.A., Shvandar K.V. Ispol'zovanie rezhima plavayushchego obmennogo kursa v stranakh s perekhodnoi ekonomikoi [The use of floating exchange rate in emerging economies]. Nauchno-issledovatel'skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Research Institute. Financial Journal, 2015, no. 5, pp. 103–112.
  2. Aghion P., Bacchetta P., Banerjee A. Capital Markets and the Instability of Open Economies. In: The Asian Financial Crisis: Causes, Contagion and Consequences. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000, p. 167.
  3. Urumov T.R. Praktika upravleniya gosudarstvennym dolgom v usloviyakh globalizatsii [The practice of public debt management in terms of globalization]. Nauchno-issledovatel'skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Research Institute. Financial Journal, 2013, no. 4, pp. 129–134.
  4. Mundell R.A. Capital Mobility and Stabilization Policy under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique, 1963, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 475–485.
  5. Roy M., Mishra R., Mishra S. A Review of Cross-Country Experience in Capital Account Liberalization. Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, 2006, vol. 27, no. 1, p. 19.
  6. Park W.A. Financial Liberalization: the Korean Experience. In: Financial Deregulation and Integration in East Asia, NBER-EASE. University of Chicago Press, 1996, vol. 5, pp. 247–276.
  7. Wang Y. Capital Account Liberalization: The Case of Korea. Available at: Link.
  8. Dooley M.P., Shin I. Private Inflows When Crises are Anticipated: a Case Study of Korea. In: Glick R. Financial Crises in Emerging Markets. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 275–279.
  9. Cho Y.J. Financial Crisis in Korea: A Consequence of Unbalanced Liberalization. Seoul, Sogang University Graduate School of International Studies, 1999.
  10. Lim Y.-T. The Liberalization Process of Korean Capital Markets. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 2004, no. 1, pp. 25–40.
  11. Alp H., Elekdag S.A., Lall S. Did Korean Monetary Policy Help Soften the Impact of the Global Financial Crisis of 2008–09? Washington, International Monetary Fund, 2011, 46 p.
  12. Ahn B. Capital Flows and Effects on Financial Markets in Korea: Developments and Policy Responses. BIS Papers, Financial Globalisation and Emerging Market Capital Flows, 2008, no. 44, pp. 305–320.
  13. Liberalizing Capital Flows and Managing Outflows. Washington, International Monetary Fund, 2012, 48 p. Available at: Link.
  14. Baumann B.A., Gallagher K.P. Post-Crisis Capital Account Regulation in South Korea and South Africa. Amherst, Political Economy Research Institute, 2013, 32 p.
  15. Eiger Z.D., Tanenbaum J.R. Regulation of Financial Institutions, Financial Crises and Rescue Packages in Europe: the Iceland Case. In: Global Financial Crisis: Navigating and Understanding the Legal and Regulatory Aspects. London, Globe Business Publishing Ltd, 2009, pp. 109–130.
  16. Portes R., Baldursson F.M., Olafsson F. The Internationalisation of Iceland's Financial Sector. Reykjavik, Iceland Chamber of Commerce, 2007, 70 p.
  17. Gu M. Monetary Policy in Iceland during the Nineties. Monetary Policy in the Nordic Countries: Experiences Since 1992–1997. Basle, Bank for International Settlements, p. 51.
  18. Saborowski C., Sanya S., Weisfeld H., Yepez J. Effectiveness of Capital Outflow Restrictions. IMF Working Paper, 2014, no. 14-18, 33 p.
  19. Chand S.K. The IMF, the Credit Crunch and Iceland: A New Fiscal Saga? Centre for Monetary Economics, 2009. Available at: Link.
  20. Raja H., Jameleddine C. Interaction between Financial Liberalization and Systemic Banking Crises. International Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 69–89.
  21. Kose M.A., Prasad E.S., Rogoff K., Wie S.-J. Financial Globalization and Economic policies. Brookings Global Economy and Development, Working Paper, 2009, no. 34. Available at: Link.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8768 (Online)
ISSN 2073-4484 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 17, Iss. 1
March 2024

Archive