+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Financial Analytics: Science and Experience
 

Definition of the contour of automation of budgeting system

Vol. 8, Iss. 10, MARCH 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Available online: 12 March 2015

Subject Heading: Economic policy

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 60-66

Remizova T.S. Research Financial Institute of Ministry of Finance of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
tttatia@yandex.ru

Platonova N.A. Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
pnatalya@mail.ru

Importance The current market trends indicate keen interest of the Russian companies on the automation of budgeting processes and management accounting. However, companies face the choice of the type of automation system: in the outline of the existing systems, or by a separate system.
     Objectives The research aimed at identifying the main criteria, which are applicable to define outline of the budgeting system implantation with the smallest time and labor expenditures and the determination of their (criteria of) significance.
     Methods By means of an expert method, the research identifies and analyzes criteria, which impact on the choice of an automation path of budgeting system. We performed the criteria analysis based on the results of implemented projects on automation of budgeting processes and management accounting in four companies of different sectors and types of economic activities.
     Results The findings identify the criteria and their importance in the total volume of indicators, which are applicable for the analysis of choice of automation outline of the budgetary system.
     Conclusions and Relevance We conclude that the main indicators we can rely on are as follows: the number of responsibility centers involved in the budget model; the number of operational, functional and master budgets; the existence of other automated units; the number of persons involved in harmonization process; complexity of calculations; cost of automation; the need for providing consolidated information; existence of complex corporate or branch structure; carrying out of primary/secondary automation. These criteria should help both the companies themselves and integrating companies when introducing budgeting systems, and to determine an optimal path of system automation.

Keywords: automation outline, responsibility center, company, budgeting, management accounting

References:

  1. Grigor'ev A.V. Kompleksnyi podkhod k sozdaniyu sistemy byudzhetirovaniya na predpriyatii [An integrated approach to budgeting system creation at an enterprise]. Rossiiskoe predprinimatel'stvo = Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2009, no. 12, iss. 2, pp. 86–75.
  2. Domozhirova O.V., Tkachenko G.A. Primenenie ekonomiko-matematicheskikh modelei v byudzhetirovanii [Application of economic and mathematical models in budgeting]. Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya = Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, 2013, no. 8, pp. 169–176.
  3. Zhukova V.V. Oshibki v byudzhetirovanii na rossiiskikh predpriyatiyakh i sposoby ikh ustraneniya [Budgeting errors at Russian enterprises and their remedies]. Ekonomicheskie nauki = Economic Sciences, 2011, no. 83, pp. 172–176.
  4. Ivanova Zh.A. Byudzhetirovanie kak instrument upravleniya deyatel'nost'yu predpriyatii [Budgeting as a tool to manage the activities of enterprises]. Problemy ekonomiki = Problems of Economy, 2008, no. 3, pp. 56–59.
  5. Isaev D.V. Byudzhetirovanie s primeneniem informatsionnykh sistem [Budgeting with the use of information systems]. Upravlencheskii uchet = Management Accounting, 2008, no. 7, pp. 99–106.
  6. Korshunov D.V. K voprosu o byudzhetirovanii kak effektivnoi tekhnologii upravleniya [The issue of budgeting as an effective technology of management]. Mikroekonomika = Microeconomics, 2011, no. 1, pp. 45–51.
  7. Kurganskaya E.V. Sovremennye podkhody k byudzhetirovaniyu [Modern approaches to budgeting]. Aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk = Topical Issues of Humanities and Natural Sciences, 2011, no. 5, pp. 45–48.
  8. Panov M.M. Postanovka sistemy byudzhetnogo upravleniya ili tri koordinaty biznesa: BDR, BDDS, BBL [Staging a system of budget management or the three coordinates of business: MDR, BDDS, BBL]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2014, 304 p.
  9. Petrova E.V. Sovremennye podkhody k byudzhetirovaniyu [Modern approaches to budgeting]. Ekonomika i upravlenie: novye vyzovy i perspektivy = Economics and Management: New Challenges and Perspectives, 2012, no. 3, pp. 274–276.
  10. Pushkarev E. Tipy byudzhetnykh modelei i ikh primenimost' v sovremennykh usloviyakh [Types of budget models and their applicability in modern conditions]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  11. Seregina S.F., Moiseeva M.A., Zhuravleva N.A. Obzor finansovogo sostoyaniya predpriyatiya real'nogo sektora ekonomiki v period krizisa [An overview of the financial situation of enterprises of the real sector of the economy in times of crisis]. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal, 2009, no. 1, pp. 5–24.
  12. Slovar' biznes-terminov. Model' byudzhetnaya [Dictionary of business terms. A budget model]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  13. Tyrin E.A. Byudzhetirovanie kak instrument operativnogo upravleniya deyatel'nost'yu predpriyatii [Budgeting as a tool for the operational management of enterprises]. Avtomobil'naya promyshlennost' = Automotive Industry, 2008, no. 6, pp. 1–3.
  14. Khrutskii V.E., Khrutskii R.V. Sistemy byudzhetirovaniya. Sem' shagov po effektivnoi postanovke byudzhetirovaniya [Budgeting systems. Seven steps to effective performance budgeting]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 2007, 176 p.
  15. Shakhova G.Ya. Sovremennye tendentsii v metodologii byudzhetnogo prognozirovaniya [Modern trends in budgetary forecasting methodology]. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal, 2013, no. 4, pp. 61–70.
  16. Shakhova G.Ya. Metodologicheskie osobennosti dolgosrochnogo byudzhetnogo planirovaniya: mirovoi opyt [Methodological features of long-term budget planning: the world experience]. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal, 2009, no. 2, pp. 99–108.
  17. Shakhovskaya L.S., Khokhlov V.V., Kulakova O.G. Byudzhetirovanie: teoriya i praktika [Budgeting: theory and practice]. Moscow, KnoRus Publ., 2009, 400 p.
  18. Kharitonova G.G. Protsessnyi podkhod v upravlencheskom uchete i byudzhetirovanii [A process approach in management accounting and budgeting]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2012, no. 3, pp. 39–42.
  19. Sharipov I.N. Vnedrenie byudzhetirovaniya, orientirovannogo na rezul'tat, v sfere sel'skogo khozyaistva Leningradskoi oblasti [The introduction of result-based budgeting in the sphere of the Leningrad region agriculture]. Ekonomika sel'skogo khozyaistva. Referativnyi zhurnal = Agricultural Economics. Abstract Journal, 2010, no. 1.
  20. Yudin M.V. Postroenie sistemy upravleniya predpriyatiem v usloviyakh realizatsii rynochnoi strategii [Building an enterprise management system in the context of market strategy]. Moscow, Dashkov i K Publ., 2006.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8768 (Online)
ISSN 2073-4484 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 17, Iss. 1
March 2024

Archive