+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Financial Analytics: Science and Experience
 

Financial effectiveness of concession projects under flexible implementation timelines

Vol. 8, Iss. 44, NOVEMBER 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 5 November 2015

Accepted: 11 November 2015

Available online: 27 November 2015

Subject Heading: ECONOMIC AND STATISTICAL RESEARCH

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 32-42

Golyshev G.A. Financial Research Institute of Ministry of Finance of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
g-golyshev@yandex.ru

Importance Concession agreements prove to be one of the main ways of attracting private competences and raising funds to develop public infrastructure.
     Objectives The research examines a new mechanism for regulating the revenue risk, the probable effect of the mechanism on the financial effectiveness of concession projects.
     Methods I analyzed NPV indicators and the probable time of project implementation, and how the indicators are formed. The analysis was based on a real option theory and econometric modeling using the Monte-Carlo method.
     Results The study revealed that the growth in revenue discounting rate reduces the volatility of NPV and extends the potential duration of a concession project. The inverse relationship is revealed between potential duration of the operational stage and expected NPV of the project.
     Conclusions and Relevance The mechanism for securing gross (accumulated) revenue has a comparable effect on NPV as other mechanisms of the revenue risk regulation, with the concessor reducing its financial interest in projects. In such circumstances, the mechanism for securing gross revenue can become relevant to the Russian practice individually or jointly with other mechanisms. The findings can be used by financial and economic structures of the executive authorities to initiate concession projects, by managing companies and institutional investors.

Keywords: concession agreement, revenue risk mitigation, revenue, real options theory, Monte-Carlo method

References:

  1. Vassallo J. The Role of the Discount Rate in Tendering Highway Concessions under the LPVR Approach. Transportation Research, 2010, vol. 44, iss. 10, pp. 806–814.
  2. Garvin M., Chiara N., Vecer J. Valuing Simple Multiple-exercise Real Options in Infrastructure Projects. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2007, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 97–104.
  3. Nombela G., de Rus G. Flexible-term Contracts for Road Franchising. Transportation Research, 2004, vol. 38, iss. 3, pp. 163–179.
  4. Golyshev G.A. Razvitie infrastruktury s ispol'zovaniem kontsessionnykh i dolgosrochnykh investitsionnykh kontraktov [Infrastructure development through concession and long-term investment agreements]. Nauchno-issledovatel'skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Research Institute. Financial Journal, 2014, no. 1, pp. 101–110.
  5. Praktika primeneniya kontsessionnykh soglashenii dlya razvitiya regional'noi infrastruktury v Rossii [The practice of using concession agreements for the regional infrastructure development in Russia]. Moscow, Tsentr razvitiya gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva Publ., 2014, 56 p.
  6. Albalate D., Bel G. Regulating Concessions of Toll Motorways: An Empirical Study on Fixed vs. Variable Term Contracts. Transportation Research, 2009, vol. 43, iss. 2, pp. 219–229.
  7. Bain R. Error and Optimism Bias in Toll Road Traffic Forecasts. Transportation, 2009, vol. 36, iss. 5, pp. 469–482.
  8. Bel G., Foote J. Tolls, Terms and Public Interest in Road Concessions Privatization: A Comparative Analysis of Recent Transactions in the USA and France. Transport Reviews, 2009, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 397–413.
  9. Chiara N., Kokkaew N.A. Modeling Government Revenue Guarantees in Privately Built Transportation Projects: A Risk-Adjusted Approach. Transport, 2013, vol. 28, iss. 2, pp. 186–192.
  10. Сraciun M. A New Type of Risk in Infrastructure Projects. Modern Economy, 2011, no. 2, pp 479–482.
  11. Garvin M., Chiara N. Utilizing Real Options for Revenue Risk Mitigation in Transportation Project Financing. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007, no. 1993, pp. 1–8.
  12. Garvin M., Chiara N. Variance Models for Project Financial Risk Analysis with Applications to Greenfield BOT Highway Projects. Construction Management and Economics, 2008, vol. 26, iss. 9, pp. 925–939.
  13. Garvin M., Ford D. Real Options in Infrastructure Projects: Theory, Practice and Prospects. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 2012, vol. 2, iss. 1-2, pp. 97–108.
  14. Neufville R. et al. Real Options to Increase the Value of Intelligent Transportation Systems. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2008, no. 2086, pp. 40–47.
  15. Reinhardt W. The Role of Private Investment in Meeting U.S. Transportation Infrastructure Needs. Public Works Financing, 2011, no. 260.
  16. Vassallo J. Traffic Risk Mitigation in Highway Concession Projects: the Experience of Chile. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 2006, vol. 40, pp. 359–381.
  17. Vassallo J., Soliño A. The Minimum Income Guarantee in Transportation Infrastructure Concessions in Chile. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006, no. 1960, pp. 15–23.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8768 (Online)
ISSN 2073-4484 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 17, Iss. 1
March 2024

Archive